... that was the Trump administration. Nearly every accusation by the MAGAs is actually a concealed confession.
https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/29/poli ... index.html
Walker, did Trump lose the 2020 election?
... that was the Trump administration. Nearly every accusation by the MAGAs is actually a concealed confession.
Trump lawyer plays montage of Democrats objecting to 2016 election at Trump impeachment trial
I already pointed out how that groundwork was automatically laid down by the Supreme Court when they gave an immunity ruling that Trump couldn't face prosecution in criminal court for crimes committed as sitting president in his official capacity.
I can say that the nation no longer has confidence in the election results, and that's because of the clear explanation that you ignored. You obviously ignored it because it was too clear, and too understandable.mickthinks wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 2:55 pmWalker, can you not say that Trump lost the 2020 election?

Bogus from the get-go.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 11:09 amI already pointed out how that groundwork was automatically laid down by the Supreme Court when they gave an immunity ruling that Trump couldn't face prosecution in criminal court for crimes committed as sitting president in his official capacity.
All the stuff Jack Smith has all that evidence and testimony for, but legally can't put before the courts in Florida or DC is therefore only presentable now in an impeachment trial before Congress. The case is red-hot and ready to go, it would be being heard already if the courts weren't gerrymandered.
Five decades of special counsels appointed in the same way as Smith, and five decades of precedent since US V Nixon says otherwise.Walker wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:48 pm Special counsel Jack Smith wasn’t lawfully appointed, can’t prosecute Trump, legal scholars say
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/20 ... mith-wasn/
“President Reagan’s attorney general and two law professors who clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia are challenging special counsel Jack Smith’s authority to prosecute former President Donald Trump, saying a private citizen can’t bring criminal charges.
You're wrong. It all requires too many unsettled, novel and absurd interpretations of the law regarding presidential immunity, to be used as a political weapon with the coordinated purpose of keeping Trump out of office. That's what makes it lawfare. Jack Smith is a lawfare hitman and most importantly, he has no official capacity. His unproven legal opinions that are the basis of charges, that enables any asshole to supersede presidential authority, weakens if not destroys the office of the presidency, and the democratic process.
What's telling is how you cling to the ignorance of your FSK and project it onto others, Flashdangerpants, and insist on assuming a self-appointed role as unlicensed elevator and escalator inspector. It makes you rather ... tedious.FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:54 pm
But it's telling that you cannot rely on a defence of "he didn't do it" because... it would be better really if he hadn't done that stuff rather than needing loopholes to get away with it.