The nature of consciousnes is the awareness of forms where the form is imprinted on the psyche and inverting to a further form. It is the nature of forms occuring through forms, where each form is a phenomena observed "as is" where a form is observed as evident by existence alone. This inversion of one form to another, which sets the foundation for counting, and all measurement as label application by default, hence reasoning by default, again reflects the dichotomy between what is abstract and what is empirical.
It is this dualism between the abstraction and physical that underlies a common middle context of "form" which binds reality together.
An example of this would be a house.
Does a house gain structure through the materials or the form? It is the form which binds the materials together with space acting as the glue which holds the house together. The house exists because of rectangles and triangles, not because of the wooden beams. Matter is shape.
Under a unified version of the universe, where all exists as one, movement becomes static and is observed as only an approximation of the one. This movement is expressed through form, where form is a summation of movements.
For example a car going about in circles shows a series of movements. From a seperate time zone, where all movements exist as one, the cars movements appear as a static circle. These movements cannot occur excepting through a looping pattern through which they result. All potential movement, given a car driving in circles in actual time, is derived from a form which transcends all the movements...ie the loop in this case.
Movement exists through form, where form acts as the glue which holds reality together. Thus static forms are instrumental in determining the movements of the phenomenon. The car moves only because the loop exists, the car does not create the loop, the loop creates the movements of the car. Each movement of the car is an approximation, a part of, the loop through which it manifests.
The same applies to a logical argument, does an argument gain structure through propositions or form? It is the form which binds the propositions together. The argument exists because of linearism, circularity and the point of awareness it represents.
This form occurs through recursion, where one phenomena repeats into another.