"age" verses "quirk"

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Post Reply
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant :roll:
But you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:37 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:27 am
accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always intant :roll:
Age is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.
I don't recall interacting with it. Certainly not in a sense of 'helping it out' anyway. I've always found it annoying.
So, 'you' got out of your way to help and advise another, which you also claim you, 'always', found annoying.

How long has "accelafine" been in this forum, and how long is 'always', to you?
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.
And, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.

In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.

If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:

Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.
What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by accelafine »

Age wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:57 am
accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant :roll:
But you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?
Said what? Where? Do you have a link?
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Iwannaplato »

Age wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:06 am
Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:46 am If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.
I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.
And, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.

In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.

If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:

Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
I've come around to your way of posting, "age". I used to believe - apologies for believing - that it was wrong to create and sustain unrelated tangents in threads - but I no longer believe that.

Of course how could communication issues be unrelated to a thread topic, given that topics and threads have to do with communication.
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Iwannaplato »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
think = to cogitate
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us

But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
Flannel Jesus
Posts: 4302
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2022 7:09 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Flannel Jesus »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
think = to cogitate
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us

But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
You missed the most important word, the first one, "I"
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by accelafine »

OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows' :shock:
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 am
Age wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:57 am
accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:24 am I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant :roll:
But you said it. So, how can you 'now', reasonably, claim that you do not recall it?
Said what? Where? Do you have a link?
I could 'now' also say and write, 'Fuck off you fucking troll/bot fuckwit.' and/or Foff you fing troll/bot fwit. exactly like you did when you were just ask some clarifying questions, also.

I could 'then' also say and write, 'To engage with "accelafine" is to invite insanity into your life. Do so at your own peril. If you value your mental health you will avoid this particular bot at all costs. "accelafine" is the most dangerous 'person' I have encountered on the internet, anywhere. Take heed. you have been warned.', as well, also. That is; if you were to reply to me, any more.

But, I shall not.

I will, instead however, just leave your clarifying questions here, unanswered and not yet clarified, also.
Gary Childress
Posts: 11747
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:08 pm
Location: It's my fault

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Gary Childress »

accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:22 am OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows' :shock:
Hold on, accelafine!! I'll help you. He can't suck me in!

Or can he? :oops:
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 am
Age wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:06 am
Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 9:56 am I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.
And, 'this one' here is one of the many who like to accuse, and try to discredit, 'others' for 'hijacking threads'.

In case some are not yet aware what this thread is about, exactly, then what this thread is about is written in the 'topic title' of 'this thread'.

If absolutely any one wants to 'look at' and 'talk about' "age", again, then 'I' started a thread for that very purpose, which the 'topic title' of is:

Let's look at and talk about "age", again.

That is; for those who Truly do want to 'stay on topic'.
I've come around to your way of posting, "age". I used to believe - apologies for believing - that it was wrong to create and sustain unrelated tangents in threads - but I no longer believe that.
Although one of your last posts 'about me' was to 'criticize me' for doing, exactly, what you are doing 'now', here?
Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:12 am Of course how could communication issues be unrelated to a thread topic, given that topics and threads have to do with communication.
Are you asking, or telling?
Iwannaplato
Posts: 8534
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:55 pm

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Iwannaplato »

Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:18 am
Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
think = to cogitate
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us

But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
You missed the most important word, the first one, "I"
You're not ready for that one. You have too many assumptions and beliefs. I would find myself brought down to the human being level even to try to explain it to someone like "flannel jesus"
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

Iwannaplato wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:17 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:11 am What do any of the words mean in the previous sentence, in the days when this was written?
think = to cogitate
they = the ones who said that
might = not necessarily, but maybe
have = here it doesn't mean possession. It's part of the perfect tense, meaning at some point they decided, that point not determined.
decided = chose
learn = (oh boy) allow X to affect them in a generally positive way
experience = the stuff that happens that we notice or at least affect us

But please don't assume you understand my definitions or this sentence.
That is one human being's provided 'meanings', which one could wonder how much 'those meanings' align with 'the meanings' of others, and/or even with 'the writer', itself.

Who is, obviously, the only one' who, actually, 'knows' what the 'True intended meaning', really, was, and is.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: "age" verses "quirk"

Post by Age »

accelafine wrote: Thu Jun 27, 2024 10:22 am OMG. Now it's sucking us in. It's the psychic vampire Colin character in 'What we do in the shadows' :shock:
If you only 'knew' how Truly and simple and easy it is, and was, to 'suck' you all in, here.
Post Reply