Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.

Really?

Bet you can't write a cogent reply without misusing capital letters?

Age are you an only child? And if not, was/is there a lot of arguing in the household?

My inquiry is for the purposes of science. I pass no judgement here and only wish to collect relevant data.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am WHY are 'you', posters, here completely and utterly INCAPABLE of CHALLENGING 'me' on what I SAY, WRITE and CLAIM here?

Also, WHY are 'you', posters, completely and utterly UNABLE to just even ATTEMPT to back up and support what you SAY, WRITE, and CLAIM here...

...But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.

You need to be the one who you are directing your questions to because you are the only one can answer them [actually, you already know the answers...you just need to clear out all the thinking to be able to find them].

promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm Age are you an only child? And if not, was/is there a lot of arguing in the household?

My inquiry is for the purposes of science. I pass no judgement here and only wish to collect relevant data.

Gentlemen, there is a scientist among us!

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:56 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 12:21 am

You are SUCH a WEAK and INCAPABLE human being you can NOT even EXPLAIN what you TALK ABOUT and REFER to, EXACTLY.

And, you REALLY are SO SCARED and AFRAID you WILL continue on with YOUR DIVERSIONARY and DECEPTIVE TACTICS. As you WILL PROVE me True ONCE AGAIN.

I know that reading a few lines is a monumental task and no one should ever ask of you such a great sacrifice, but maybe if you bring your absolute A game, you just might succeed? (obviously not)

ALL you REALLY SAY is; "You can NOT do what you say and claim you can do".

Which is what ONLY the WEAK and SCARED would say.

PROVE me Wrong instead of just SAYING, "I am wrong".

I READ what you WROTE. And, I have ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN WHEN and WHERE you ARE Wrong.

Which is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you have EVER been ABLE to do with 'me'.

So, you can keep TRYING.

Oh, and by the way, what was 'it' AGAIN you want to KEEP CLAIMING I can NOT READ?

Your ABILITY, or LACK there of, in EXPLAINING 'things' here will SHOW and PROVE MORE about 'you' than about 'me'.

SEE, ONLY the VERY WEAK would ACCUSE "another" of "NOT being able to read", but NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL supporting evidence NOR proof.

I will NOW SHOW what ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE here. This is what 'supporting evidence AND proof' ACTUALLY looks like.

You wrote:
Why do you keep commenting here, [to another] when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?

I wrote:
This appears to be an EXTREMELY FUNNY thing to say. Especially considering the Fact that you have just commented here, when, SUPPOSEDLY, the value of absolutely ANY contribution at all (including YOUR OWN) will be ZERO as well. So, WHY did you comment here?

Besides the Fact that you have completely and utterly FAILED, ONCE AGAIN, to just answer the VERY OPEN and SIMPLE CLARIFYING question here, all you could manage to say and write was;

"Learn to read".

Now, since my reply ADDRESSED absolutely EVERY thing you said and wrote absolutely ACCURATELY, your response of, "Learn to read", is even MORE HILARIOUS for us to OBSERVE and SEE. And, since I POINTED OUT and SHOWED just how ABSURD, RIDICULOUS, and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY was all you have 'tried to' do here is TRY and DEFLECT with the ABSURD words, "Learn to read" and "Try harder".

LOOK, we have ALL SEEN, very CLEARLY, I will add, just HOW ABSURD and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY WAS. You can NOT ESCAPE this Fact NOW, no matter how MUCH or how MANY TIMES you 'try to' DEFLECT. The ONLY 'one' you are DECEIVING here is "your" 'self'.

Skipped most of this wall of text. So you admit that you can't even read back a few lines.

RCSaunders wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:53 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.

Really?

YES.

RCSaunders wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:53 pm Bet you can't write a cogent reply without misusing capital letters?

What IS the 'correct, proper, AND IRREFUTABLE' USAGE for 'capital letters', TO YOU?

Are you also saying or implying that EVERY reply I write USING 'capital letters' IS 'cogent'?

If no, then what are you saying here EXACTLY?

Also, WHY did you put a question mark at the end of a STATEMENT and CLAIM?

Is doing that a 'cogent' reply, itself?

Oh, and by the way, does saying and CLAIMING: Nothing is true or right because it is socially accepted or most people believe it. somewhat CONTRADICT what you say here about MISUSING 'capit
al letters'?

What is True or Right about USING or MISUSING 'capital letters'? And, what are you BASING the, SUPPOSED, "Right" USAGE or MISUSAGE of 'capital letters' on EXACTLY? See, if, as you propose and CLAIM, that 'they' [ANY thing] can NOT be based on "socially accepted" NOR on "what most people believe", then HOW EXACTLY could I be "MISUSING ANY 'thing', including capital letters"?

promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm Age are you an only child?

No.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm And if not, was/is there a lot of arguing in the household?

A 'lot' in relation to 'what', EXACTLY?

Also, what is the word 'arguing' here in relation to EXACTLY? Remember the word 'argue' has at least two meanings and definitions, which OPPOSE each other.

Furthermore, if I was to PRESUME what you are referring to here, then that will NOT provide you with the True, Right, AND Correct 'conclusion'.

See, it was because of the upbringing hitherto that i have had that I STOPPED 'arguing', in one sense, but am wanting to learn how to 'argue' ALWAYS, in the other sense.

Do you get what I MEAN here?

promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm My inquiry is for the purposes of science. I pass no judgement here and only wish to collect relevant data.

Okay. But are you ALSO able to be FULLY OPEN to 'inquiry' ALSO? Your REFUSAL to answer my CLARIFYING and inquisitive questions could SHOW and PROVE otherwise.

Now, if your inquiry is REALLY for the purpose of 'science', then you will have NO trouble AT ALL in answering my CLARIFYING questions, correct.

After all it is ONLY when you CLARIFY what you are ACTUALLY asking that I could then give you the True, Right, AND Correct answer/s and response/s, right?

simplicity wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 6:48 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am WHY are 'you', posters, here completely and utterly INCAPABLE of CHALLENGING 'me' on what I SAY, WRITE and CLAIM here?

Also, WHY are 'you', posters, completely and utterly UNABLE to just even ATTEMPT to back up and support what you SAY, WRITE, and CLAIM here...

...But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.

You need to be the one who you are directing your questions to because you are the only one can answer them [actually, you already know the answers...you just need to clear out all the thinking to be able to find them].

WHAT?

If 'you', ANOTHER poster, SAYS and CLAIMS some 'thing', and I ask 'you' a CLARIFYING question, then HOW EXACTLY is it ONLY 'me' who can answer those questions?

Are 'you', posters, REALLY that INCAPABLE of CLARIFYING your OWN CLAIMS, that some of 'you', like 'you', "simplicity", REALLY BELIEVE that ONLY I can CLARIFY, for 'you'? (Although there is ACTUAL Truth in this, I would be surprised that 'you' are consciously AWARE of 'this' YET).

What can be SEEN here is ANOTHER CLAIM is BEING MADE, but when asked for THAT CLAIM to be CLARIFIED and/or backed up and supported with ACTUAL PROVE, what WILL or WILL NOT be PROVIDED will ALSO become VERY CLEAR.

'you', "simplicity", have made some CLAIMS here, correct?

If yes, then WHY, EXACTLY, do I, SUPPOSEDLY, 'need' to DIRECT questions regarding YOUR CLAIMS, to ME?

Are you REALLY SAYING and MEANING that it is ACTUALLY completely and utterly IMPOSSIBLE for 'you' to answer CLARIFYING questions regarding your OWN CLAIMS?

And, YES I ALREADY DO KNOW MOST of the answers. But, SOME of 'those answers', without 'YOUR', posters, FULL Honesty I REALLY do NOT YET KNOW.

By the way the reason WHY I do ALREADY 'know' most of the answers is because I have, literally, 'sorted through' or 'cleared out' the 'thinking', FROM the 'knowing'.

As 'you' ALREADY 'alluded' to, (and SHOWN you already know), in your parenthesis.

Also, and just for fun, have you yet noticed or recognized that what is in parenthesis can be a 'teaching', of what is 'known', like in a parent teaching a child what the parent 'knows', or what they 'think they know' anyway. You know, literally, a 'parent thesis' on what is true, right, and correct?

Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 7:56 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:56 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 16, 2022 6:59 pm
I know that reading a few lines is a monumental task and no one should ever ask of you such a great sacrifice, but maybe if you bring your absolute A game, you just might succeed? (obviously not)

ALL you REALLY SAY is; "You can NOT do what you say and claim you can do".

Which is what ONLY the WEAK and SCARED would say.

PROVE me Wrong instead of just SAYING, "I am wrong".

I READ what you WROTE. And, I have ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN WHEN and WHERE you ARE Wrong.

Which is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you have EVER been ABLE to do with 'me'.

So, you can keep TRYING.

Oh, and by the way, what was 'it' AGAIN you want to KEEP CLAIMING I can NOT READ?

Your ABILITY, or LACK there of, in EXPLAINING 'things' here will SHOW and PROVE MORE about 'you' than about 'me'.

SEE, ONLY the VERY WEAK would ACCUSE "another" of "NOT being able to read", but NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL supporting evidence NOR proof.

I will NOW SHOW what ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE here. This is what 'supporting evidence AND proof' ACTUALLY looks like.

You wrote:
Why do you keep commenting here, [to another] when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?

I wrote:
This appears to be an EXTREMELY FUNNY thing to say. Especially considering the Fact that you have just commented here, when, SUPPOSEDLY, the value of absolutely ANY contribution at all (including YOUR OWN) will be ZERO as well. So, WHY did you comment here?

Besides the Fact that you have completely and utterly FAILED, ONCE AGAIN, to just answer the VERY OPEN and SIMPLE CLARIFYING question here, all you could manage to say and write was;

"Learn to read".

Now, since my reply ADDRESSED absolutely EVERY thing you said and wrote absolutely ACCURATELY, your response of, "Learn to read", is even MORE HILARIOUS for us to OBSERVE and SEE. And, since I POINTED OUT and SHOWED just how ABSURD, RIDICULOUS, and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY was all you have 'tried to' do here is TRY and DEFLECT with the ABSURD words, "Learn to read" and "Try harder".

LOOK, we have ALL SEEN, very CLEARLY, I will add, just HOW ABSURD and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY WAS. You can NOT ESCAPE this Fact NOW, no matter how MUCH or how MANY TIMES you 'try to' DEFLECT. The ONLY 'one' you are DECEIVING here is "your" 'self'.

Skipped most of this wall of text. So you admit that you can't even read back a few lines.

Read all of this "wall of text". Refuse to acknowledge ABSURD CLAIMS here. BECAUSE if you HAD READ my "wall of text", then what thee ACTUAL Truth could have been CLEARLY SEEN.

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:28 pm Read all of this "wall of text". Refuse to acknowledge ABSURD CLAIMS here. BECAUSE if you HAD READ my "wall of text", then what thee ACTUAL Truth could have been CLEARLY SEEN.

I told the ACTUAL truth, as usual you're the only one who doesn't see it.

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:47 pm

Age wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:28 pm Read all of this "wall of text". Refuse to acknowledge ABSURD CLAIMS here. BECAUSE if you HAD READ my "wall of text", then what thee ACTUAL Truth could have been CLEARLY SEEN.

I told the ACTUAL truth, as usual you're the only one who doesn't see it.

Okay, if you say SO, and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO, correct?

Now, are you BRAVE enough to INFORM us of what was the, alleged, "ACTUAL truth", which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, "told", and which I, "AS USUAL", am the ONLY 'one' who does NOT see 'it'?

And, if 'you' are NOT BRAVE ENOUGH, then MAYBE ANY of 'you', alleged, "other ones" who DOES see "the ACTUAL truth" here, which was TOLD by the one known as "atla" here, then MAYBE 'you' will SAY what "this ACTUAL truth" is, EXACTLY?

By the way, what you ACTUALLY SAID and ASKED was:
Why do you keep commenting here, when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?

And, I just POINTED OUT and SHOWED how:
This appears to be an EXTREMELY FUNNY thing to say. Especially considering the Fact that you have just commented here, when, SUPPOSEDLY, the value of absolutely ANY contribution at all (including YOUR OWN) will be ZERO as well.

I then just asked you to CLARIFY WHY 'you', "atla", would do such a STUPID CONTRADICTING 'thing by asking:

So, WHY did you comment here?

What can be CLEARLY SEEN here is that 'you' STILL have FAILED COMPLETELY to answer and CLARIFY this VERY SIMPLE QUESTION.

So, ONCE MORE, what thee ACTUAL Truth IS here is that 'you', "atla", have MADE the CLAIM that there is ZERO value contributing in this thread BUT did so by 'contributing' in this thread ALSO. As I have, AGAIN, POINTED OUT and SHOWN.

And, just about ANY one can RECOGNIZE and SEE the HYPOCRISY and CONTRADICTION 'you' have VERY CLEARLY PRESENTED for us here.

So, that IS what thee ACTUAL Truth is HERE, NOW, and thus FOREVER MORE.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 3:10 am

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:47 pm I told the ACTUAL truth, as usual you're the only one who doesn't see it.

Okay, if you say SO, and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO, correct?

You asked such a thing like 50 times in the past, and you were incorrect 50 times. Bit slow on the uptake I guess.

Now, are you BRAVE enough to INFORM us of what was the, alleged, "ACTUAL truth", which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, "told", and which I, "AS USUAL", am the ONLY 'one' who does NOT see 'it'?

And, if 'you' are NOT BRAVE ENOUGH, then MAYBE ANY of 'you', alleged, "other ones" who DOES see "the ACTUAL truth" here, which was TOLD by the one known as "atla" here, then MAYBE 'you' will SAY what "this ACTUAL truth" is, EXACTLY?

(skip wall of text)

I already wrote it down like 3 times: you can't read back.

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:19 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 3:10 am

Atla wrote: ↑Fri Feb 18, 2022 11:47 pm I told the ACTUAL truth, as usual you're the only one who doesn't see it.

Okay, if you say SO, and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO, correct?

You asked such a thing like 50 times in the past, and you were incorrect 50 times.

LOL you, after ALL this time, STILL can NOT READ and COMPREHEND correctly.

A QUESTION can NOT be 'incorrect'.

A QUESTION is ASKED for CLARIFICATION.

STATEMENTS SAY some 'thing'. Whereas QUESTIONS ASK for some 'thing'. These ARE two VERY DIFFERENT 'things'.

WHATEVER the ANSWER IS, to you, then just PROVIDE IT. Now that you HAVE answered the question, we can FINALLY move along.

So, if I have asked this question 50 times, then if you HAD answered it PREVIOUSLY, and I had SEEN it, then I would NOT have HAD TO ask AGAIN.

So, NOW that you HAVE, FINALLY, answered this question, then YOUR CLAIM that you: TOLD "the ACTUAL truth", is NOT necessarily correct AT ALL, correct?

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:19 am Bit slow on the uptake I guess.

Yes you HAVE BEEN.

You MADE A CLAIM, and WE have been WAITING for YOU to back up and support YOUR CLAIM.

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:19 am

Now, are you BRAVE enough to INFORM us of what was the, alleged, "ACTUAL truth", which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, "told", and which I, "AS USUAL", am the ONLY 'one' who does NOT see 'it'?

And, if 'you' are NOT BRAVE ENOUGH, then MAYBE ANY of 'you', alleged, "other ones" who DOES see "the ACTUAL truth" here, which was TOLD by the one known as "atla" here, then MAYBE 'you' will SAY what "this ACTUAL truth" is, EXACTLY?

(skip wall of text)

I already wrote it down like 3 times: you can't read back.

LOL
LOL
LOL

And 'you' CALL 'me' the LIAR.

The VERY REASON WHY you ARE an EXTREMELY WEAK individual is BECAUSE you have absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to STAND UPON.

You NEVER wrote 'it' down like ANY time. I HAVE READ BACK and 'it' is NOT there. 'It' is ALL in YOUR IMAGINATION. And, this has ALREADY been PROVED True. And, this is VERIFIED by the Fact that there does NOT exist ANY other one of 'you', human beings, who can back up and support YOUR CLAIM EITHER.

You are SO WEAK and SO INCOMPETENT "atla" that you can NOT even just write down ONCE, let alone AGAIN, what this so-called "ACTUAL truth" is that you have SUPPOSEDLY written down previously.

All you are doing here you WEAK and USELESS human being is 'TRY TO' DEFLECT from the ACTUAL Fact that I have ALREADY PROVED just how Truly STUPID one would HAVE TO REALLY BE to write to another, in this thread:
Why do you keep commenting here, when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?

WHILE you KEEP commenting and contributing here in this thread.

Even, IF your CLAIM was even REMOTELY True, you continually commenting and contributing now just MAKES you MORE STUPID then I have ALREADY PROVED True.

If what you CLAIMED was "the ACTUAL truth", then you commenting and contributing ONCE MORE in this thread MAKES you a True and FULL HYPOCRITE, and ALSO MAKE what you SAID and CLAIM a True SELF-CONTRADICTION.

Furthermore, your INABILITY to READ, COMPREHEND, AND UNDERSTAND ALL of this is just MORE IRREFUTABLE of just how Truly STUPID 'you' REALLY ARE "atla".

So, PLEASE continue EXACTLY as 'you' ARE. As doing so is PROVING MY CLAIM about HOW the Mind and the brain ACTUALLY WORKS absolutely and IRREFUTABLY True.

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 7:45 am

Atla wrote:You asked such a thing like 50 times in the past, and you were incorrect 50 times.

LOL you, after ALL this time, STILL can NOT READ and COMPREHEND correctly.

A QUESTION can NOT be 'incorrect'.

A QUESTION is ASKED for CLARIFICATION.

(skip wall of text)

I didn't say that the question is incorrect, again it's you who fails at basic comprehension (for all your imagined 'readers' to see ).

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 8:23 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 7:45 am

Atla wrote:You asked such a thing like 50 times in the past, and you were incorrect 50 times.

LOL you, after ALL this time, STILL can NOT READ and COMPREHEND correctly.

A QUESTION can NOT be 'incorrect'.

A QUESTION is ASKED for CLARIFICATION.

(skip wall of text)

I didn't say that the question is incorrect, again it's you who fails at basic comprehension (for all your imagined 'readers' to see ).

But I NEVER said, that you said, that the question is incorrect.

What are you READING here, EXACTLY?

And, do you have ANY REAL 'thing' to SAY here?

If yes, then what is 'that' EXACTLY?

I have ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN, IRREFUTABLY by the way, just how STUPID and CONTRADICTORY your CLAIM in this thread was.

Saying to ANOTHER; Why do you keep commenting here, when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO? while CONTINUING to comment and contribute here, is a PRIME EXAMPLE of STUPIDITY AND HYPOCRISY, at the HIGHEST LEVEL.