Philosophy as Preordained Definition Mapping 2

[Eodnhoj7]

Philosophy is the manifestation of "isms", through the manifestation of thetical and antithetical dichotomies, which synthesize to produce further definitions. These "isms" represent the general state of a series of particulars. It is definition creation through the diverging and reconverging of dualisms, with no set rule in defining where and when to apply the application of dichotomy creation, yet this dichotomy is fundamental a fundamental rule.

This dichotomy can be applied anywhere within philosophical enquiring thus necessitating philosophy as subject to not just an infinite number of thesis and antithesis, but an infinite number of synthetic answers as well. Philosophy's application of dichotomies, through any series of propositions, necessitates it as fundamentally undefined as the application of dichotomies can be represented under a continuum. This further necessitates definition as a process, with this process following a set of finite rules. The manifestation of defintion is in itself defined.

What is not infinite is the fact the dichotomy, as an act of division in definitions, is the one primary principle philosophy contains. The creation of a thesis and antithesis necessitates philosophy as founded under a principle of isomorphism. The thesis occurs, and Inverts into an opposing antithesis, thus grounding the dualism as a process of inversion from one state into a symmetrically opposite other.

Philosophy is isomorphic in nature, through the manifestation of a dichotomy. In simpler terms the dichotomy is inseperable from a principle of isomorphism which determines definition as definition itself. Even the application of dichotomy and isomorphism as key principles creates a dualistic tension between the quantitative nature of a dichotomy and the qualitative nature of isomorphism. Philosophy begins with a tension of quality and quantity as a thesis and antithesis. The tension between the thesis and antithesis requires an alternation between these two forms around a center point of an absense of definition that the tension seeks to define. The beginning of quality and quantity is mediated by a term which is completely absent of definition.


The synthesis of these opposing states necessitate the amalgamation of the thesis and antithesis, in a synthetic state as the recursion of key variables within the thesis into a new form. Quality manifests into a tautology of further qualities, quantities follow this same nature respectively.

This tautology can be represented, under the variables (A--> (B<-->-A)) or the quantities of (1-->(2<--->-1)) repsectively where the formless state, either the variable (• --> •) or (0-->0), is the negation of what is formless into two forms that are isomorphic to the original state of formlessness. In simpler terms the isomorphism begins with a completely formless state inverting to a state of form with these forms observing another state of thesis and antithesis. The formless nature of the original assertion takes form by inverting into an opposing set of forms, with these forms occuring under another set of opposing states. 0 inverts to 1, and 1 inverts to 2. An empty assumption Inverts to a an actual context, and this context Inverts to another context. 2 maintains a difference of 1, resulting in 1 forming -1 as an antithesis, and A maintains a difference from B as -A, resulting in A forming -A as an antithesis.

Isomorphism, is thus paradoxically isomorphic. On one hand it is expressed through the dichotomy of being and nothing, dually it is expressed through the dichotomy of one being and multiple beings. Isomorphism, as a dichotomy, is expressed through a meta dichotomy with this being a dichotomy as well.


The synthetic state, as the mediation between opposites is thus grounded in a tautology of the thesis. The process of definition, through the dichotomy, is premised upon a key term which is absent in definition by nature in which the thesis and antithesis seek to define. The application of a percieved formless, underlies the nature of philosophy resulting in a loop of interplaying opposites that are determined as a means of defining it through the creation of a new term. This creation of a new term makes philosophy a dynamic process of continuing definitions where tautology of definition is as much a dynamic state as it is a static one.

[TheVisionofEr]

Philosophy is the manifestation of "isms",

This is to identify philosophy (e.g., science as such) with a particular qualified form of philosophy called, usually, analytic. And associated, at bottom, with the foundation of Russel and Whitehead who defined the analytic against the Kantian sense. (Of course, more could be said about this little nitch in the proximate branch of philosophy or science with respect to it chief figure and basis in history.) dixi

[Eodnhoj7]

Philosophy is the manifestation of "isms",

This is to identify philosophy (e.g., science as such) with a particular qualified form of philosophy called, usually, analytic. And associated, at bottom, with the foundation of Russel and Whitehead who defined the analytic against the Kantian sense. (Of course, more could be said about this little nitch in the proximate branch of philosophy or science with respect to it chief figure and basis in history.) dixi

Dualism applies to analytic and nonanalytic philosophy, the nature of dichotomy is a foundational form of definition within and beyond philosophy.

[TheVisionofEr]

Dualism applies to analytic and nonanalytic philosophy, the nature of dichotomy is a foundational form of definition within and beyond philosophy.

In Russel definition is thought as basically arbitrary. In Kant it is a matter of the observation of what seems reasonable. Kant assumes the human being has reason. But, this is not an analytic foundation in the Russel / Whitehead sense; it is the observation of life based on sound human opinion.

[Eodnhoj7]

Dualism applies to analytic and nonanalytic philosophy, the nature of dichotomy is a foundational form of definition within and beyond philosophy.

In Russel definition is thought as basically arbitrary. In Kant it is a matter of the observation of what seems reasonable. Kant assumes the human being has reason. But, this is not an analytic foundation in the Russel / Whitehead sense; it is the observation of life based on sound human opinion.

It is grounded in assumed assertions, what we understand of assumptions are formless with this formlessness allowing for an imprintation of one phenomenon on another.

[TheVisionofEr]

what we understand of assumptions are formless

If something is understood by someone it seems necessary that it exist. As the form of understanding.

On the other hand, something could exist that is not understood. However, we would know nothing of it.

So, everything that is known is understood as a form or pattern of thing in the intelligence. Even the distinction between understanding and the eyes.