Page 7 of 9
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:23 am
by Iwannaplato
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:33 am
So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.
Oh, I should have praised you for noticing that when I use your empty tactics it is a deterioration. I can only hope you realize the implications of seeing your own game playing as a deterioration.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
by Age
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:42 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:33 am
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 5:57 am
Concluding that I concluded some thing here, based on inadequate evidence, is you, "yourself', once again, doing the exact same thing, by presuming, concluding, and believing some thing is true without without first obtaining and having adequate evidence and proof.
Really?
So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.
I understand that you may not be able to get the point of what I did there, but since I am not necessarily communicating with you, I am not necessarily concerned about your lack of understanding.
And the Fact that you attempt so hard to deflect away from what I pointed out about your absolute hypocrisy here, says and reveals a lot about you.
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:41 pm
by Age
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:23 am
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:33 am
So, you have deteriorated 'this far', 'now'.
Oh, I should have praised you for noticing that when I use your empty tactics it is a deterioration. I can only hope you realize the implications of seeing your own game playing as a deterioration.
you obviously, once more, MISSED the actual point I was making there.
If you would like to, also, become aware of it, then let me know and I will spell it out for you.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
by Iwannaplato
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
You are a very poor mindreader.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
by Flannel Jesus
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
You are a very poor mindreader.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
by Flannel Jesus
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
Hilarious that people would ask questions like this, back in the days when this was written.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:14 pm
by Iwannaplato
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
You are a very poor mindreader.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:46 pm
by Age
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
You are a very poor mindreader.
Wow, the 'maturity' shown here.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:51 pm
by Age
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:39 pm
Are you ever able to just stay focused on just at least 'one discussion', fully, and see that through, without always having to go on 'the attack of' 'the other', in the hope that you will be seen in some sort of 'superiority perspective'?
You are a very poor mindreader.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
LOL It has already been informed of where and how this accusation of its is absolutely Wrong, and faulty. But, obviously, it missed or misunderstood that as well. Which absolutely totally understandable considering the way it looks at and sees things here, and because of the way that it assumes and believes things as well.
There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:53 pm
by Age
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 8:14 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
You are a very poor mindreader.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.
Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:54 pm
by Flannel Jesus
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:51 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 4:50 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 2:50 pm
You are a very poor mindreader.
Have you, back in the days when this was written, ever thought to just ask me if I'm a mind reader?
LOL It has already been informed of where and how this accusation of its is absolutely Wrong, and faulty. But, obviously, it missed or misunderstood that as well. Which absolutely totally understandable considering the way it looks at and sees things here, and because of the way that it assumes and believes things as well.
There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here.
Hilarious! If it wanted to do what it wants, then it doesn't even think about what it likes and then, LOL, it just gets stuck liking what it wants and licking what it sees.
Isn't it hilarious that people, in the days when this was written, wrote "There is no doubt at all that this one will keep believing, absolutely, what it does here."
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:01 pm
by Iwannaplato
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:53 pm
Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.
Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.
That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you...etc.
To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions. Be free.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
by Flannel Jesus
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:01 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:53 pm
Once again, for the very 'hard of hearing', and/or for the very 'slow at learning', I am not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with you posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind you "flannel jesus" that my intended target audience is not necessarily you nor any other poster here, would get tiresome to some.
Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.
That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.
To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.
He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
by Iwannaplato
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:01 pm
Age wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 9:53 pm
Thank you, it saves me from re-repeating this for those of who are 'hard of hearing', as some would say here.
That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.
To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.
He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.
And he succeeded.
Re: Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:07 pm
by Flannel Jesus
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:02 pm
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Sun Jun 23, 2024 10:01 pm
That saves you from doing that???? How odd: You're not here, in this forum, to necessarily communicate, better, with the posters here. If this happens and occurs, the so be it and all well and good. But, to keep having to remind posters here that my intended target audience is not necessarily you.
To remind us or them of these things is nothing that you are saved from doing by my actions.
He wouldn't want to clearly communicate his desire not to clearly communicate, after all.
And he succeeded.
What's the criteria for success here? People understanding his desire to not clearly communicate, or people not understanding?
If they understand, then there's the risk that something was accidentally clearly communicated