Puberty blockers

[accelafine]

Here's a mystery. Why would grown men want to promote the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? Could anyone think of a reason for this? Puberty blockers keep children looking prepubescent until the age of consent and beyond. Men...prepubescent children... What's the connection?
Another mystery. Why would gay-hating parents with a non 'sex stereotype' child (i.e. a boy who likes playing with dolls, a girl who doesn't) decide that their 'boy' is actually a 'girl' 'in the wrong body' and vice versa? Why would a parent like that think that it's preferable to have a 'straight girl' than a 'gay boy'? Hmm? What's the connection?

When I was growing up ALL girls were apparently 'boys'. The American 'pretty princess pink and purple' phony bullshit hadn't yet permeated the rest of the planet. We all climbed trees, made forts, had short hair...Imagine planting the mind virus into those children's developing brains that they were 'in the wrong body'. Think of the harm that it would have done. That would have been unthinkable right? That could never happen...

[Gary Childress]

Here's a mystery. Why would grown men want to promote the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? Could anyone think of a reason for this? Puberty blockers keep children looking like prepubescent until the age of consent and beyond. Men...prepubescent children... What's the connection?
Another mystery. Why would gay-hating parents with a non 'sex stereotype' child (i.e. a boy who likes playing with dolls, a girl who doesn't) decide that their 'boy' is actually a 'girl' 'in the wrong body' and vice versa? Why would a parent like that think that it's preferable to have a 'straight girl' than a 'gay boy'? Hmm? What's the connection?

When I was growing up ALL girls were apparently 'boys'. The American 'pretty princess pink and purple' phony bullshit hadn't yet permeated the rest of the planet. We all climbed trees, made forts, wore jeans, had short hair...Imagine planting the mind virus into those children's developing brains that they are 'in the wrong body'. Think of the harm that it would have done. That would have been unthinkable right? That could never happen...

Are there people promoting the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? If so, it's probably linked to pharmaceutical sales somehow. Pharmaceutical companies actively lobby doctors and hospitals for their products, sometimes leading to overprescription.

[accelafine]

There are a lot of adults with something to gain. It's a huge industry. But it starts with planting the idea in a child's mind. Mengele doctors are making millions from doing this to vulnerable, often autistic, young people.

breast removal.jpg

[Immanuel Can]

Here's a mystery. Why would grown men want to promote the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? Could anyone think of a reason for this? Puberty blockers keep children looking like prepubescent until the age of consent and beyond. Men...prepubescent children... What's the connection?
Another mystery. Why would gay-hating parents with a non 'sex stereotype' child (i.e. a boy who likes playing with dolls, a girl who doesn't) decide that their 'boy' is actually a 'girl' 'in the wrong body' and vice versa? Why would a parent like that think that it's preferable to have a 'straight girl' than a 'gay boy'? Hmm? What's the connection?

When I was growing up ALL girls were apparently 'boys'. The American 'pretty princess pink and purple' phony bullshit hadn't yet permeated the rest of the planet. We all climbed trees, made forts, wore jeans, had short hair...Imagine planting the mind virus into those children's developing brains that they are 'in the wrong body'. Think of the harm that it would have done. That would have been unthinkable right? That could never happen...

Are there people promoting the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? If so, it's probably linked to pharmaceutical sales somehow. Pharmaceutical companies actively lobby doctors and hospitals for their products, sometimes leading to overprescription.

Close. There's HUGE money in it, for one thing. A full "transgender" surgery costs about 63,000 US dollars. And that doesn't even get into the previous and follow-up treatments constantly needed to sustain it. But I think there's also an ideological motive involved, as well. For some, it's a virtue-signalling opportunity in the Munchausen style. For others, it's the ultimate expression of Queer Theory, in which everything normal is automatically traduced and twisted in order to "queer" it, just as D. Halperin espoused in the first significant paper on the subject, "The Normalization of Queer Theory." For others, it's a Neo-Marxist cause: another "oppressed" group that can be made permanently unhappy and thus make useful "revolutionaries." All these groups have their own reasons for advocating it.

In short, there are lots of reasons, but no good ones.

[seeds]

There are a lot of adults with something to gain. It's a huge industry. But it starts with planting the idea in a child's mind. Mengele doctors are making millions from doing this to vulnerable, often autistic, young people.

Another mystery (to me, anyway) has to do with the parents of children like Jazz Jennings, for example, who was born a boy.

According to Wiki (bracketed interjections mine)...

Her ["his"] parents noted that Jennings was clear on being female as soon as she ["he"] could speak....

...She ["he"] stars in the TLC reality TV series, I Am Jazz, which premiered in 2015 and focuses on her ["his"] daily life with her ["his"] family and the challenges she ["he"] faces as a transgender person.

And the mystery is that if you're a parent who (for whatever reason) is hell-bent on screwing up your child's body and life with hormone therapy because when they were 4 or 5 years old, they somehow imagined themselves as being born in the wrong body,...

...then if the idiot parents and doctors are going to do it anyway, then why not treat them with the drugs and hormones that will make them feel more at home in the body they were born with, instead of perpetuating the "Frankenstein-ish" insanity displayed in the image uploaded by accelafine?
_______

[accelafine]

There are a lot of adults with something to gain. It's a huge industry. But it starts with planting the idea in a child's mind. Mengele doctors are making millions from doing this to vulnerable, often autistic, young people.

Another mystery (to me, anyway) has to do with the parents of children like Jazz Jennings, for example, who was born a boy.

According to Wiki (bracketed interjections mine)...

Her ["his"] parents noted that Jennings was clear on being female as soon as she ["he"] could speak....

...She ["he"] stars in the TLC reality TV series, I Am Jazz, which premiered in 2015 and focuses on her ["his"] daily life with her ["his"] family and the challenges she ["he"] faces as a transgender person.

And the mystery is that if you're a parent who (for whatever reason) is hell-bent on screwing up your child's body and life with hormone therapy because when they were 4 or 5 years old, they somehow imagined themselves as being born in the wrong body,...

...then if the idiot parents and doctors are going to do it anyway, then why not treat them with the drugs and hormones that will make them feel more at home in the body they were born with, instead of perpetuating the "Frankenstein-ish" insanity displayed in the image uploaded by accelafine?
_______

What??

[seeds]

There are a lot of adults with something to gain. It's a huge industry. But it starts with planting the idea in a child's mind. Mengele doctors are making millions from doing this to vulnerable, often autistic, young people.

Another mystery (to me, anyway) has to do with the parents of children like Jazz Jennings, for example, who was born a boy.

According to Wiki (bracketed interjections mine)...

Her ["his"] parents noted that Jennings was clear on being female as soon as she ["he"] could speak....

...She ["he"] stars in the TLC reality TV series, I Am Jazz, which premiered in 2015 and focuses on her ["his"] daily life with her ["his"] family and the challenges she ["he"] faces as a transgender person.

And the mystery is that if you're a parent who (for whatever reason) is hell-bent on screwing up your child's body and life with hormone therapy because when they were 4 or 5 years old, they somehow imagined themselves as being born in the wrong body,...

...then if the idiot parents and doctors are going to do it anyway, then why not treat them with the drugs and hormones that will make them feel more at home in the body they were born with, instead of perpetuating the "Frankenstein-ish" insanity displayed in the image uploaded by accelafine?
_______

What??

Please explain why my reply prompted a - "What??" - from you?
_______

[attofishpi]

Another mystery. Why would gay-hating parents with a non 'sex stereotype' child (i.e. a boy who likes playing with dolls, a girl who doesn't) decide that their 'boy' is actually a 'girl' 'in the wrong body' and vice versa? Why would a parent like that think that it's preferable to have a 'straight girl' than a 'gay boy'? Hmm? What's the connection?

Fuck nose - my sisters dolls (orchestrated by me) used to have lesbian orgies (I wouldn't even let my Action Man watch or partake).

I suppose in this day and age the adults would have deemed me as a girl in a boys body just cause I liked playing with sexy girl dolls rather than macho wanker GI Joe - that didnt turn me on - then fucked me right up with hormone shit - I could have been by now one of those dudes that nobody can discern how to address them. Heck, I might have had my cock chopped off and shoved inside - and of course I'd attempt to convice all the sexy chicks I am a lesbian.

(WHAT A FUCKED UP WORLD)

[Gary Childress]

Here's a mystery. Why would grown men want to promote the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? Could anyone think of a reason for this? Puberty blockers keep children looking like prepubescent until the age of consent and beyond. Men...prepubescent children... What's the connection?
Another mystery. Why would gay-hating parents with a non 'sex stereotype' child (i.e. a boy who likes playing with dolls, a girl who doesn't) decide that their 'boy' is actually a 'girl' 'in the wrong body' and vice versa? Why would a parent like that think that it's preferable to have a 'straight girl' than a 'gay boy'? Hmm? What's the connection?

When I was growing up ALL girls were apparently 'boys'. The American 'pretty princess pink and purple' phony bullshit hadn't yet permeated the rest of the planet. We all climbed trees, made forts, wore jeans, had short hair...Imagine planting the mind virus into those children's developing brains that they are 'in the wrong body'. Think of the harm that it would have done. That would have been unthinkable right? That could never happen...

Are there people promoting the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? If so, it's probably linked to pharmaceutical sales somehow. Pharmaceutical companies actively lobby doctors and hospitals for their products, sometimes leading to overprescription.

Close. There's HUGE money in it, for one thing. A full "transgender" surgery costs about 63,000 US dollars. And that doesn't even get into the previous and follow-up treatments constantly needed to sustain it. But I think there's also an ideological motive involved, as well. For some, it's a virtue-signalling opportunity in the Munchausen style. For others, it's the ultimate expression of Queer Theory, in which everything normal is automatically traduced and twisted in order to "queer" it, just as D. Halperin espoused in the first significant paper on the subject, "The Normalization of Queer Theory." For others, it's a Neo-Marxist cause: another "oppressed" group that can be made permanently unhappy and thus make useful "revolutionaries." All these groups have their own reasons for advocating it.

In short, there are lots of reasons, but no good ones.

That's sad. As often happens, it sounds like big business is profiting enormously off of all this. That usually leads to overdiagnosis and overprescription. (At least it did for Prozac and the opioid epidemic.)

[accelafine]

Are there people promoting the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? If so, it's probably linked to pharmaceutical sales somehow. Pharmaceutical companies actively lobby doctors and hospitals for their products, sometimes leading to overprescription.

Close. There's HUGE money in it, for one thing. A full "transgender" surgery costs about 63,000 US dollars. And that doesn't even get into the previous and follow-up treatments constantly needed to sustain it. But I think there's also an ideological motive involved, as well. For some, it's a virtue-signalling opportunity in the Munchausen style. For others, it's the ultimate expression of Queer Theory, in which everything normal is automatically traduced and twisted in order to "queer" it, just as D. Halperin espoused in the first significant paper on the subject, "The Normalization of Queer Theory." For others, it's a Neo-Marxist cause: another "oppressed" group that can be made permanently unhappy and thus make useful "revolutionaries." All these groups have their own reasons for advocating it.

In short, there are lots of reasons, but no good ones.

That's sad. As often happens, it sounds like big business is profiting enormously off of all this. That usually leads to overdiagnosis and overprescription. (At least it did for Prozac and the opioid epidemic.)

Except that here we are talking about mutilation, sterility, life-long health problems. There's no going back from it.

[accelafine]

Apparently caring about this is part of 'extreme right wing' ideology. FFS. People on here are brain-dead.

[Gary Childress]

Apparently caring about this is part of 'extreme right wing' ideology. FFS. People on here are brain-dead.

I wasn't disagreeing with you. The abuses usually tie into big businesses seeking profit. It's how corporations work and it can be pretty sick at times. I've worked for corporations before. I never will again after all the unethical shit I've witnessed.

[accelafine]

Another mystery (to me, anyway) has to do with the parents of children like Jazz Jennings, for example, who was born a boy.

According to Wiki (bracketed interjections mine)...

And the mystery is that if you're a parent who (for whatever reason) is hell-bent on screwing up your child's body and life with hormone therapy because when they were 4 or 5 years old, they somehow imagined themselves as being born in the wrong body,...

...then if the idiot parents and doctors are going to do it anyway, then why not treat them with the drugs and hormones that will make them feel more at home in the body they were born with, instead of perpetuating the "Frankenstein-ish" insanity displayed in the image uploaded by accelafine?
_______

What??

Please explain why my reply prompted a - "What??" - from you?
_______

My apology. I misread. Why give them ANY drugs? There's a cure for these children--it's called puberty. They don't stand a chance when they have transhausen parents who are determined to make their child a 'fashion accessory'. Do you think it's just a coincidence that so many American celebrities have 'trans' children, sometimes multiple?

[accelafine]

''Martine Rothblatt is the founder and chairwoman of the board of United Therapeutics. He was also the CEO of GeoStar and the creator of SiriusXM Satellite Radio. He was the top earning CEO in the pharmaceutical industry in 2018.

[Immanuel Can]

Are there people promoting the non-medical use of puberty blockers on healthy children? If so, it's probably linked to pharmaceutical sales somehow. Pharmaceutical companies actively lobby doctors and hospitals for their products, sometimes leading to overprescription.

Close. There's HUGE money in it, for one thing. A full "transgender" surgery costs about 63,000 US dollars. And that doesn't even get into the previous and follow-up treatments constantly needed to sustain it. But I think there's also an ideological motive involved, as well. For some, it's a virtue-signalling opportunity in the Munchausen style. For others, it's the ultimate expression of Queer Theory, in which everything normal is automatically traduced and twisted in order to "queer" it, just as D. Halperin espoused in the first significant paper on the subject, "The Normalization of Queer Theory." For others, it's a Neo-Marxist cause: another "oppressed" group that can be made permanently unhappy and thus make useful "revolutionaries." All these groups have their own reasons for advocating it.

In short, there are lots of reasons, but no good ones.

That's sad. As often happens, it sounds like big business is profiting enormously off of all this. That usually leads to overdiagnosis and overprescription. (At least it did for Prozac and the opioid epidemic.)

That's the thing, Gary...and yes, it's sad. You know what's even sadder? The suppression of the "Detransers." These are people who originally fully bought into the lie, and as a consequence, butchered their own bodies and mangled their social and sexual lives, shortened their own lifespan, gave themselves diseases like osteoporosis and sterility, and so on...and now are not allowed to speak about their experience, because the "Trans" lobby is so powerfully backed. This is a case of "Transers" devouring their own. And it's a horrendous injustice.