"age" verses "quirk"

[Age]

By 'I', doesn't Age mean the universal superduper eternal omnipresent ne plus ultra mega one and only true One Mind? So why did such a thing (back when this was written) take issue with some silly little human? Insecurity maybe?

That 'you' adult human beings would and do contradict "yourselves", and be 'hypocrites' in regards to, which then led to the abuse of others, and especially to children, is what 'I' certainly do take 'issue' with. And, especially when you adult human beings are contradicting the very 'natural rights' that were 'given to you', like "henry quirk" is doing here.

The abuse of children is NOT some 'silly little issue', at all. Even though you may think so "atla".

What I really do not care one iota about, at all, is the actual very tiny, insignificant and extremely little 'issues' that a lot of you adult human beings, like 'you' "atla", continually go on with and about.

Can't the superduper 'I' read? Where did atla use the expression 'silly little issue'?

When did absolutely any thing say or claim that you did?

There is allegedly only one 'I', and it's everywhere, so it should be able to do more than just take issue. Do something about henry. Take away henry's freedoms or something.

What a Truly absurd thing to even 'think', let alone 'say' out aloud, in public. Especially considering what I have been saying here, all along.

[henry quirk]

not under any obligation to do nor think absolutely any thing, from absolutely any other thing.

So you define free as: to be without obligation.

Thank you.

*

so will you 'now' refrain from using words, terms, and/or phrases like: 'I ought to mind my own business and keep my hands to myself, and vice versa.'

As I say...

I think mind your own business and keep your hands to yourself is the commonsensical follow up to you have an absolute moral claim, a natural right, to your, and no one else's, life, liberty, and property. But it's mebbe an unnecessary follow up as it goes without saying.

*

if someone walked onto what you call and claim 'your property' and/or 'touches' what you call and claim 'your toothpick', then you will 'mind your own business', and, what you call, 'keep your hands to your self', right?

By property, you mean my yard, yes? If so, I don't have any toothpicks outside in my yard. My toothpicks are in my kitchen. As far as someone walking into my yard: if it's family or friend, I'll greet him. If it's a stranger I'll ask him to state his business.

[Atla]

Can't the superduper 'I' read? Where did atla use the expression 'silly little issue'?

When did absolutely any thing say or claim that you did?

If atla said no such thing then why did the 'I' reply to it?

[Age]

not under any obligation to do nor think absolutely any thing, from absolutely any other thing.

So you define free as: to be without obligation.

Thank you.

*

so will you 'now' refrain from using words, terms, and/or phrases like: 'I ought to mind my own business and keep my hands to myself, and vice versa.'

As I say...

I think mind your own business and keep your hands to yourself is the commonsensical follow up to you have an absolute moral claim, a natural right, to your, and no one else's, life, liberty, and property. But it's mebbe an unnecessary follow up as it goes without saying.

*

if someone walked onto what you call and claim 'your property' and/or 'touches' what you call and claim 'your toothpick', then you will 'mind your own business', and, what you call, 'keep your hands to your self', right?

By property, you mean my yard, yes?

If you want to change the words 'your property' to 'your yard', then by all means to that.

If so, I don't have any toothpicks outside in my yard. My toothpicks are in my kitchen. As far as someone walking into my yard: if it's family or friend, I'll greet him. If it's a stranger I'll ask him to state his business.

And, if that human being does not state their business and keeps walking, then what happens?

[Age]

Can't the superduper 'I' read? Where did atla use the expression 'silly little issue'?

When did absolutely any thing say or claim that you did?

If atla said no such thing then why did the 'I' reply to it?

But only you replied to it. I certainly never replied to it.

[Age]

"henry quirk" claims that I have been making these so-called 'ugly lil claims' about it for quite a while now. But, will "henry quirk" get around to actually posting the quotes?

Look, "henry quirk" you have stated and claimed that you will shoot human beings who come into what call and claim is 'your home' and/or tries to take what you call is 'your toothpick' and even lesser things.

Now, that you would do this proves that you have no regard at all for another human being's life, liberty, nor property, at all. Which obviously contradicts your claim that every one has a moral claim and a natural right to their own life, liberty, and property.

[Flannel Jesus]

To engage with 'age' is to invite insanity into your life. Do so at your own peril. If you value your mental health you will avoid this particular bot at all costs. 'He' is the most dangerous 'person' I have encountered on the internet, anywhere. Take heed. You have been warned.

To engage with age brings insanity to the page. If you have a life, I recommend you avoid that strife. Don't talk to him, don't say one word. It's dangerous business talking to that bird.

Talk to age and you'll get bitten, in the days when this was written.

So, here 'we' have another one who thinks that it is perfectly fine, and even 'normal', to continually 'talk about' another, but to 'not engage with' them. Which was a relatively common habit among the adult population of the human species, when this was being written.

When I engage with you, you post stupid shit like quoting me, telling me what I said was hilarious, and then saying that by calling it hilarious, you were agreeing with me.

You're a braindead fool, nobody should be subjected to engagement with you.

[accelafine]

It has to be a bot. It's simply not possible for a human to be THAT annoying.

[Age]

It has to be a bot. It's simply not possible for a human to be THAT annoying.

So, in the beginning here, you were trying to help 'me' and advise 'me' here.

But, 'now' 'I' have to be 'a bot', instead, and 'I' am SO 'annoying' to you.

How quickly views and perceptions can change here.

[accelafine]

I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always instant

[Flannel Jesus]

I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always intant

Age is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.

[accelafine]

I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always intant

Age is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.

I don't recall interacting with it. Certainly not in a sense of 'helping it out' anyway. I've always found it annoying.

[Flannel Jesus]

I don't recall that, but it's not unusual to learn about someone over time. It's not always intant

Age is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.

I don't recall interacting with it. Certainly not in a sense of 'helping it out' anyway. I've always found it annoying.

If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.

[Gary Childress]

Age is an alien, he can't understand the concept that a person could change how they interact with someone after previous interactions went sour.

I don't recall interacting with it. Certainly not in a sense of 'helping it out' anyway. I've always found it annoying.

If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.

Sometimes you are a little bit so. But who am I to judge anyone else for being annoying.

[Iwannaplato]

If only they would ask me if I'm annoying, instead of assuming, back in the days when this was written.

I think they might have decided to learn from experience. If you think you know what any of the words mean in the previous sentence, or this one, you should ask me first before responding to what you think I meant. If you think this leads to an infinite regress, you haven't met me yet. Nothing precludes an infinite regress: no topic.