Who wants to SEE where PHILOSOPHY is in UK

[attofishpi]

This is paranoid nonsense. Muslims are just as varied in their views as Christians, or indeed atheists.

Locking thread because I don't like its overtones.

Oh.. OK Rick as a philosopher, please explain these "overtones" that are NOT permissible within intelligent philosophical dialogue

Within the thread :- viewtopic.php?t=43347



What is the problem...is it a friendship or more within dooooopidnessss people of London

[attofishpi]

This is paranoid nonsense.

Ergo, have the gumption to debate (*as a philosopher)

..indeed, where hast moi been merely "paranoid" with "nonsense"

[accelafine]

You just can't help yourself. One locked thread is nothing to cry about.

[godelian]

This is paranoid nonsense. Muslims are just as varied in their views as Christians, or indeed atheists.

Locking thread because I don't like its overtones.

Oh.. OK Rick as a philosopher, please explain these "overtones" that are NOT permissible within intelligent philosophical dialogue

Within the thread :- viewtopic.php?t=43347



What is the problem...is it a friendship or more within dooooopidnessss people of London

It is exactly because a certain kind of people were hostile to Islam that I became interested in what it actually was.

After my initial investigation, I ended up concluding that Islam is pure genius. That is one major reason why I "converted".

What happened, is a variation on the Streisand effect:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information.

You see, you are not defending anything. You are not promoting what you believe in. You are just shit talking other people and their beliefs. So, I already know from the type of arguments that you use, and the uninteresting goal that you pursue, that you can only be wrong.

It is exactly because people like you insist on railing against the Muslims that I like them even more. If people like you hadn't done that in the past, I would probably never have "converted". So, I am grateful to all the shit talkers for pointing me in the right direction.

To some extent, the same holds true about Jews. The main difference with the Muslims is that the Jews don't want me to join their club. So, I obviously won't. Besides that, it is clear to me that Jewish law is genius too, for the same reasons as Islamic law. If there weren't people railing against the Jews, I wouldn't even be aware of the fact that Jewish law is another brilliant take on the same subject.

If you don't have anything to offer besides railing against other people, then what is your "invitation" all about? What "improvement" do you propose besides talking shit about what other people believe? Where is the constructive element in your views?

[accelafine]

This is paranoid nonsense. Muslims are just as varied in their views as Christians, or indeed atheists.

Locking thread because I don't like its overtones.

Oh.. OK Rick as a philosopher, please explain these "overtones" that are NOT permissible within intelligent philosophical dialogue

Within the thread :- viewtopic.php?t=43347



What is the problem...is it a friendship or more within dooooopidnessss people of London

It is exactly because a certain kind of people were hostile to Islam that I became interested in what it actually was.

After my initial investigation, I ended up concluding that Islam is pure genius. That is one major reason why I "converted".

What happened, is a variation on the Streisand effect:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

The Streisand effect is an unintended consequence of attempts to hide, remove, or censor information, where the effort instead increases public awareness of the information.

You see, you are not defending anything. You are not promoting what you believe in. You are just shit talking other people and their beliefs. So, I already know from the type of arguments that you use, and the uninteresting goal that you pursue, that you can only be wrong.

It is exactly because people like you insist on railing against the Muslims that I like them even more. If people like you hadn't done that in the past, I would probably never have "converted". So, I am grateful to all the shit talkers for pointing me in the right direction.

To some extent, the same holds true about Jews. The main difference with the Muslims is that the Jews don't want me to join their club. So, I obviously won't. Besides that, it is clear to me that Jewish law is genius too, for the same reasons as Islamic law. If there weren't people railing against the Jews, I wouldn't even be aware of the fact that Jewish law is another brilliant take on the same subject.

If you don't have anything to offer besides railing against other people, then what is your "invitation" all about? What "improvement" do you propose besides talking shit about what other people believe? Where is the constructive element in your views?

Care to copy-paste which part is 'genius'? The part where micropenises are idolised? Makes sense.

[godelian]

Care to copy-paste which part is 'genius'? The part where micropenises are idolised? Makes sense.

The use of shaming language generally does not work on me.

I will only feel guilty or remorse if a religious scholar successfully points out that I have willfully committed a serious offense against Islamic law.

If an unbeliever tries to shame me, I will spit, pee, and shit on that person. It just confirms in my eyes that the unbelievers are ultimately the scum of the earth. I despise the fake morality of the unbelievers. I view that kind of people with contempt only.

So, as an unbeliever, you cannot shame me, because there are two billion other people spitting, peeing, and shitting on you. We all think the same thing. It is powerful shared understanding amongst us that your opinion is worthless to us. You are up against a gigantic wall of contempt.

We think that you suck and we don't give a flying fart what you think about that, because your opinion is absolutely irrelevant. You perfectly well know that we don't need you for anything. I am speaking for two billion people here.

[accelafine]

What is that phony blithering about?

[godelian]

What is that phony blithering about?

I was just expressing contempt, in a rather dispassionate way, but utter contempt nonetheless. I despise certain behaviors. One behavior clearly stands out as the most detestable on earth: The kafir (unbelievers) trying to trying to lecture me on morality or even trying to shame me. These people are despicable subhuman dogshit. I spit, pee, and shit on that kind of individuals.

[accelafine]

If you feel 'shamed' then that's something for you to contemplate. I wasn't even thinking about it

[promethean75]

While i would not spit, pee or poo on moral lecturers who do not tolerate the vast majority of peaceful Muslims or what they believe, i might certainly fart in their general direction as a gesture of disapproval and contempt.

[accelafine]

Virtue-signalling at its 'finest'. You are a good and lovely human being. We get it. Shame about the paedophilia though