The true " religion " - the creator orientation

[manden]

Because of the existence of the universe (everything) it lies near to suppose , that there is a creator of the universe ( can even be recognized ) .

MORE OF HIM IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE !

Out of the existence of the creator of the universe follows logically :

we must learn to treat his creation as well as possible - to live in real harmony with it .

THAT IS ALL ! Why is the mankind NOT ABLE to do that ? ? ?

Does anybody know it ?

[Jaded Sage]

Because many of us don't see it that way. You'll find some of that here. Do not let it deter you. I can see you have seen the truth. Remember to never forget how much the world needs people like you.

Now tell me more about the unrecognizable part of God.

[manden]

Jaded , thank you .
I must say the mankind the truth about the real creator of the universe - more of him is not recognizable .
But that he is the creator of the universe says enough - you must only think about .
From whom do we have reason , logic and moral ( the best we have ) ?
Why can't we use inthe right way ?
I give you the answer : because we can't recognize that the real creator of the universe really exists ( I could ) and so we cannot control our
egoism and megalomania more than a little .

[Hobbes' Choice]

Jaded , thank you .
I must say the mankind the truth about the real creator of the universe - more of him is not recognizable .
But that he is the creator of the universe says enough - you must only think about .
From whom do we have reason , logic and moral ( the best we have ) ?
Why can't we use inthe right way ?
I give you the answer : because we can't recognize that the real creator of the universe really exists ( I could ) and so we cannot control our
egoism and megalomania more than a little .

If you think you know the mind of god, you personify arrogance, and megalomania.
You really need to find a religious forum.
THis is PHILOSOPHY.

[manden]

Philosophy is right for me , because I have no religion , and I know that all religions are wrong .

What I know I have recognized in more than ten years intensive search for the truth after the true God , completely honest and with all my strength

and WITHOUT fixations . I cannot say if the true God helped , but it is possible .

[Jaded Sage]

Keep it up then, homie.

[manden]

Who can , must obey the true God .

[Obvious Leo]

Fuck off and preach your bullshit to those who have the stomach for it. This is a philosophy forum and this sort of crap is way out of order.

[Jaded Sage]

Can I be a total dick for a second? A large part of what happens on this forum is not philosophy, and his rambles are more entertaining (at least to me) than the insult fights I'm used to seeing around here. Keep it up, bro. At least you have love and and sincerity in your heart. We could learn from an an example like you.

[Obvious Leo]

Can I be a total dick for a second?

You've never felt the need to ask permission before so knock yourself out. I doubt that many people here get too offended about people making foolish comments but preaching in a philosophy forum is conduct totally out of order. I have no doubt that there are thousands of other websites on the internet where consenting adults with similar fetishes can congregate to share their fantasies but to parade such infantile garbage here is beyond the pale.

[Jaded Sage]

I dunno, man. A lot of what I see is exactly that: infantile garbage. Perhaps if he keeps it in the Philosophy of Religion section. He technically is answering the question, "What is he/she like?" that is the subforum's description. I've seen at least one other do the same shit kinda and never seen anyone bother them about it. Maybe I just missed it. I think there's a language barrier that makes it harder.

[Obvious Leo]

Bob Evenson does exactly the same thing except he does it in large font and bold type. He blasts out his opinions on the assumption that his audience is just a group of ignorant shitheads who need to be shown the true light, but he never troubles to support his simplistic views with anything approaching a reasoned argument. I'm not presuming to speak for the other members here but I personally find this sort of behaviour both offensive and contrary to the objectives of a forum such as this.

[Jaded Sage]

It seems like they are reaching out and don't have any other place to go. A Christian forum would reject him outright, and other religious forums are often filled with atheist trolls. This place is small enough for them to be safe. I think this might be the best place for them, and I say they are welcome. And let's be honest, what they contribute is less counter-productive than anything the insults contribute. They're not hurting anyone, and they are even sorta kinda helping. This guy brought an entirely new idea to my mind: that a part of God is unrecognizable. That's an original thought. We need as much of that around here as we can get.

[Obvious Leo]

JS. The practice of religion is widespread and religious belief must therefore be regarded as a genuine psychological and sociological phenomenon. As such it is a legitimate subject for philosophical enquiry on those terms. However the existence or non-existence of the supernatural is NOT a legitimate topic for philosophical enquiry because it is a question placed beyond the reach of such enquiry by its very definition.

[Jaded Sage]

Aren't there a lot of philosophers who talk about that? Either way, it is in the description of this subforum, so he is technically following the rules. On the other hand, I never saw anything that said insults are part of the discussion, which means he's following the rules more than many, if not most, of the others. But the subforum description still stands, so I suppose you'll have to take it up with.... the creator...? lol