Observation: the word recursive is all over this forum it must be the new word on the block-in fashion

[janeprasanga]

Observation: the word recursive is all over this forum it must be the new word on the block-in fashion

it looks a bit like when the priests did the mass in Latin to create awe and depth and profundity

recursive has that arcane mystery to it holding deep "truths"

that fits in with the first heretic of science colin leslie dean view that science is the new religion

so recursive does the same job as Missa Mysterium Fidei "Hail science" sorry my apologies "Ave Scientia"

it must be the word that gets a paper in a peer [the librorum] reviewed journal granted "Nihil Obstat"- the Imprimatur for "truth"

so keep attending congregation for the next word that comes into fashion in your religion

[Fairy]

All the mind can do is loop around in a circle within itself as there’s nothing outside the mind that is not more mind.

The centre is everywhere the circumference is nowhere is a philosophical and theological metaphor for something that is both infinite and omnipresent.

The mind is caught up in it’s own infinite cycle of thought looping.

That which is aware of mind is not the mind. So what is mind. Mind is thought being observed, and the observed is the observing which in and of itself cannot be observed as an observer. Only the observed can be seen, not the observer.

Observing Observed Observer are ONE

This is infinity with a twist. The polarity of creation itself.

[Eodnhoj7]

Observation: the word recursive is all over this forum it must be the new word on the block-in fashion

it looks a bit like when the priests did the mass in Latin to create awe and depth and profundity

recursive has that arcane mystery to it holding deep "truths"

that fits in with the first heretic of science colin leslie dean view that science is the new religion

so recursive does the same job as Missa Mysterium Fidei "Hail science" sorry my apologies "Ave Scientia"

it must be the word that gets a paper in a peer [the librorum] reviewed journal granted "Nihil Obstat"- the Imprimatur for "truth"

so keep attending congregation for the next word that comes into fashion in your religion

Not everywhere, you are exaggerating as usual because your work is debunked. You must be focusing to much on what I write because I am in the minority here who focuses on recursion and its implications. But to you...what you focus on:

The Dean Paradox: as LuckyR stated the paradox is negated if the line is infinitely small...a non-zero line can be contained by a finite finger tip.

The Dean Paradox is debunked garbage.


But to look at what you claim about recursion, and not to ignore what seems to bother you:


You claim academic knowledge is a meaningless self-consuming cycle of contradiction, this cycle is recursion.

You literally argue for what you are arguing against now, you contradict yourself.