The KJV Bible as Edited in 1947 and Later is Invalid

[bobevenson]

At that date and forward, in Revelation 2:6, the word "Nicolaitanes" is spelled "Nicolaitans." "Nicolaitanes" is an anagram for "O satanic line," a reference to the beast line of the Ouzo Cross.

[mickthinks]

It is your Ouzo Cross that is invalid, I think you'll find, Bob.

[bobevenson]

Although the word "Nicolaitanes" precedes the KJV Bible, the original 1611 edition spelled it "Nicolaitans." The letter "e" was added and dropped with future editions, like a beacon to its allegorical nature. Who but Bob the Baptist could have ever pointed this out to you? By the way, the KJV was written by 47 scholars and edited by 12. The beast line of the Ouzo Cross starts at reference point 47 and extends 12 units as described in "The Ouzo Prophecy."

[mickthinks]

Your "Ouzo Prophecy"; that's also invalid.

[bobevenson]

xxx

[bobevenson]

Your "Ouzo Prophecy"; that's also invalid.

Wait a minute, please explain how it would be possible for the spokesman of the ultra-conservative Spiritual Counterfeits Project to be blown away by the paper except through divine intervention.

[Dalek Prime]

Please tell me you didn't finally lose it, and blow some poor sod away, Bob?

[bobevenson]

Please tell me you didn't finally lose it, and blow some poor sod away, Bob?

Check it out, my friend, at http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/spiritual ... rfeits.pdf, the only person on the face of the Earth who understands it. The reason I refer to divine intervention is that a professor of English at Writer's Digest said, "I read your paper, reread it, and then read it again. The average person wouldn't know what you're talking about, what the point is, what you're trying to say. Your paper is something, but it's only something, and I reluctantly confess, I'm not at all certain what that something is."

[Dalek Prime]

Ummm, Bob? He's saying he's not certain what you're saying.... Just saying....

[bobevenson]

Ummm, Bob? He's saying he's not certain what you're saying.... Just saying....

Yes, that's what he's saying. My point is that if a professor of English can't figure out what "The Ouzo Prophecy" is about, how would anybody else be able to? You might wonder why I sent the paper to the Spiritual Counterfeits Project in the first place. Originally, I had sent the paper to various Biblical commentators, and their comment was invariably some version of "I don't understand it." I assumed they were just saying that to avoid giving me their harsh opinion. I came across the SCP, and figured they wouldn't hesitate to speak frankly and attack the paper. To say I was surprised by their response would be an understatement. It was only after I received the English professor's letter that I realized the Biblical commentators were being truthful when they said they didn't understand the paper, and that the response from the SCP spokesman, the only person on Earth who has even admitted to understanding the paper, must surely have been divinely inspired.