I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
'God' is optional in the NZ one but yes, it's archaic bullshit regardless. It's only for immigrants who want to be citizens, and certainly not for children. The 'pledge of allegiance' clearly has affected SF because his Nationalism blares out like an air-raid siren and he's not even aware of it.
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27608
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
I presume you live in one of our several countries that already has freedom of belief. In that case, you're already as "free from religions" as anyone can be.Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:01 pm I prefer freedom from religions more than freedom of religions.
Maybe you want something else. Maybe you want your religion (Gnostic) to be forced or compelled upon people, and them to be deprived of any alternate belief. Because short of that, you've already got the best situation anybody could wish.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
Think again. Kristianity's insidious tentacles are still involved in many aspects of the laws of countries that are supposed to be secular. These days they like to disguise their superstitious and dictatorial bullshit with pseudoscience, false claims, pseudopsychology and crocodile tears. In a nutshell: LIES.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:59 pmI presume you live in one of our several countries that already has freedom of belief. In that case, you're already as "free from religions" as anyone can be.Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:01 pm I prefer freedom from religions more than freedom of religions.
Maybe you want something else. Maybe you want your religion (Gnostic) to be forced or compelled upon people, and them to be deprived of any alternate belief. Because short of that, you've already got the best situation anybody could wish.
- Greatest I am
- Posts: 3116
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
That is Islam's symbol just as the cross is for Christians.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:17 pmThen why the star and crescent?Greatest I am wrote: Not that I know of.
Regards
DL
- Greatest I am
- Posts: 3116
- Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
I cannot compel belief. Can you?Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:59 pmYes. I live in Canada, but I do not have freedom from religion when my tax dollars support religions by my having to help make up the tax shortfall that their tax exemptions give them.I presume you live in one of our several countries that already has freedom of belief. In that case, you're already as "free from religions" as anyone can be.Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:01 pm I prefer freedom from religions more than freedom of religions.
Maybe you want something else. Maybe you want your religion (Gnostic) to be forced or compelled upon people, and them to be deprived of any alternate belief. Because short of that, you've already got the best situation anybody could wish.
That was a rhetorical question. Please ignore it.
That aside, yes, I see Gnostic Christianity as the best possible thinking pattern as it allows and even insists on free thinking that does not really permit idol worshiping.
Regards
DL
- Immanuel Can
- Posts: 27608
- Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 4:42 pm
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
Yeah, so? Not the question.Greatest I am wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 10:26 pm That aside, yes, I see Gnostic Christianity as the best possible thinking pattern...
I'm asking, do you want to eradicate all other views? And if you don't, just what is it you do want, that you don't already have?
- Arising_uk
- Posts: 12259
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 2:31 am
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
But a flag is for a country normally?Greatest I am wrote:That is Islam's symbol just as the cross is for Christians.
Which flag is it they have to swear allegiance on when becoming an American citizen?
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
It didn't? I'd say internment has been extremely successful historically. Far more humane than transportation or ethnic cleansing.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:05 pmWe tried it with the Irish Christian terrorists - it didn't work.
Just doing a little reading, British interned 1500 Irish. Meanwhile it is suggested 3000 are involved in active Islamic plots in the UK plus another 23,000 connected. Getting these 25,000 people out of the milieu will definitely make a huge difference to the safety of Britons. Secondarily but in the long run more important will be reducing the spread of Islamism in the culture and make a huge deterrent statement.
Out side the UK, drones have killed only about 3000 Islamists in 10 years, this program should be significantly expanded.
No. They need to be met at the military level. There are important reasons for this as far as the concept of a state goes: insiders are punished and trained or at least treated to a duty of care, but outsiders are combatants and killed without questions in war, without trial and other processes afforded to nationals.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:05 pmYou really need to stop treating these people as what they claim and just treat them as criminals.
Last edited by Seleucus on Mon Jun 05, 2017 4:25 am, edited 3 times in total.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
An average of once per three years. Islam is doing this everyday. Poor comparison.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 8:58 pmHow about these?
http://www.alternet.org/tea-party-and-r ... -white-men
No don't tell me - they weren't Christians.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
One important difference is the number of attacks happening in 2017. Right wingers=1 per 3 years. Islam=1 per 5 hours. Another important difference if you are a White conservative Westerner is Islam is attacking you, while Right wingers are ostensibly acting for you.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:09 pmGreatest I am wrote: I do not see much difference between a right wing Christian and right wing Muslim. Both camps have really immoral tenants.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
In my view it is a corruption of the sun and moon icon of ancient Sumer. The Vergina Sun, or Macedonian Sun, in my opinion, has the same point of origin. Like obelisks, these ancient symbols of power were co-opted by others after them who sometimes misunderstood their original meaning and use.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
When I think about the French or Russian revolution and what it took to stop Christianity, it's scary to think about what will be required to stop Islam. And if that effort isn't raised against Islam, nothing will stop it. We are seeing since 1000 AD that Islam is impervious to rationality: the renaissance of the Internet isn't going to stop Islam, it will more likely create a cyber-Islamism, a lock-down on society and psychology more total than anything imagined in any sci-fi.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
Seleucus, do you see any future in Islam when you think of Amaddiyah Islam? I understand that Saudi Muslims are a variety of Sunni Islam.
Islam is not all one solid colour but the world of Muslims contains fundamentalist and liberal sects.
Islam is not all one solid colour but the world of Muslims contains fundamentalist and liberal sects.
- vegetariantaxidermy
- Posts: 13975
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 6:45 am
- Location: Narniabiznus
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
Are you counting the number of attacks by 'western' countries on muslim ones?Seleucus wrote: ↑Mon Jun 05, 2017 3:26 amOne important difference is the number of attacks happening in 2017. Right wingers=1 per 3 years. Islam=1 per 5 hours. Another important difference if you are a White conservative Westerner is Islam is attacking you, while Right wingers are ostensibly acting for you.Arising_uk wrote: ↑Sun Jun 04, 2017 9:09 pmGreatest I am wrote: I do not see much difference between a right wing Christian and right wing Muslim. Both camps have really immoral tenants.
Re: I am an Islamophobe. If you are not, you might not be a moral person.
Seleucus wrote:
Or you might opine that the age of revolutions is past and what we need now is the slow and courageous evolution of ideas. This is why it's important, when combating terrorists and terrorism, to stay faithful to democracy and precious freedoms.When I think about the French or Russian revolution and what it took to stop Christianity, it's scary to think about what will be required to stop Islam. And if that effort isn't raised against Islam, nothing will stop it. We are seeing since 1000 AD that Islam is impervious to rationality: the renaissance of the Internet isn't going to stop Islam, it will more likely create a cyber-Islamism, a lock-down on society and psychology more total than anything imagined in any sci-fi.