The Democrat Party Hates America

How should society be organised, if at all?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

mickthinks
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
Location: Augsburg

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by mickthinks »

Walker wrote: Sun Oct 06, 2024 6:37 pmSeeing as how FEMA was already looted ...
... that was the Trump administration. Nearly every accusation by the MAGAs is actually a concealed confession.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/29/poli ... index.html

Walker, did Trump lose the 2020 election?
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

“Every weather event or natural disaster that causes discomfort, damage, or death is attributed to 'climate change,' which in turn is said to require major changes in the quality of life, the capitalist system, a reduction in economic growth and prosperity, increased taxation and regulation, the surrender of national sovereignty to international governing organizations, and/or the significant expanse of domestic governmental power. Indeed, every house-hold product, from gas stoves, lightbulbs, and dishwashers to air conditioners, washing machines, automobiles, and anything else that uses energy, is now subject to government control.

“And since the time is said to be urgent, requiring instant and vast federally directed change to save the future of humanity, there is virtually no time for reflection, circumspection, or scientific and factual evaluation of past predictions and their accuracy (actually, inaccuracy) and the direction in which the nation is being forcibly plunged. The reason is that “climate change” is a politically and economically driven movement within the American Marxist framework that empowers the Democrat Party’s ability to control the behavior of the people.”
- Mark Levin, The Democrat Party Hates America, Language Control and Thought Control.

Commentary and Philosophical Puzzle: The climate is the ostensible cover for control of the population. Here’s the weird part. Those who know that the climate nonsense that is used for control of the population, and approve of the deception, need the lies. Why is that?

The same can be said for their POTUS candidate. Those who know that her qualifications are nonsense, approve of the deception that she is qualified for the office.

That is a strange club to belong to, isn't it.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

History will hate the Republican party

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Their continuing obsession with climategate conspiracy theories, and simple determination to accelerate that situation is what 21st Century Republican will be remembered and condemned for in the longer term. Gog the Orange Demagogue will be vaguely remembered as an oafish rapist who stole millions of dollars from delusional rubes, but the only event that will be seen as having consequence from the eera of his reign will be the inaction on climate matters.

Perhaps It will be assumed by future generations that this was the intent of that "infrastructure week" that kept being teased but never occurred.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

mickthinks wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 7:14 am Walker, did Trump lose the 2020 election?
Trump lawyer plays montage of Democrats objecting to 2016 election at Trump impeachment trial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umsAhEFHFKA

This is a video of Democrats objecting to the 2016 election results. The objections were not entertained because an objection requires senator approval. These objections did not have senator approval.

Objections to the 2020 election results did have senator approval. However, the objections were not entertained.

Instead, the election results were certified in a panic of emotion due to the January 6 riots at the Capital building, which was caused by inadequate crowd preparation and sparked by instigators who defied presidential instructions to peacefully make their voices heard.

The inadequate crowd preparation was caused by The Speaker of the House rejecting beefed up security offered by then President Trump, because Democrats were pushing their Defund The Police movement at that time, and they didn’t want the Cop optics. Trump could not order troops to protect the capitol building because that would instantly be spun by the Democrats as a military insurrection against the legislative branch by the executive branch.

This is interesting because the optics of a border wall didn’t stop them from fencing in the rotunda pronto after the riot, which only goes to show you the Democrat Philosophy … What’s good for We is not for Thee Deplorables. You folks can have open borders.

Now you know the rest of the story, beyond the bumper sticker. Now you can go forth with the good intent of Truth, Justice, and The American Way and understand what Democrat Party That Hates America is up to with their lies and deceit.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

The groundwork is now being laid for Trump's next impeachment, should he manage to be sworn into office as the next POTUS. The groundwork is being laid by The Democrat Party That Hates America.

Details to follow, in a few months. Stay tuned.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 8:52 am The groundwork is now being laid for Trump's next impeachment, should he manage to be sworn into office as the next POTUS. The groundwork is being laid by The Democrat Party That Hates America.

Details to follow, in a few months. Stay tuned.
I already pointed out how that groundwork was automatically laid down by the Supreme Court when they gave an immunity ruling that Trump couldn't face prosecution in criminal court for crimes committed as sitting president in his official capacity.

All the stuff Jack Smith has all that evidence and testimony for, but legally can't put before the courts in Florida or DC is therefore only presentable now in an impeachment trial before Congress. The case is red-hot and ready to go, it would be being heard already if the courts weren't gerrymandered.
mickthinks
Posts: 1816
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 1:10 am
Location: Augsburg

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by mickthinks »

Walker wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 8:46 am
Walker, can you not say that Trump lost the 2020 election?
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

mickthinks wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 2:55 pm
Walker wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 8:46 am
Walker, can you not say that Trump lost the 2020 election?
I can say that the nation no longer has confidence in the election results, and that's because of the clear explanation that you ignored. You obviously ignored it because it was too clear, and too understandable.

In other words, because The Democrat Party That Hates America corrupted yet another institution, The Vote, and removed protections from the vote, they accomplished this particular objective as a part of their long-term Fundamental Change program. (caps for emphasis)
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

Image

Comment: The governor of Florida (Republican) had diesel repair trucks positioned before the latest hurricane. What will future governors do if the The Democrat Party That Hates America succeeds in ignoring Nature’s Gift Of Energy?

Does the Democrat Party That Hates America want Americans to die in the aftermath of disasters because there is no energy, when they had energy available to repair the electrical power lines? Oh wait, without petroleum there won't be electricity in the lines but by then any folks still alive will have evolved back to the old skills of bucket carry, hand pumps, horse power, tallow candles rendered from increasingly scarce fat, and walking ... so never mind.

A case can be made for depraved indifference if folks start dying because The Democrats are actually successful in their mission to get rid of petroleum.

However, as usual, Leftist propaganda will find a fall guy for the problems caused by their success, and it will probably be Trump. Or God.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

.



Here is the trajectory of The Democrat Party:

The dirty little secret is, the Climate Fanatics do want petroleum.

However, they want government control of all the petroleum, and how it is used.

The government wants to determine how it gets used, based on the government's definition of need.


This dirty little secret trajectory evidences Leftist, Democrat hatred of America, and it also clashes with Truth, Justice, and The American Way.



.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 11:09 am
Walker wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 8:52 am The groundwork is now being laid for Trump's next impeachment, should he manage to be sworn into office as the next POTUS. The groundwork is being laid by The Democrat Party That Hates America.

Details to follow, in a few months. Stay tuned.
I already pointed out how that groundwork was automatically laid down by the Supreme Court when they gave an immunity ruling that Trump couldn't face prosecution in criminal court for crimes committed as sitting president in his official capacity.

All the stuff Jack Smith has all that evidence and testimony for, but legally can't put before the courts in Florida or DC is therefore only presentable now in an impeachment trial before Congress. The case is red-hot and ready to go, it would be being heard already if the courts weren't gerrymandered.
Bogus from the get-go.
Here is the Get-Go.

Special counsel Jack Smith wasn’t lawfully appointed, can’t prosecute Trump, legal scholars say
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... mith-wasn/
“President Reagan’s attorney general and two law professors who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are challenging special counsel Jack Smith’s authority to prosecute former President Donald Trump, saying a private citizen can’t bring criminal charges.

“Former Attorney General Edwin Meese and law professors Steven Calabresi and Gary Lawson said in a 25-page filing to the Supreme Court that Attorney General Merrick Garland had no constitutional or statuary authority to appoint Mr. Smith to conduct the high-level criminal investigation of Mr. Trump because he was a private citizen and not confirmed by the Senate.

“Mr. Smith worked as a U.S. attorney but was living in the Netherlands at the time of his appointment in November 2022, according to reports.”

*

Commentary:

In other words, Jack Smith is Joe-Blow given illegal authority, thus the fruit of the rotten seed ... is rotten.

The constitution was written with this brand of crap in mind.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:48 pm Special counsel Jack Smith wasn’t lawfully appointed, can’t prosecute Trump, legal scholars say
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... mith-wasn/
“President Reagan’s attorney general and two law professors who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are challenging special counsel Jack Smith’s authority to prosecute former President Donald Trump, saying a private citizen can’t bring criminal charges.
Five decades of special counsels appointed in the same way as Smith, and five decades of precedent since US V Nixon says otherwise.

But it's telling that you cannot rely on a defence of "he didn't do it" because... it would be better really if he hadn't done that stuff rather than needing loopholes to get away with it.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:54 pm
You're wrong. It all requires too many unsettled, novel and absurd interpretations of the law regarding presidential immunity, to be used as a political weapon with the coordinated purpose of keeping Trump out of office. That's what makes it lawfare. Jack Smith is a lawfare hitman and most importantly, he has no official capacity. His unproven legal opinions that are the basis of charges, that enables any asshole to supersede presidential authority, weakens if not destroys the office of the presidency, and the democratic process.

There's a reason why Harry Truman wasn't prosecuted for ended WWII.

The concerted effort to now destroy Trump is not to destroy the Trump the man. It's to destroy the office of the presidency. You know, weaken the institutions. Also on the hit list is the Supreme Court, another institution that gets The Fundamental Change Treatment.

The mechanism effecting this is the Democrat Party That Hates America, and that has been proven time and time again. Steele dossier, suppressing the corruption of The Biden Crime Family selling influence, ignoring laws for border protections passed by Congress for the benefit of the people, the list goes on.

The Democrat Party That Hates America is the hitman targeting what makes America, America.
Walker
Posts: 16383
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 12:00 am

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by Walker »

FlashDangerpants wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:54 pm
But it's telling that you cannot rely on a defence of "he didn't do it" because... it would be better really if he hadn't done that stuff rather than needing loopholes to get away with it.
What's telling is how you cling to the ignorance of your FSK and project it onto others, Flashdangerpants, and insist on assuming a self-appointed role as unlicensed elevator and escalator inspector. It makes you rather ... tedious.
User avatar
FlashDangerpants
Posts: 8815
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:54 pm

Re: The Democrat Party Hates America

Post by FlashDangerpants »

Walker wrote: Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:43 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:54 pm
You're wrong.
I'm not, I cited correct law for the matter you described.
Post Reply