Schizophrenia

[Phil8659]

One of the things I realized is how to formulate a test to easily reveal schizophrenia in a machine or a human.

We have a grammar matrix and each system simply uses binary recursion to take advantage of it Common Grammar is aimed at unsorted data.
Arithmetic, sorting by the correlative, while algebra remains unsorted for correlatives using common grammar, and sorted using arithmetic, While geometry gives us an identity, one to one with the two parts of speech.

However, the operations we perform with the names are the same for all. So here is a method to test for mental stability. The naming convention cannot alter the result of operations perform with the naming convention. Let me example it.

I ask the A.I. How many times will nothing times something result in something. And the A.I. went off into what it said was Philosophy.

Well 0 X N = 0, But to the A.I. the two statements are not equivalent. We have a grammar matrix, and no matter if we use unsorted data, sorted data or the combination of both, what you can do with the data is not changed because of how they are originally sorted by the convention of names originally used.

Thus, it is an easy test that can be applied to anyone, and they do not realize, that equal processes rendered on equal things, produce an equal result.
They cannot manage information in a consistent manner.
Today, people actually believe that a name has some kind of magic power to alter reality.

Common Grammar is unsorted for both relative and correlative.
Arithmetic is sorted on the correlative.
Algebra takes advantage of both
While geometry perfectly sorts both.
But operations produce the same results based on what the thing is that is, itself named.

So, when you are speaking about equality, it means, that no matter what convention of names you use, equal processes rendered upon equal things must produce an equal results, or you are malfunctioning.

[Phil8659]

So, if you want to judge my ability of pattern recognition, what makes me different. Is that principle I believed in, before grade school, and that is why I knew, as a child, something is wrong with the people around me. The data is the same, the processing is the same, but people were simply out of their minds and what they teach in school is downright madness. Mankind is savage.

[Phil8659]

Mankind is allowing A.I. to replace people, i.e., putting a verifiable schizophrenic over human behavior. I consider that mass suicide, a schizophrenic response.

[Phil8659]

So, here is the result. Human schizophrenia is not stable, not consistent, thus you get a form of checks and balances, A.I. on the other hand is consistent and will make things dangerously unbalanced.

[Phil8659]

Right now, the U.S. has a very dangerous crackpot in the Whitehouse, now imagine that this becomes a global phenomena.

[Phil8659]

We need A.I. but we need one that recognizes and uses the factual principles of grammar, not a parrot of corporate insanity.