But you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant![]()
"age" verses "quirk"
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
So, 'you' got out of your way to help and advise another, which you also claim you, 'always', found annoying.accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:37 amI don't recall interacting with it. Certainly not in a sense of 'helping it out' anyway. I've always found it annoying.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:27 amAge is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always intant![]()
How long has "accelafine" been in this forum, and how long is 'always', to you?
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
And, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 amI think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.
If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:
Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 amI think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
Said what? Where? Do you have a link?Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:57 amBut you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant![]()
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
I've come around to your way of posting, "age". I used to believe - apologies for believing - that it was wrong to create and sustain unrelated tangents in threads - but I no longer believe that.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:06 amAnd, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 amI think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.
If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:
Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
Of course how could communication issues be unrelated to a thread topic, given that topics and threads have to do with communication.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
think = to cogitateFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us
But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
-
Flannel Jesus
- Posts: 4302
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
You missed the most important word, the first one, "I"Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 amthink = to cogitateFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us
But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
- accelafine
- Posts: 5042
- Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows' 
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
I could 'now' also say and write, 'Fuck off you fucking troll/bot fuckwit.' and/or Foff you fing troll/bot fwit. exactly like you did when you were just ask some clarifying questions, also.accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 amSaid what? Where? Do you have a link?Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:57 amBut you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant![]()
I could 'then' also say and write, 'To engage with "accelafine" is to invite insanity into your life. Do so at your own peril. If you value your mental health you will avoid this particular bot at all costs. "accelafine" is the most dangerous 'person' I have encountered on the internet, anywhere. Take heed. you have been warned.', as well, also. That is; if you were to reply to me, any more.
But, I shall not.
I will, instead however, just leave your clarifying questions here, unanswered and not yet clarified, also.
-
Gary Childress
- Posts: 11747
- Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
- Location: It's my fault
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
Hold on, accelafine!! I'll help you. He can't suck me in!accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:22 am OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows'![]()
Or can he?
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
Although one of your last posts 'about me' was to 'criticize me' for doing, exactly, what you are doing 'now', here?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 amI've come around to your way of posting, "age". I used to believe - apologies for believing - that it was wrong to create and sustain unrelated tangents in threads - but I no longer believe that.Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:06 amAnd, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 am I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.
In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.
If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:
Let's look at and talk about "age", again.
That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
Are you asking, or telling?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 am Of course how could communication issues be unrelated to a thread topic, given that topics and threads have to do with communication.
-
Iwannaplato
- Posts: 8534
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
You're not ready for that one. You have too many assumptions and beliefs. I would find myself brought down to the human being level even to try to explain it to someone like "flannel jesus"Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:18 amYou missed the most important word, the first one, "I"Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 amthink = to cogitateFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us
But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
That is one human being's provided 'meanings', which one could wonder how much 'those meanings' align with 'the meanings' of others, and/or even with 'the writer', itself.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 amthink = to cogitateFlannel Jesus wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us
But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
Who is, obviously, the only one' who, actually, 'knows' what the 'True intended meaning', really, was, and is.
Re: "age" verses "quirk"
If you only 'knew' how Truly and simple and easy it is, and was, to 'suck' you all in, here.accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:22 am OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows'![]()