Philosophy Now Forum

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:26 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:25 pm If there IS a so-called 'non-nutjob' AMONG 'you', adult human beings, EXISTING, in the days when this is being written, then will 'you' PLEASE LET 'us' KNOW here, now?

I have no idea who the nutjobs are.

That's why I carry a gun.

WHICH IS ANOTHER CLEAR SIGN of PURE INSANITY, I will add here now.

Were the one/s you KILLED so-called "nutjobs"?

I guess we will NEVER KNOW, FOR SURE, now, right?

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:38 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:26 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:25 pm If there IS a so-called 'non-nutjob' AMONG 'you', adult human beings, EXISTING, in the days when this is being written, then will 'you' PLEASE LET 'us' KNOW here, now?

I have no idea who the nutjobs are.

That's why I carry a gun.

WHICH IS ANOTHER CLEAR SIGN of PURE INSANITY, I will add here now.

Lack of knowledge is not insanity. It's just lack of knowledge.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:50 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:48 pm ALSO, genitals ARE NEEDED and NECESSARY, in Life.

Not for men they aren't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_insemination

Off you go to have yours detached.

LOL

OBVIOUSLY you did NOT READ, and COMPREHEND, the REST of what I SAID and WROTE 'there'.

Was 'this' ANOTHER time when 'you' could ONLY CONCLUDE ONE 'thing' ALONE?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:51 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:50 pm Talk ABOUT, 'U-turns', OR, 'TURNING 'things' AROUND' here.

I did promise you I'm going to use Philosophy against itself, didn't I?

Best you ban it.

LOL "skepdick" 'you' can NOT even DEFINE the word 'philosophy' FROM 'your' VERY OWN perspective, let alone KNOW 'what' 'philosophy' ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY.

Which LEAVES 'you' completely and utterly USELESS here.

USING 'philosophy' AGAINST 'itself', WHEN one can NOT even EXPRESS what 'that word' MEANS, to 'them', would be like 'TRYING TO' 'argue' that MORE guns are NEEDED by 'you', human beings.

LOL the ONLY 'one' 'you' ARE FOOLING or CONVINCING here IS "your" OWN 'self' "skepdick".

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:43 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:51 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:50 pm Talk ABOUT, 'U-turns', OR, 'TURNING 'things' AROUND' here.

I did promise you I'm going to use Philosophy against itself, didn't I?

Best you ban it.

LOL "skepdick" 'you' can NOT even DEFINE the word 'philosophy' FROM 'your' VERY OWN perspective, let alone KNOW 'what' 'philosophy' ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY.

Which LEAVES 'you' completely and utterly USELESS here.

You can't even define the word "define".

Doesn't seem to stop you from using it.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:02 pm

Harbal wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:58 pm I've also noticed that. It's almost like something a stupid fool would do, isn't it?

I noticed that too about you, actually. It's almost like you use your words to mean something else than what the dictionary says.

WILL 'you' PROVIDE ANY examples?

If yes, then GREAT.

But if no, then WHY NOT?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:02 pm You should talk to Flash Danger Dork about that - apparently society will tell you that you aren't allowed to do that.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:04 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:59 pm Also, and by the way, how COULD one BECOME 'a virgin'?

In the exact same way one could still be doing something they never started doing.

Well that does NOT make sense, well to me anyway.

Would you like to ELABORATE here?

Will you PROVIDE ANY examples of WHEN one could STILL be doing some 'thing' that they NEVER even STARTED doing?

If yes, then GREAT.

But if no, then WHY NOT?

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:49 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:04 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:59 pm Also, and by the way, how COULD one BECOME 'a virgin'?

In the exact same way one could still be doing something they never started doing.

Well that does NOT make sense, well to me anyway.

That's the whole point

Are you still wearing a swastika?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:19 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:17 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 1:49 pm
If the 2nd amendment applies to muskets only then the 1st amendment applies to ideas distributed using the Gutenberg press only.


And the rest of the idiots (like you) are too stupid to understand "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

LOL 'it' was ONLY 'an amendment', itself, WHICH, in and of itself, COULD just be AMENDED, AGAIN.

And, BECAUSE some 'thing' WAS written down, by some human being/s, then 'it' SHOULD be FOLLOWED and ADHERED TO, FOREVER MORE, is HOW STUPID some people had REALLY BECOME, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS', when 'this' WAS being written.

This 'one' here is 'TRYING TO' 'argue' some 'thing' like, IF the 2nd amendment SAID, 'the right of the people to keep and bear Arms', until the year 2023', then 'that one' would ALSO FOLLOW and ABIDE BY 'amendments', of ALL 'things'.

IF ANY human being wrote some 'thing' down, and then wrote after 'it', 'shall not be infringed', then that human being would have BEEN just AS STUPID as ANY one human being who would FOLLOW 'it' or USE 'it' for 'TRYING TO' 'argue', 'justify', and/or 'rationalize' some 'thing'.

So when are we cancelling murder laws?

DID what you ASKED and WROTE here have ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' to do WITH what I SAID and WROTE?

If yes, then 'what', EXACTLY?

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:52 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:19 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:17 pm

LOL 'it' was ONLY 'an amendment', itself, WHICH, in and of itself, COULD just be AMENDED, AGAIN.

And, BECAUSE some 'thing' WAS written down, by some human being/s, then 'it' SHOULD be FOLLOWED and ADHERED TO, FOREVER MORE, is HOW STUPID some people had REALLY BECOME, BACK in the 'OLDEN DAYS', when 'this' WAS being written.

This 'one' here is 'TRYING TO' 'argue' some 'thing' like, IF the 2nd amendment SAID, 'the right of the people to keep and bear Arms', until the year 2023', then 'that one' would ALSO FOLLOW and ABIDE BY 'amendments', of ALL 'things'.

IF ANY human being wrote some 'thing' down, and then wrote after 'it', 'shall not be infringed', then that human being would have BEEN just AS STUPID as ANY one human being who would FOLLOW 'it' or USE 'it' for 'TRYING TO' 'argue', 'justify', and/or 'rationalize' some 'thing'.

So when are we cancelling murder laws?

DID what you ASKED and WROTE here have ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' to do WITH what I SAID and WROTE?

If yes, then 'what', EXACTLY?

Amendments! We can ammend anything written.

Like murder laws.

When are we amending those to make murder legal?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:39 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:38 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:26 pm
I have no idea who the nutjobs are.

That's why I carry a gun.

WHICH IS ANOTHER CLEAR SIGN of PURE INSANITY, I will add here now.

Lack of knowledge is not insanity.

Maybe NOT. BUT, walking around the streets carrying a gun, just BECAUSE one has a so-called 'lack of knowledge' of "others", besides it could be very INTIMIDATING, and A SIGN of 'one's' INSECURITIES and/or COWARDICE, it is also ANOTHER SIGN of INSANITY.

ALWAYS WONDERING, and WORRYING, 'Is that one a nutjob?' Is that one a nutjob?' 'Is that one a nutjob?' OR, is it THAT one who is a nutjub?' WHILE arming "them" 'self' WITH a gun, JUST IN CASE, 'That one IS a nutjob?' IS NOT, and I will repeat NOT, a SIGN of STABILITY and SECURITY.

Carrying a gun to FEEL SECURE is a SURE SIGN of one who IS NOT SECURE, who LACKS A LOT OF SECURITY, or who IS just VERY INSECURE.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:39 pm It's just lack of knowledge.

NOT KNOWING how MANY stars there are in galaxies IS just 'lack of knowledge'.

Having absolutely NO idea of WHO are the so-called "nutjobs" around 'you', is NOT necessary 'lack of knowledge' but MORE SO a sign of one who NEEDS some sort of HELP and GUIDANCE. It is ALSO some 'thing' that "others" would be CONCERNED ABOUT, especially WHEN 'they' ARE carrying A GUN with 'them'.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:44 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:43 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 2:51 pm
I did promise you I'm going to use Philosophy against itself, didn't I?

Best you ban it.

LOL "skepdick" 'you' can NOT even DEFINE the word 'philosophy' FROM 'your' VERY OWN perspective, let alone KNOW 'what' 'philosophy' ACTUALLY IS, EXACTLY.

Which LEAVES 'you' completely and utterly USELESS here.

You can't even define the word "define".

YES I CAN, and VERY SIMPLY and VERY EASILY, I will add.

ALSO, I NEVER CLAIMED some 'thing' as ABSURD AS, I am going to DESTROY 'define' WITH 'define', EITHER

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:44 pm Doesn't seem to stop you from using it.

'you' seem to have, AGAIN, VERY QUICKLY MADE AN ASSUMPTION, WHILE just AS QUICKLY JUMPING TO A(NOTHER) CONCLUSION.

Now, was 'this' ANOTHER example when 'you' could ONLY CONCLUDE 'this' here, what 'you' HAVE?

ALSO, what we have here is ANOTHER example of "skpedick" completely and utterly TWISTING AROUND and DISTORTING the ACTUAL words, which the "other" USED, and 'TRIED TO' 'argue' FROM that Truly TWISTED and DISTORTED position, of 'its' OWN MAKING.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:51 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:49 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:04 pm
In the exact same way one could still be doing something they never started doing.

Well that does NOT make sense, well to me anyway.

That's the whole point

Are you still wearing a swastika?

NO, AND, I NEVER wore one BEFORE, NEITHER.

SEE, HOW EASY and SIMPLE 'it' REALLY IS, to JUST ANSWER the CLARIFYING QUESTION, OPENLY and Honestly, WHILE at the same RELAYING ANY OTHER INFORMATION one might like TO ADD.

And, are 'you' NOW SAYING that one can NOT BECOME 'a virgin'?

Or, do 'you' STILL WANT TO STAY and STAND BEHIND the QUESTION that 'you' ASKED 'me' EARLIER?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:53 pm

Age wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:52 pm

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:19 pm
So when are we cancelling murder laws?

DID what you ASKED and WROTE here have ABSOLUTELY ANY 'thing' to do WITH what I SAID and WROTE?

If yes, then 'what', EXACTLY?

Amendments! We can ammend anything written.

OF COURSE, that IS, EXACTLY, what happened WITH that so-called '2nd amendment'.

'It' just AMENDED some 'thing' written PRIOR, and which would be MUCH BETTER AMENDED 'itself', by some people.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:53 pm Like murder laws.

IF 'you' SO WISH.

'They' could be AMENDED in ANY way POSSIBLE, that is; IF 'you', human beings, WANTED TO.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 3:53 pm When are we amending those to make murder legal?

WHY would 'you' WANT 'those laws' to go 'THAT WAY', especially considering 'your' OTHER views?

Oh, MAYBE BECAUSE 'you' VIEW the 'murdering of human beings' as just A 'sport', and would LIKE 'murder' to be LEGAL so then 'you' could PRACTICE 'your sport' much MORE EASILY and SIMPLY.

Or, MAYBE 'you' just do NOT KNOW how to 'argue', properly AND correctly, and so JUST TWIST and DISTORT 'THE WORDS' OPPOSING 'yours', and so have just, ONCE AGAIN, done 'this' while PRESENTING a GREAT example of 'black and white thinking' and of 'that FALLACY'.

By the way, WHY did 'you' just NOT ASK, 'When are we amending those to make murder STRICTER, or make the PENALTIES HARSHER?'

After all 'we' COULD make gun ownership STRICTER, and the PENALTIES for KILLING people HARSHER. BUT, 'you' would NOT LIKE 'that' would 'you', right "skepdick"?

What would 'your' ANSWER BE, to the QUESTION, 'Would you like gun ownership laws RELAXED, while making the PENALTIES for KILLING people WITH guns RELAXED AS WELL?'

After all 'you' have ALREADY KILLED some human beings, and ARE READY and WANTING TO KILL MORE AGAIN, if 'you' think or BELIEVE KILLING is necessary, so 'you' would NOT REALLY WANT the KILLING of human beings WITH guns to BECOME STRICTER nor HARSHER, right "skepdick"?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon May 15, 2023 1:05 pm
I failed?

You know it's impossible to restrict genitals from people that have a higgen idea to mass-rape children.

When are you going to hand in your genitals at the police station in order to stop child rape?

You fucking selfish cunt! What do you need genitals for? It's 2023 - we have artificial insemination. Don't you want to prevent child rape?
You can license some genitals if you'd like - but they'll be kept safe at the fertility clinic for you.

I'm sure many on the forum would agree with me that it is selfish cunts like you that are ultimately responsible for every childs rape.

I do hope you have not got any children of your own. Or plan to have them.

Because if you have, then what you have said here, makes you sound like a first class idiot. Did you have the good sense to not make children, and potentially put them in harms way in a world, you and others have created?