' . . big picture view of the universe, built of space-time

[socratus]

' . . big picture view of the universe, built of space-time, '
Have Three Little Photons Broken Theoretical Physics?

http://www.space.com/17399-gamma-ray-ph ... etime.html
==.

My comment.

' A world without masses, without electrons, without an
electromagnetic field is an empty world. Such an empty
world is flat. But if masses appear, if charged particles
appear, if an electromagnetic field appears then our world
becomes curved. Its geometry is Riemannian, that is,
non- Euclidian. '

/ Book ' Albert Einstein ' The page 116 . by Leopold Infeld. /
===.

1.
Universe as a whole without masses, without electrons,
without an electromagnetic field is an empty world.
Such an empty world is flat ( infinite flat ).
2.
But if masses appear, if charged particles appear,
if an electromagnetic field appears ( in local places )
then our world becomes curved ( in local places stars
and planets were created ).
From outside point of view it is local Riemannian geometry,
non- Euclidian geometry .
==..

[socratus]

Have Three Little Photons Broken Theoretical Physics?
http://www.space.com/17399-gamma-ray-ph ... etime.html
==.

Even one single photon can broken the opinion of modern theoretical physics.
=.
‘ All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me
no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it,
but he is mistaken. ‘
/ Einstein /
In light of ' the quantum of light ', we will always know the truth.
Socratus

[Arising_uk]

See! Fredkin and the DP mob are correct, its all a SIM(of is that an emulation?) I tell you!!

The GEO600 experiment is picking-up noise that might lead to a cosmic microwave background moment in Physics.

[Cerveny]

There is one substantial thing that GTR misses: It is a gravitational repulsion. It should be derived from antimatter properties or/and from matter motion :( We should consider the inertial motion as an analogy to electromagnetic wave. We should consider to extend Dirac formalism to protons/antiprotons…

[socratus]

We are setting limits on things ( for example: c=1, T=0K )
that we don’t have a clue about.
From these two parameters (c=1, T=0K ) was started
all modern speculations in Physics ( SRT, QT, GRT ).

==..