M Logic; Mobius Logic

What is the basis for reason? And mathematics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Eodnhoj7
Posts: 10725
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2017 3:18 am

M Logic; Mobius Logic

Post by Eodnhoj7 »

++++M Logic; Mobius Logic





1. All distinctions are a dualism of presence and absence, the presence of one as the absence of another, the absence of one as the presence of another.



2. All distinctions are simultaneous presence and absence, as dually both they are a mobius strip.



3. The presence of X contains the absence of X as X.1 as the part,



****A line segment as X.1 and X.2 where X.1 is not X but a part thus X is not present as the part.



the presence of X is part of the absence of X as X.1.1



****A line segment as X where X.1.1 is not X but as X is a part.



4. The absence of X contains the presence of X as X.1, 



****X.1 as a segment of X is the presence of X at a different scale but this different scale is not X defined by a seperate scale.



the absence of X as part the presence of X as X.1.1



****The scale where X is a part of X.1.1 is X as X.1.1 at a different scale.



****Containment is both mereological and representational as these distinctions of mereological and representing are effective the operation of M.



5. All distinctions are M; M is the variable of Mobius strip, simultaneous opposites.



6. M follows the logic of points 3 and for as M results through -M by the contrast for M to be distinct as M as M can only be distinct by what it is not; the absence of contrast is the absence of distinction



7. M and -M are contained within and part of another M; M is self-embedding as a fixed point that occurs across scale thus resulting in a recursive fixed point operation.



8. Standard epistemological terms would result in M being a paradox, a contradiction, both a paradox and contradiction as a higher order paradox, and neither paradox or contradiction as a higher order contradiction;



A. M as paradox is the unity of opposites by contained relation



B. M as contradiction is the multiplicity of opposites by contrasting opposition.



C. Both paradox and contradiction are a higher order paradox by degree of point A.



D. Neither paradox nor contradiction are a higher order contradiction by degree of point B.



9. Point 8 contains points A and B as M, points C and D as M, thus point 8 is M as opposite Ms.



10. M is the act of distinction, wherever distinction emerges or dissolves M logic is the foundational operation; by degree it is recursive as the repetition of any distinction allows for a contained presence while the inverse contrast allows said distinct by the very same recursion.



This can be observed with a single point: ●

The recursion of the point as: ●● results in:



A.  The containment of ●  by ●●.

B.  The self contrast of ● by ●●.

C.  ●● is the recursive structure.

D.  ● is the recursive process.

E.  M is distinction as structural process.

F.  Standard symbolic languages which results in a process/pattern, form/function, operator/operand dichotomy as effectively contained as M.  A symbolic language that removes this dichotomy would be left with a higher dichotomy of M that as a structural process is recursive function finite as emergent form: M, MM, (MM)M



11. The refutation of M logic require M logic thus proving M logic; any logic outside of M logic is but a sub-logic thus resulting in M being transcendental containment.



12. Formalism:



M is a transcendental operator variable. A transcendental operator variable can be defined as such.  It is distinction in simple terms.  In synonymous terms:



Transcendental is change as limit emergence and dissolution,



Operator is the structure of the change,



Variable is the foundational nature than can vary in appearance in accords to context.



Transcendental operator variable can be defined as the emergence and dissolution of structural change, embedded within itself, that changes appearance in accords to self-scaling.



The syntax and function of the formalism is recursion as distinction.



M



MM

M(+,-)

M(+)M(+) (x)

M(x)M(x) (^)

M(-)M(-) (÷)

M(÷)M(÷) (rts)





M(++) (-)

M(+++) (+)

.....



M(--) (+)

M(---) (-)

....



MM

M (->,<->)

M -> M (M<->M)

M <-> M (M -> M)



MM

M(+,-) M(->,<->)

M(+,-)(->,<->)

M(x●,y●)

***x●, y●: opposite distinction sets



MM

M(x●,y●)

M(x●x●) (y●)

M(y●y●) (x●)

**** In this context

x● = quantity as a distinction

y● = quality as a distinction



MM

M (●,●●)

**** ● = distinct fixed point/geometric point

**** ●● = distinct scale/geometric point scale



M(● ●) (●●)

M(●● ●●) (●)





M

MM

(M)M

((M)M) (M, MM)



(MM)M

(M)MM

M(M)M

(M)M(M)

(MMM)

M
Post Reply