Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:I've got a suggestion for you, instead of asking your lame questions, maybe you can learn something at the Pilosophy of Religion "Club Ouzo No. 9 & Sally Sue" thread.

And there you have it folks!

Not a man of his word nor one worthy of any respect.
p.s.
Poetry not for me bobby, prefer philosophy.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:I've got a suggestion for you, instead of asking your lame questions, maybe you can learn something at the Pilosophy of Religion "Club Ouzo No. 9 & Sally Sue" thread.

Poetry not for me bobby, prefer philosophy.

You wouldn't know philosophy if it bit you in the butt!

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:I've got a suggestion for you, instead of asking your lame questions, maybe you can learn something at the Pilosophy of Religion "Club Ouzo No. 9 & Sally Sue" thread.

Poetry not for me bobby, prefer philosophy.

You wouldn't know philosophy if it bit you in the butt!

Well I can spell it and I have a bit of paper that says differently.

Whereas you think politics is philosophy and pretty piss-poor politics they are bobby.

Anyhoo, they you have it folks! Another shining example of how the internut loon is incapable of answering a question about their thoughts even tho' they state that they will. Not only is this an example of how one can spot such a beast but also shows them entitled to no respect upon a philosophy forum as they cannot keep their word.
p.s.
Not philosophy of religion section bobby but the poetry section of Aesthetics.

Arising_uk wrote:Anyhoo, they you have it folks!

Yeah, I guess compared to linguistics, philosophy is your area of expertise.

bobevenson wrote:Yeah, I guess compared to linguistics, philosophy is your area of expertise.

Nice to be acknowledged bob but as usual you are wrong as in Philosophy we learn Logic and as such I understand two parts of Linguistics pretty well.

Anyhoo bob,
Care to prove you are a man of your word and will stick by your statement that you will answer any question put towards your thoughts or can we keep showing you the lack of respect you earn.

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So tell us bob are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?
p.s.
By-the-by bobby,
See those two commas in the second quote, grammatically incorrect.

Arising_uk wrote: p.s.
By-the-by bobby,
See those two commas in the second quote, grammatically incorrect.

Let's see, somebody who mangles the English language giving me a grammar lesson? For instance, the "p.s." should be capitalized, what the fuck does "By-the-by" mean, and "See" should be "see."

Lol.

I stand corrected bobby.

But there you go folks, bob is incapable of answering a question about his thoughts or words. This is a defining feature of the internut loon and allows easy identification. On top of that he makes promises that are empty and as such deserves no respect but much pity as he is clearly suffering from a mental illness. Me, I'd ban him.

Arising_uk wrote: Me, I'd ban him.

Spoken like a true European totalitarian.

bobevenson wrote:Spoken like a true European totalitarian.

See how I stood to be corrected bobby? This is why I'd ban you as this is a philosophy forum and you are incapable of such an act. For example, you criticised my linguistic ability but had made your own grammatical errors but when I pointed this out to you you just respond that I have no right to criticise but I wasn't, I was pointing out the irony of your words in response to your vacuous attack, a tactic you use all the time to avoid having to consider what others think about your thoughts. You are also incapable of answering a question for exactly the same reason. So yup, I'd ban you in an instant as an offence to philosophical thought as you are not here to philosophise about your thoughts but because you've been banned everywhere else. You have a serious mental issue but luckily it's harmless, if you don't believe this then you really need to consider that you posted your guff upon a baby name forum!!

Arising_uk wrote:For example, you criticised my linguistic ability but had made your own grammatical errors...

I'd certainly like you to refresh my memory on any grammatical errors you think I've made. Are you sure you're not hallucinating again, Lisa, or whatever your feminine name is?

You have the memory of a goldfish bobby.

Any chance you will be keeping your word and replying to questions about your thoughts.

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So tell us bob are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you point out my grammatical "errors."

Because I don't in general do this, I leave this up to those who use it as a way deflecting questions about their thoughts, such as now. When I do it it's to point out the irony that the avoider has also made a grammatical error so glasshouses and pots come to mind.

Anyhoo folks, once again the bobster confirms my observation that the internut loon is incapable of answering a direct question and is an accurate sign that one is conversing with one, that'll be you bobby, and as such deserves the respect that they earn. Add to that that in your case bobby you are also a proven liar as you stated that you answer all questions put to you and so far have not answered mine.

So once more to prove my point.

bobevenson wrote:Theist, agnostic, atheist. As Bob the Baptist, I can tell you that the first and third are fools, and absolute fools at that.

bobevenson wrote:Anybody who isn't an agnostic is a fool.

So tell us bob, are you an agnostic or an absolute fool?

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you point out my grammatical "errors."

Because I don't in general do this, I leave this up to those who use it as a way deflecting questions about their thoughts, such as now. When I do it it's to point out the irony that the avoider has also made a grammatical error so glasshouses and pots come to mind.

If anybody can figure out what she just said, please let me know.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you point out my grammatical "errors."

Because I don't in general do this, I leave this up to those who use it as a way deflecting questions about their thoughts, such as now. When I do it it's to point out the irony that the avoider has also made a grammatical error so glasshouses and pots come to mind.

If anybody can figure out what she just said, please let me know.

If you don't understand what irony is, Bob, I suggest you grab a decent dictionary and look it up.