Philosophy Now Forum

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:40 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:09 pmExactly how pure must these lady gardens be in order to secure your approval?

Obviously young ladies must be virgin and chaste, in order to marry in the Only-Real-And-True Church.

I see. So they can flick the bean, maybe a little light scissoring with a girlfriend at weekends. But no dick. Glad we could clear that up.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:42 am You're obviously the promiscuous, feminist, liberal type though, who hates the idea of your father looking out for you. Why is that, Veg?

Maybe she's all woke? You should ask her how woke she is.

Poor thing doesn't even know which comments are for him and which aren't

Although they probably apply equally to both of these freaks.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:43 amI see. So they can flick the bean, maybe a little light scissoring with a girlfriend at weekends. But no dick. Glad we could clear that up.

Leave it to your mind to take short-cuts and deceive...does that sound like Chastity? No, obviously not.

Therefore you've missed the point entirely, congratulations!

accelafine wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:46 amAlthough they probably apply equally to both of these freaks.

Why do you hate the idea that your father would have or should have looked out for your best interests, when you were a young, horny 14-year-old, Veg?

Did you fuck up, make mistakes? Did you get taken advantage of? And from thence on, you hated your father ever since?

Am I warm, cold, hot, off the mark?? What's with your vengefulness against men?

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:47 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:43 amI see. So they can flick the bean, maybe a little light scissoring with a girlfriend at weekends. But no dick. Glad we could clear that up.

Leave it to your mind to take short-cuts and deceive...does that sound like Chastity? No, obviously not.

Therefore you've missed the point entirely, congratulations!

Oh wow... you mean nothing south of the equator at all? Not even a cheeky ring of the Devil's Doorbell?

I guess it's all got to be up top then. Soapy titwanks for all.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:57 amOh wow... you mean nothing south of the equator at all? Not even a cheeky ring of the Devil's Doorbell?

I guess it's all got to be up top then. Soapy titwanks for all.

[img]

Leave it to Liberals to fine-tune-focus on what can be gotten away with? Instead of what could be achieved??

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:08 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:57 amOh wow... you mean nothing south of the equator at all? Not even a cheeky ring of the Devil's Doorbell?

I guess it's all got to be up top then. Soapy titwanks for all.

[img]

Leave it to Liberals to fine-tune-focus on what can be gotten away with? Instead of what could be achieved??

Why? did you?? use so many quest?on marks when you ¿were just making a statement?

But I am glad I could help you work through your prudishness. Do we need to work out what sort of butt stuff is allowed?

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:37 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:46 pmAGAIN, you could NOT be MORE BLIND and STUPID, here.

AgeGPT, you need to turn down your Ad Hom settings, your counter-arguments are growing embarrassing for yourself.

But I HAVE NEVER MADE an 'ad hom', here.

AGAIN, I suggest you SEEK OUT and OBTAIN ACTUAL CLARITY, BEFORE you make ANY ASSUMPTIONS AT ALL.

Also, what is SAYING and WRITING, "AgeGPT", if 'it', itself, is NOT an ATTEMPT at an 'ad hom'?

By the way, I am NOT embarrassed AT ALL in regards to what I have been SAYING, and CLAIMING, here.

So, YOUR ASSUMPTION, here, could ALSO NOT BE ANY FURTHER FROM the ACTUAL Truth of things, here.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:37 am I'll address your concerns if and when you can shore them up with some relevancy, paragraphs, and subtract the personal attacks.

LOL AGAIN, I have NEVER EVER MADE A 'personal attack' ABSOLUTELY ANYWHERE, here, in this forum.

I STAND BY EVER WORD I SAY, and WRITE, here.

And, if you EVER GAIN ENOUGH COURAGE, then 'TRY' and CHALLENGE 'me' ON MY WORDS. I ALSO SUGGEST you ALSO QUESTION 'me' ON MY WORDS, here.

Also, YOUR EXCUSE for NOT ADDRESSING what I have POINTED OUT and SHOWN, above here, is FURTHER PROOF of just HOW WEAK 'your words and claims' REALLY ARE, here.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:40 am

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:09 pmExactly how pure must these lady gardens be in order to secure your approval?

Obviously young ladies must be virgin and chaste, in order to marry in the Only-Real-And-True Church.

What, exactly, even IS the so-claimed 'Only-Real-And-True Church', "wizard22"?

Also, HOW would ANY one KNOW IF a "female" has been masturbating, or NOT?

Or, can a "female" masturbate, fantasize, cum, and/or squirt to absolutely ANY thing, and STILL 'get married', to you, just as long as the hymen is in so-called 'contact'?

The MORE I 'LOOK INTO' your VIEWS and BELIEFS, here, the MORE you REALLY ARE A TWISTED and DISTORTED human being.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:20 amWhy? did you?? use so many quest?on marks when you ¿were just making a statement?

I'll let you figure that one out?

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:20 amBut I am glad I could help you work through your prudishness. Do we need to work out what sort of butt stuff is allowed?

No thanks, I'm good...

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:27 amBut I HAVE NEVER MADE an 'ad hom', here.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 1:46 pmAGAIN, you could NOT be MORE BLIND and STUPID, here.

Ummm, you kinda did, here, AgeGPT...

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:42 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:18 pmI think there's a word for fathers who inspect their daughters' hymens...

If you had a good father in your life, then you'd know that he knows whether you're promiscuous or not.

If "vegetariantaxidermy" had a "father" who LOOKED INTO her vagina, or LET ANOTHER one, to see if "she" was a virgin or not, then I think "vegetariantaxidermy", "accelfine", and a great deal of MANY other human beings would say that "that father" was NOT a 'good father' AT ALL.

But, if 'you' want to go DELVING INTO "your daughter's" vagina/s, to CHECK that 'they' were virgins, and you WANT TO BELIEVE that by you DOING SO makes you a so-called "good father", then by ALL MEANS KEEP BELIEVING 'this'.

I, however, think you WILL FIND NOT MANY AT ALL agreeing WITH you, here.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:42 am You're obviously the promiscuous, feminist, liberal type though, who hates the idea of your father looking out for you. Why is that, Veg?

LOL ANOTHER PRIME example of FORMING A CONCLUSION, based upon NOTHING but the MOST ABSURD self-MADE UP ASSUMPTION.

Wizard22 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 9:42 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Jan 04, 2025 7:42 pmUnsurprising, from a sexless man who obviously knows nothing about women or their anatomy (and gets his 'knowledge' from porn)

You got me...

I've never had sex.
I've never been married.
I've never had children.

Any other slanders tonight?? Keep throwing those darts Veg!

Was 'that one' even talking TO 'you', above here?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Jan 05, 2025 10:38 amIf "vegetariantaxidermy" had a "father" who LOOKED INTO her vagina, or LET ANOTHER one, to see if "she" was a virgin or not, then I think "vegetariantaxidermy", "accelfine", and a great deal of MANY other human beings would say that "that father" was NOT a 'good father' AT ALL.

But, if 'you' want to go DELVING INTO "your daughter's" vagina/s, to CHECK that 'they' were virgins, and you WANT TO BELIEVE that by you DOING SO makes you a so-called "good father", then by ALL MEANS KEEP BELIEVING 'this'.

I, however, think you WILL FIND NOT MANY AT ALL agreeing WITH you, here.

You're wrong, AgeGPT.

Any and every reasonable father doesn't want his biological daughter being sexually harassed, assaulted, or abused. That would also fall under "checking your daughter's Hymen / Sexual Innocence / Wellbeing". They're one-and-the-same. What societies really, really need to be worried about...are fathers who don't even care or are simply absent in the first place.

You know...Secular Society???