Philosophy Now Forum

You're missing the word "would" and then "allow" but since there never will be such an entity you're also missing the words "In my fantasy ...".

Arising_uk wrote:You're missing the word "would" and then "allow" but since there never will be such an entity you're also missing the words "In my fantasy ...".

Unfortunately, a dumbhead like you is unable to even discuss the issue, much less have an opinion.

I own very little, so, under Bob's plan, my tax would be low.

I would prefer, however, to pay a little more and only pay for the services and products I use.

For example: I'm on the roads a lot...my office is my car...I would willingly pay a road tax (with the understanding, of course, the money I pony up goes only to the upkeep of the roads).

As it is: I pay a lot and have never gotten an accurate accounting of where any of that money goes, how it's spent. The best I've been able to get (from federal and state govs) is a generalized 'collected and spent' accounting whch tells me nuthin' at all.

henry quirk wrote:I own very little, so, under Bob's plan, my tax would be low.

I would prefer, however, to pay a little more and only pay for the services and products I use.

For example: I'm on the roads a lot...my office is my car...I would willingly pay a road tax (with the understanding, of course, the money I pony up goes only to the upkeep of the roads).

As it is: I pay a lot and have never gotten an accurate accounting of where any of that money goes, how it's spent. The best I've been able to get (from federal and state govs) is a generalized 'collected and spent' accounting whch tells me nuthin' at all.

How the government spends tax money is another issue, but the AEP would address it in due course to keep the tax rate as low as possible. And keep in mind, there would be no income taxes, sales taxes or the myriad of other taxes and fees that are currently being collected.

This church is far more interesting than the AEP that only exists in the mind of Bob:

http://indy100.independent.co.uk/articl ... W1QnUWN2Rg

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:This church is far more interesting than the AEP that only exists in the mind of Bob.

I can understand why a person who doesn't pay any taxes now wouldn't be interested in the subject.

bobevenson wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:This church is far more interesting than the AEP that only exists in the mind of Bob.

I can understand why a person who doesn't pay any taxes now wouldn't be interested in the subject.

How much are you fleecing the government for?

PhilX

bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, a dumbhead like you is unable to even discuss the issue, much less have an opinion.

You're a moron with the memory of a goldfish as you have posted this point umpteen times upon this forum and every time any discussion about the issue is raised you just revert to insult and invective as you have no intention of considering your idea from the others position and this is why I just point out that it's all your fantasy and will never come to anything as you'd have to leave your house and actually interact with others for such an event to occur.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Unfortunately, a dumbhead like you is unable to even discuss the issue, much less have an opinion.

You're a moron with the memory of a goldfish as you have posted this point umpteen times upon this forum and every time any discussion about the issue is raised you just revert to insult and invective as you have no intention of considering your idea from the others position and this is why I just point out that it's all your fantasy and will never come to anything as you'd have to leave your house and actually interact with others for such an event to occur.

If you've actually got a comment to make, please make it, but spare me your usual gobbledygook!

bobevenson wrote:property being defined as anything with intrinsic market value.

That's self contradictory. If value were intrinsic there wouldn't be a market.

FlashDangerpants wrote:

bobevenson wrote:property being defined as anything with intrinsic market value.

That's self contradictory. If value were intrinsic there wouldn't be a market.

Jesus Christ, stay away from economics, a subject you obviously know nothing about!

bobevenson wrote:

FlashDangerpants wrote:

bobevenson wrote:property being defined as anything with intrinsic market value.

That's self contradictory. If value were intrinsic there wouldn't be a market.

Jesus Christ, stay away from economics, a subject you obviously know nothing about!

You keep telling other people to argue the merits of the case with you rather than just calling you a pointless stupid twat.

But you don't like up to those ideals the way a prophet should.

bobevenson wrote:If you've actually got a comment to make, please make it, but spare me your usual gobbledygook!

See all my questions that you didn't reply to upon all the posts where you have raised this idea ad nauseum you goldfish.

The AEP allows nothing. It will never be in power. I'm not even certain it exists, save in your head, Bob.