Passion

[Age]

I’m equally happy to drop dead any moment,

Will you shut up about dropping dead, you are really starting to worry me now.

Well we’ll have to wait and see Harbal… you might go before me, who knows, we have no control.


If I did have control, I’d definitely wait for you before slipping away into the unknowable mystery of non existence. Just imagine, we’ll both be in a place where we never ever knew each other existed…

There is no place anywhere, other than this Existence. Neither of 'you' go anywhere. 'you' are just not aware anymore, after the life of those human bodies stops.

[Age]

Err, no, the universe needs human beings like an ocean needs water. So no, there is no need for human beings.

Just as the universe had no need for dinosaurs to exist only to later on extinct.

The universe hasn't got a brain. Nor a mind.

Do you not what to find out why I said what I said and what I was referring to, exactly?

In the time when this was being written, nobody cared.

So far, obviously.

And that is why you were still confused, and looking for the truth or answers, back in those olden times.

[Harbal]

Why guess what they may find when you do not even know what they say?

Because you asked me a question to which I didn't know the answer, but I didn't like to offer you nothing at all, so I offered you a guess. I'm sorry. In future when I don't know the answer to a question I will just say I don't know.

These Truly Honest answers have been and are what I am seeking out and looking for. So, that would be very much appreciated.

Also, if you do not know what they say, then why jump past irritating and guess they would find them maddening and frustrating?

Again, for the same reason as above.

But why maddening and frustrating, instead of just irritating? And, why not other feeling words.

But if someone was not fake in any way whatsoever at all, then this would imply that you could be absolutely sure about them.

Not necessarily, it might imply that they are a very convincing fake.

But if any one could be a very convincing fake, then this could imply that there is absolutely no one who any one could be sure of.

Also, why would any of you want to be fake in the first place?

And furthermore, if none of you are yet able to answer the question, Who am I? properly and accurately, then this means none of you know the real from the fake, in relation to who each and every one is exactly anyway.

And, vice-versa, if you can never be absolutely sure about sure about someone, then this implies that they are in fact being fake, in some way.

But implications are not proof of the presence of the things they imply.

But if you can not be sure, then you obviously do not have, nor have not yet recognised, the proof. And, if any one of you can be convincely fake, then you will never have proof, and then you could never be sure.

As can be clearly seen this just one very vicious cycle. That is anyway until you are able to answer the question, Who am I? accurately, then the proof of who is actually the real and true is seen, and thus also known. And only then can one be absolutely and Truly sure if and when there is "another" one who is just trying to fake.

I think you are treating this thread more seriously than it deserves. It is true that people who claim to have passion do tend to irritate me, but the thread was meant to make a kind off joke out of it, rather than present it as a topic of formal debate.

[Walker]

Is there anything worse than a person who is "passionate" about something?

Perhaps, a worser person.

It used to be that the Passionate People were attracted to America. It’s probably still the same, seeing as how many folks are risking life and limb to illegally flood the Southern border of the U.S. after paying the human traffickers currently encouraged by the Brandon administration, and seeing the level of cynicism pointed at the U.S. by folks who got left behind.

If the year was right, and if Shakespeare was stupid enough to piss off the king instead of impress him so much that the king became the hand of God and got the Bible written, then Shakespeare probably would have also taken the high road and caught a freighter to “Merica.

Because of lost wrasslin’ bouts with comprehension of the perfectly obvious in a world of words, a passion for words is not passion but rather, the best adaptation to the world that is, and the world that is here and now, is words. It requires a respect for words.

The best adaptation to survive, that’s right, survive, the physical debilitation of unfiltered empathy has yet to be explained in the proper way, although it could very well be universal to the symptoms of true unfiltered empathy experienced by everyone, which is not to say that everyone experiences true, unfiltered empathy. It’s only made possible by removing all delusional filters the work upon apprehension, and that removal has physical effects, and is not set right by will or choice, only intent and need. Such empathy loses distinguishing limitations, until new filters have been put in place by a need for locomotion, and a need for accurate movement in three-dimensional space.

I think with reasons that surprisingly enough might be perceived as valid reasons by everyone if not erroneously perceived by some as irrelevant, or erroneously perceived by some as not immediate, that the best adaptation in the world of words is the yoking of word music to meaning, such as the in olden days of the oral tradition that found writing to be too limited for human understanding, although there were those who insisted upon giving it a good go and things got written down just so rather than say mañana.

Passion puts the music of the words to the meaning, yes indeed it does, and through an alchemy that has been made invisible only through neglect of attention that makes it effortless and allows for the truth to simultaneously shine and shine self-protected. Passion puts the words into the blood, into the mind, and it joins with meaning to shape words into thoughts until one effortlessly plays with clusters of concepts such as passion and plays appreciation of the sounds sparked by beauty, and plays with understanding of that which grunts. Of course you know of the freedom, poor corporate man of the hive, if that be silent you or one who can only squeak out a sentence or two, so worried what the world might think.

What is the conceptual theme that is root of all this music?

I think, therefore I continue to Live.

[Walker]

I think you are treating this thread more seriously than it deserves. It is true that people who claim to have passion do tend to irritate me, but the thread was meant to make a kind off joke out of it, rather than present it as a topic of formal debate.

You can't control everything, you totalitarian.

Go to the lounge to lounge, unserious guy.

[Harbal]

You can't control everything, you totalitarian.

Go to the lounge to lounge, unserious guy.

Sounds like you've got a bee in your bonnet, Walker.

[FlashDangerpants]

Do you not what to find out why I said what I said and what I was referring to, exactly?

In the time when this was being written, nobody cared.

So far, obviously.

And that is why you were still confused, and looking for the truth or answers, back in those olden times.

In the before-before time when ADULT HUMANS had not begun to fathom the tremendous good fortune that brought KEN among them, the prophet's wisdom was spewed into an uncaring void, like a dog taking a shit down an up escalator or some other poetic image like that!

But that's ok becuase, it was completely THE PLAN, THE OBJECTIVE, AND THE INTENDED GOAL.

[Age]

Because you asked me a question to which I didn't know the answer, but I didn't like to offer you nothing at all, so I offered you a guess. I'm sorry. In future when I don't know the answer to a question I will just say I don't know.

These Truly Honest answers have been and are what I am seeking out and looking for. So, that would be very much appreciated.

Again, for the same reason as above.

But why maddening and frustrating, instead of just irritating? And, why not other feeling words.

Not necessarily, it might imply that they are a very convincing fake.

But if any one could be a very convincing fake, then this could imply that there is absolutely no one who any one could be sure of.

Also, why would any of you want to be fake in the first place?

And furthermore, if none of you are yet able to answer the question, Who am I? properly and accurately, then this means none of you know the real from the fake, in relation to who each and every one is exactly anyway.

But implications are not proof of the presence of the things they imply.

But if you can not be sure, then you obviously do not have, nor have not yet recognised, the proof. And, if any one of you can be convincely fake, then you will never have proof, and then you could never be sure.

As can be clearly seen this just one very vicious cycle. That is anyway until you are able to answer the question, Who am I? accurately, then the proof of who is actually the real and true is seen, and thus also known. And only then can one be absolutely and Truly sure if and when there is "another" one who is just trying to fake.

I think you are treating this thread more seriously than it deserves. It is true that people who claim to have passion do tend to irritate me, but the thread was meant to make a kind off joke out of it, rather than present it as a topic of formal debate.

I found you used to be far more funnier when you used to use those very 'dry' one liners, instead.

[Age]

In the time when this was being written, nobody cared.

So far, obviously.

And that is why you were still confused, and looking for the truth or answers, back in those olden times.

In the before-before time when ADULT HUMANS had not begun to fathom the tremendous good fortune that brought KEN among them, the prophet's wisdom was spewed into an uncaring void, like a dog taking a shit down an up escalator or some other poetic image like that!

But that's ok becuase, it was completely THE PLAN, THE OBJECTIVE, AND THE INTENDED GOAL.

Why do you refer to me as ken?

[FlashDangerpants]

So far, obviously.

And that is why you were still confused, and looking for the truth or answers, back in those olden times.

In the before-before time when ADULT HUMANS had not begun to fathom the tremendous good fortune that brought KEN among them, the prophet's wisdom was spewed into an uncaring void, like a dog taking a shit down an up escalator or some other poetic image like that!

But that's ok becuase, it was completely THE PLAN, THE OBJECTIVE, AND THE INTENDED GOAL.

Why do you refer to me as ken?

In the days before the time before the week after the thing in that place, Ken was the before before, and the forebear of Age.

[Harbal]

I found you used to be far more funnier when you used to use those very 'dry' one liners, instead.

Maybe it's because I'm getting old. But you can't please everybody, no matter what you do. I remember, back in my "one liner" days, being accused on a few occassions of being capable of nothing else. It was said that I could only manage to produce two full sentences at most.

[Age]

In the before-before time when ADULT HUMANS had not begun to fathom the tremendous good fortune that brought KEN among them, the prophet's wisdom was spewed into an uncaring void, like a dog taking a shit down an up escalator or some other poetic image like that!

But that's ok becuase, it was completely THE PLAN, THE OBJECTIVE, AND THE INTENDED GOAL.

Why do you refer to me as ken?

In the days before the time before the week after the thing in that place, Ken was the before before, and the forebear of Age.

But so what?

Why do you not refer to the one that I used before "ken"?

And, why do you not refer to any of the many other names that "others" have used here?

[Age]

I found you used to be far more funnier when you used to use those very 'dry' one liners, instead.

Maybe it's because I'm getting old. But you can't please everybody, no matter what you do. I remember, back in my "one liner" days, being accused on a few occassions of being capable of nothing else. It was said that I could only manage to produce two full sentences at most.

When just one sentence was as funny as some of yours were, then I found just one sentence of yours was more than enough.

So, to me, there was no need to produce two sentences, let alone two full sentences, (whatever that really means).

[FlashDangerpants]

Why do you refer to me as ken?

In the days before the time before the week after the thing in that place, Ken was the before before, and the forebear of Age.

But so what?

Why do you not refer to the one that I used before "ken"?

And, why do you not refer to any of the many other names that "others" have used here?

It is said that FDP, in the before times, didn't give a fuck about how many accounts Ken used.

[Iwannaplato]

It's interesting: the topic of passion now seems focused on how Harbal could be a better poster
and
the reincarnation of Ken.

Both of these topics are centered on Age.

Is Age the source of passion on PN?