Er sorry, I meant to say day job. Not day of, obviously.
Also, surreptitious57, wtf was asking what my normative theory supports, not what is legal.
A new normative theory and the demandingness objection
-
Daniel McKay
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:48 am
- Hobbes' Choice
- Posts: 8360
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:45 am
Re: A new normative theory and the demandingness objection
If you day job is philosopher and Hex told you not to quit it, does not fly against the idea that he does not like philosophy. In fact, it being true that he does not - and he does not explicitly and openly, that ought to give you pause about what he actually meant.Daniel McKay wrote:Well he told me not to quit my day of as a philosopher, so he can't be completely against it.
Does he even suspect that your day job is, in fact, philosophy?
-
Daniel McKay
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 2:48 am
Re: A new normative theory and the demandingness objection
I got what you meant. I was being facetious.