WE NEED MORE GUNS..

[Age]

Mate, if a prison island full of convicts could arm itself gun control seemss like a futile exercise against law-abiding citizens.

Well getting back to the topic, would you prefer to live in a country where the number of guns accessible to anyone outstrips the population count, or in a country where there are only guns available to people in cases of hunting and shooting clubs?

The number of guns has no effect on my preference.

So, If ABSOLUTELY NO one on the WHOLE planet called earth, for example, had a gun 'you', "skepdick" would STILL prefer to OWN a gun, right?

If yes, now would that be FOR 'protection', FOR 'fun', OR for some OTHER reason?

Actually - I am lying. If your country makes it super-difficult to own firearms then I'll probably never live there. I am too invested in the sport.

IN 'what' 'sport', EXACTLY?

Did you NOT READ the words, 'there are only guns AVAILABLE to people in cases of hunting AND shooting clubs?

If you DID, then how does the CLAIM, 'I am too invested in 'the sport', LOGICALLY FOLLOW'?

Is there ANY OTHER 'sport' that we should be MADE AWARE OF that does NOT involve 'shooting' OR 'hunting', in regards to guns?

Which is why I'll never live in the UK or Australia.

Do you REALLY think or BELIEVE that ANY one or the MAJORITY of the people of those two countries would be somewhat SADDENED to hear that some human being who LOVES to walk around the streets carrying a gun, or two, and who IS READY to SHOOT to KILL human beings, does NOT and would NOT live in either of those two countries?

Any country which would allow me to own a gun for sport; or hunting but not for self-defence has its priorities up its ass.

Are you implying here that 'self-defence' IS A 'sport'?

Or was this just a, what is sometimes called, 'slip of the tongue', or 'freudian slip'?

Could 'you', "skepdick", be REVEALING MORE here then 'you' would REALLY like to be?

[Age]

Well getting back to the topic, would you prefer to live in a country where the number of guns accessible to anyone outstrips the population count, or in a country where there are only guns available to people in cases of hunting and shooting clubs?

The number of guns has no effect on my preference.

Actually - I am lying. If your country has no guns then I would probably never live there. I am too invested in the sport.

That's part of my point. In my country you get to keep your sport - gun clubs - shooting ranges and also hunting. Also, you can send your kids to school, go shopping and the cinema with EXTREMELY remote chance of being shot to bits.

Maybe 'sport', involving guns, to "skepdick", is NOT what MOST so-called 'normal people' would consider?

After all "skepdick" HAS ALREADY SHOT and KILLED some people. And, which, if "american" movies are to be TRUSTED, is what some people do CALL 'sport'.

[Skepdick]

So, If ABSOLUTELY NO one on the WHOLE planet called earth, for example, had a gun 'you', "skepdick" would STILL prefer to OWN a gun, right?

What a stupid question.

There was a time on Earth when absolutely nobody had a gun. And then somebody invented one.

Necessity is the mother of invention, so I can only conclude that guns have always been necessary.

[Age]

No clearly you do (and selfish to the extreme) by allowing to the same extent any nutjob access to easy ways of mass murdering innocents (children and all-n-sundry)

The prevent nutjobs from acquiring guns and let everyone else have them.

Or are you saying the reason you banned guns for everyone is because you are all nutjobs?

On just about EVERY occasion 'you' are COUNTERED with LOGICALLY, SOUNDLY, and/or VALIDLY 'you' TWIST or DISTORT 'those words' AROUND. As 'you' have done here, ONCE AGAIN.

Either 'that' or 'you' WILL RUN AWAY and HIDE.

[Harbal]

After all "skepdick" HAS ALREADY SHOT and KILLED some people.

I'm sure he has, on his PlayStation.

[Skepdick]

After all "skepdick" HAS ALREADY SHOT and KILLED some people.

I'm sure he has, on his PlayStation.

You forgot that time/effort-saving rule you suggested.

[Age]

How do you determine who is a nutjob - indeed, any human that secretly has decided to kill a school full of children?

Your inability to tell the difference sounds like a you-problem.

Most people aren't nutjobs. Why should most people be banned from owning guns?

BECAUSE MOST, like 'you', WANT TO USE 'them' TO so-call 'protect "themselves" or "their" so-called 'property', BY KILLING and MAIMING "OTHER" human beings.

THAT IS WHY.

How MUCH SIMPLER and EASIER could 'this' get here?

If you let the minority of nutjobs dictate how the majority of non-nutjobs should live their lives you've broken democracy.

If there IS a so-called 'non-nutjob' AMONG 'you', adult human beings, EXISTING, in the days when this is being written, then will 'you' PLEASE LET 'us' KNOW here, now?

[Skepdick]

If there IS a so-called 'non-nutjob' AMONG 'you', adult human beings, EXISTING, in the days when this is being written, then will 'you' PLEASE LET 'us' KNOW here, now?

I have no idea who the nutjobs are.

That's why I carry a gun.

[Age]

How do you determine who is a nutjob - indeed, any human that secretly has decided to kill a school full of children?

Your inability to tell the difference sounds like a you-problem.

Most people aren't nutjobs. Why should most people be banned from owning guns?

YOU FAILED. You know it is impossible restrict guns from people that have a hidden idea to mass murder children.

I'm sure many on the forum would agree with me that it is selfish kunts like you that are ultimately responsible for every childs death at these killings.

Well it IS EXTREMELY OBVIOUS, and an IRREFUTABLE Fact, that the 'ones' who WANT guns, ARE 'the ones' KEEPING, IN societies, 'those guns' that ENDED UP being USED to KILL EACH and EVERY one of THOSE CHILDREN, AND which WILL END UP BEING 'those guns' that END UP KILLING MORE and MORE CHILDREN.

I think 'SELFISH' could be THE PERFECT word here.

[Harbal]

That's why I carry a gun.

pink_pistol_960x.jpg

Just speculating.

[Skepdick]

That's why I carry a gun.

pink_pistol_960x.jpg


Just speculating.

[Age]

YOU FAILED. You know it is impossible restrict guns from people that have a hidden idea to mass murder children.

I'm sure many on the forum would agree with me that it is selfish kunts like you that are ultimately responsible for every childs death at these killings.

I failed?

You know it's impossible to restrict genitals from people that have a higgen idea to mass-rape children.

'you', human beings, ARE born WITH genitals. BUT, 'you' are CERTAINLY NOT born WITH guns, OBVIOUSLY.

When are you going to hand in your genitals at the police station in order to stop child rape?

BUT, and just AS OBVIOUS, 'you', adult human beings, do NOT use the genitals that ARE ATTACHED to "other" human beings, and which 'they' WERE born WITH, to rape children.

ALSO, genitals ARE NEEDED and NECESSARY, in Life. Whereas, guns are CERTAINLY NOT, NEVER WERE, and NEVER WILL BE.

You fucking selfish cunt!

HOW, EXACTLY, would the one here known as "attofishpi" 'handing in 'its' OWN genitals at the police station' going to STOP 'child rape', EXACTLY?

'you' REALLY DO have a VERY STRONG TENDENCY to TWIST and DISTORT the words of "others" AROUND in such a completely UTTERLY STUPID and FOOLISH WAY when 'you' views or ideas are SHOWN and/or PROVED to UNSOUND, INVALID, or just PLAIN OLD False, Wrong, or Incorrect here.

What do you need genitals for? It's 2023 - we have artificial insemination.

WHERE, EXACTLY, does human sperm and egg COME FROM IF there are NOT human genitalia?

Don't you want to prevent child rape?

REMOVING the egg and sperm producing genitals FROM ALL children when 'they' are born will NOT prevent NOR even STOP 'child rape'. That is; at least UP TO ALL the children have grown into adult hood and when NO MORE children are born, BECAUSE there are NO MORE human beings producing eggs NOR sperm ANYMORE. This is IF we FOLLOWED 'your' so-called "logic" here "skepdick".

You can license some genitals if you'd like - but they'll be kept safe at the fertility clinic for you.

Testicles do NOT produce sperm, on their OWN. 'They' work MUCH BETTER when CONNECT WITH a breathing and blood pumping human body.

I'm sure many on the forum would agree with me that it is selfish cunts like you that are ultimately responsible for every childs rape.

Are 'you' REALLY 'sure' of 'this' here "skepdick"?

If yes, then how about 'we' conduct A POLL. 'Does ANY one reading 'this', and who is ABLE TO 'respond', AGREE WITH "skepdick" here that it is so-called 'selfish cunts', like "attofisphi", who do NOT 'hand in their genitals at the police station', who are ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE for EVERY 'child's rape'?

'I' WILL BE the FIRST ONE here to SAY, 'I do NOT AGREE WITH "skepdick" here.

Now, it WILL BE VERY INTERESTING TO SEE WHO ACTUALLY AGREES WITH 'you', "skepdick". And, IF 'it' IS the MAJORITY, or NOT.

[Age]

YOU FAILED. You know it is impossible restrict guns from people that have a hidden idea to mass murder children.

I'm sure many on the forum would agree with me that it is selfish kunts like you that are ultimately responsible for every childs death at these killings.

As you know, I speak for a good many of the members here, and I can confirm that we do agree with you.

So you also agree with genital control towards prevenging child rape? Or are you going for a U-turn here?

Talk ABOUT, 'U-turns', OR, 'TURNING 'things' AROUND' here.

[Skepdick]

ALSO, genitals ARE NEEDED and NECESSARY, in Life.

Not for men they aren't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_insemination

Off you go to have yours detached.

[Skepdick]

Talk ABOUT, 'U-turns', OR, 'TURNING 'things' AROUND' here.

I did promise you I'm going to use Philosophy against itself, didn't I?

Best you ban it.