SpheresOfBalance wrote:In this case, I don't need to know anything about your personal life, all I need to know is that we share the same biology, unless of course you're a frog? But then only humans use computers, right? We are the same in that we are both ruled by testosterone, unless what rules you is estrogen. The difference between us is knowledge, did you even consider biology before taking offense. I can see that you are yet another one that fails to understand the truth of things. Which is the physics of the universe! And you bite off the head of anyone that knows more about you, than apparently, you do. And you said I jump to conclusions, just put me on ignore like all the rest, that fear truth. No not mine, but that of the human condition, of which we all share, if we only pay attention and are honest with ourselves. Count me as a no account, as it shall serve your frustration well.
i was talking about your posts in general, not just this one.
alpha wrote:don't take this the wrong way, but you are the king of ad homs.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:No I'm the king of observation, and I've observed people for 58 years, as I traveled around the world, seeing difference, and yet none. I actually had a personality profile done by PhD's in psychology amongst other humanities, which said that I have the uncanny ability to 'alienate' people (sound familiar?) because I tend to cut them off before they finish speaking, as I often know what it is their going to say, before they say it, the test referred to me as the 'consummate observer.' Now you can believe what you want to, there is no doubt in my mind that you shall. But I was 'extremely' introverted as a young man, I hardly spoke to any one, instead I watched them very closely, and in so doing, while not considering self, I picked up on everything that they were, in terms of human motivations. It's a curse in terms of friendship, yet it's a blessing in terms of knowing the human animal. No it wasn't fun at all, all that I missed observing, instead of living life, but it's valuable.
i'm also very observant, but mostly when it comes to logical fallacies and inconsistencies.
alpha wrote:you're almost incapable of replying without making reference (in some way) to the other person's personal life, based on what you perceive them to be, nonetheless.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:No in this particular case it was to do with biology, chemically in your brain, not your personal life. Boys will be boys is a very old saying indeed! That you are unaware of it is unsurprising, time has that affect.
as i mentioned, i was referring to your overall demeanor.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:So put me on ignore, I'm not your standard everyday Joe. Want me to show you how to do it, or shall your pride see you through it?
only if you can explain it in under ten pages.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Sorry but I get feisty sometimes, especially in the face of a gang bang. Of course you'd think I'd be used to it by now.
and you blame me for assuming you're a woman, after a few interactions.
SpheresOfBalance wrote:Later my
once friend![/color]

twice friend. let's give it another shot, shall we?