Really?
Bet you can't write a cogent reply without misusing capital letters?
You need to be the one who you are directing your questions to because you are the only one can answer them [actually, you already know the answers...you just need to clear out all the thinking to be able to find them].Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am WHY are 'you', posters, here completely and utterly INCAPABLE of CHALLENGING 'me' on what I SAY, WRITE and CLAIM here?
Also, WHY are 'you', posters, completely and utterly UNABLE to just even ATTEMPT to back up and support what you SAY, WRITE, and CLAIM here...
...But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.
Gentlemen, there is a scientist among us!promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm Age are you an only child? And if not, was/is there a lot of arguing in the household?
My inquiry is for the purposes of science. I pass no judgement here and only wish to collect relevant data.
Skipped most of this wall of text. So you admit that you can't even read back a few lines.Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:56 amALL you REALLY SAY is; "You can NOT do what you say and claim you can do".
Which is what ONLY the WEAK and SCARED would say.
PROVE me Wrong instead of just SAYING, "I am wrong".
I READ what you WROTE. And, I have ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN WHEN and WHERE you ARE Wrong.
Which is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you have EVER been ABLE to do with 'me'.
So, you can keep TRYING.
Oh, and by the way, what was 'it' AGAIN you want to KEEP CLAIMING I can NOT READ?
Your ABILITY, or LACK there of, in EXPLAINING 'things' here will SHOW and PROVE MORE about 'you' than about 'me'.
SEE, ONLY the VERY WEAK would ACCUSE "another" of "NOT being able to read", but NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL supporting evidence NOR proof.
I will NOW SHOW what ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE here. This is what 'supporting evidence AND proof' ACTUALLY looks like.
You wrote:
Why do you keep commenting here, [to another] when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?
I wrote:
This appears to be an EXTREMELY FUNNY thing to say. Especially considering the Fact that you have just commented here, when, SUPPOSEDLY, the value of absolutely ANY contribution at all (including YOUR OWN) will be ZERO as well. So, WHY did you comment here?
Besides the Fact that you have completely and utterly FAILED, ONCE AGAIN, to just answer the VERY OPEN and SIMPLE CLARIFYING question here, all you could manage to say and write was;
"Learn to read".
Now, since my reply ADDRESSED absolutely EVERY thing you said and wrote absolutely ACCURATELY, your response of, "Learn to read", is even MORE HILARIOUS for us to OBSERVE and SEE. And, since I POINTED OUT and SHOWED just how ABSURD, RIDICULOUS, and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY was all you have 'tried to' do here is TRY and DEFLECT with the ABSURD words, "Learn to read" and "Try harder".
LOOK, we have ALL SEEN, very CLEARLY, I will add, just HOW ABSURD and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY WAS. You can NOT ESCAPE this Fact NOW, no matter how MUCH or how MANY TIMES you 'try to' DEFLECT. The ONLY 'one' you are DECEIVING here is "your" 'self'.
YES.
What IS the 'correct, proper, AND IRREFUTABLE' USAGE for 'capital letters', TO YOU?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:53 pm Bet you can't write a cogent reply without misusing capital letters?
No.
A 'lot' in relation to 'what', EXACTLY?promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm And if not, was/is there a lot of arguing in the household?
Okay. But are you ALSO able to be FULLY OPEN to 'inquiry' ALSO? Your REFUSAL to answer my CLARIFYING and inquisitive questions could SHOW and PROVE otherwise.promethean75 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:06 pm My inquiry is for the purposes of science. I pass no judgement here and only wish to collect relevant data.
WHAT?simplicity wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 6:48 pmYou need to be the one who you are directing your questions to because you are the only one can answer them [actually, you already know the answers...you just need to clear out all the thinking to be able to find them].Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:51 am WHY are 'you', posters, here completely and utterly INCAPABLE of CHALLENGING 'me' on what I SAY, WRITE and CLAIM here?
Also, WHY are 'you', posters, completely and utterly UNABLE to just even ATTEMPT to back up and support what you SAY, WRITE, and CLAIM here...
...But, until then, I am OPEN and READY for EVERY and ANY CHALLENGE AT ALL.
Read all of this "wall of text". Refuse to acknowledge ABSURD CLAIMS here. BECAUSE if you HAD READ my "wall of text", then what thee ACTUAL Truth could have been CLEARLY SEEN.Atla wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 7:56 pmSkipped most of this wall of text. So you admit that you can't even read back a few lines.Age wrote: ↑Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:56 amALL you REALLY SAY is; "You can NOT do what you say and claim you can do".
Which is what ONLY the WEAK and SCARED would say.
PROVE me Wrong instead of just SAYING, "I am wrong".
I READ what you WROTE. And, I have ALREADY POINTED OUT and SHOWN WHEN and WHERE you ARE Wrong.
Which is EXACTLY the OPPOSITE of what you have EVER been ABLE to do with 'me'.
So, you can keep TRYING.
Oh, and by the way, what was 'it' AGAIN you want to KEEP CLAIMING I can NOT READ?
Your ABILITY, or LACK there of, in EXPLAINING 'things' here will SHOW and PROVE MORE about 'you' than about 'me'.
SEE, ONLY the VERY WEAK would ACCUSE "another" of "NOT being able to read", but NEVER provide ANY ACTUAL supporting evidence NOR proof.
I will NOW SHOW what ACTUALLY TOOK PLACE here. This is what 'supporting evidence AND proof' ACTUALLY looks like.
You wrote:
Why do you keep commenting here, [to another] when the value of any contribution including yours is ZERO?
I wrote:
This appears to be an EXTREMELY FUNNY thing to say. Especially considering the Fact that you have just commented here, when, SUPPOSEDLY, the value of absolutely ANY contribution at all (including YOUR OWN) will be ZERO as well. So, WHY did you comment here?
Besides the Fact that you have completely and utterly FAILED, ONCE AGAIN, to just answer the VERY OPEN and SIMPLE CLARIFYING question here, all you could manage to say and write was;
"Learn to read".
Now, since my reply ADDRESSED absolutely EVERY thing you said and wrote absolutely ACCURATELY, your response of, "Learn to read", is even MORE HILARIOUS for us to OBSERVE and SEE. And, since I POINTED OUT and SHOWED just how ABSURD, RIDICULOUS, and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY was all you have 'tried to' do here is TRY and DEFLECT with the ABSURD words, "Learn to read" and "Try harder".
LOOK, we have ALL SEEN, very CLEARLY, I will add, just HOW ABSURD and ILLOGICAL your question REALLY WAS. You can NOT ESCAPE this Fact NOW, no matter how MUCH or how MANY TIMES you 'try to' DEFLECT. The ONLY 'one' you are DECEIVING here is "your" 'self'.
Okay, if you say SO, and BELIEVE SO, then 'it' MUST BE SO, correct?
You asked such a thing like 50 times in the past, and you were incorrect 50 times. Bit slow on the uptake I guess.
I already wrote it down like 3 times: you can't read back.Now, are you BRAVE enough to INFORM us of what was the, alleged, "ACTUAL truth", which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, "told", and which I, "AS USUAL", am the ONLY 'one' who does NOT see 'it'?
And, if 'you' are NOT BRAVE ENOUGH, then MAYBE ANY of 'you', alleged, "other ones" who DOES see "the ACTUAL truth" here, which was TOLD by the one known as "atla" here, then MAYBE 'you' will SAY what "this ACTUAL truth" is, EXACTLY?
(skip wall of text)
LOL you, after ALL this time, STILL can NOT READ and COMPREHEND correctly.
Yes you HAVE BEEN.
LOLAtla wrote: ↑Sat Feb 19, 2022 6:19 amI already wrote it down like 3 times: you can't read back.Now, are you BRAVE enough to INFORM us of what was the, alleged, "ACTUAL truth", which you have, SUPPOSEDLY, "told", and which I, "AS USUAL", am the ONLY 'one' who does NOT see 'it'?
And, if 'you' are NOT BRAVE ENOUGH, then MAYBE ANY of 'you', alleged, "other ones" who DOES see "the ACTUAL truth" here, which was TOLD by the one known as "atla" here, then MAYBE 'you' will SAY what "this ACTUAL truth" is, EXACTLY?
(skip wall of text)
I didn't say that the question is incorrect, again it's you who fails at basic comprehension (for all your imagined 'readers' to see
But I NEVER said, that you said, that the question is incorrect.