The Shah was a monster, and a puppet of the Western Powers. His misrule led to the Revolution. Maybe if Mohammad Mosaddegh had stayed in power his full term and Iran had kept control of its oil interests, democracy may have thrived and grown. But the Anglo/America oil interests wishing to keep Russia out of Persia led to the coup. You would have been born into a different country - one that has not suffered from sanctions. When pressed from the outside, oppression works on the inside too.
The deal is seen as something very positive here, and the rise of IS (ISIS, ISIL) in Iraq is taken as an opportunity to talk with Iran as you are against the IS. So from a bad thing some good can be found.
It is only Israel that is still making negative propaganda against Iran, and claiming that you will use nuclear weapons to support IS which is stupid. And American Conservatives who still would prefer to attack Iran because of the hostage situation back in the 1980s.
That's nice to hear that you have political info about Iran , but The Shah was not as monster as the new ones . I think America saw Iran's power as a threat (Iran was the 5th military power) like Russia . America didn't want a 3rd opponent and helped the Islamic revolution to happen as Mr. Reagan said in one of his interviews (That's one of the ways America keeps the power and controls the world .)
And thanks for the latest news on BBC .
I just don't want Iran to be like N Korea .
. my country has enough great poets too that I haven't read their poems yet ... 
