Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:57 pm
There are lots of stories in all directions. Because there are countless storytellers and agendas.
A mountain of stories is not an indication of truth. Rather, if not clearly for entertainment purposes, it can be an indication of excessive and creative intoxication and (in some cases) desperation.
Unfortunately, a path based on stories intoxicates further with every step. Building a monument unto itself. It must keep growing because one is driven to justify and glorify their journey. Even if that journey leads to absurdity or over a cliff. The quietness of simple truth can feel more terrifying and unknown than the nonsense noise (or even horror) one has pledged themselves to. One might even prefer to die without denouncing their stories/fantasies, rather than face what feels like death of their ego (which they mistakenly identify with). In that way, one's ego becomes a jailer, rather than simply a playmate.
Truth is clearest in the present moment -- setting all stories aside. One cannot perceive or function clearly if they are in service to stories. Stories seem more intended to drive truth than to reveal it. Because without the story, there is no controlling power.
That's why I say: do not believe stories, do not follow stories, and do not create stories -- unless you can clearly remember such creations are not actually a reflection of truth, they are manufacturing/limiting it for a purpose. It is useful (and more empowering) to be able to step aside from stories at any moment, and see with clarity beyond them.
Well, links are a departure point that can be commonly shared for discussion. Plain and simple.
Many links mean many possible departure points, which encourages diverse interests and perhaps discussion for many departure points, or portals to fresh insights, that need not be restricted to those so freely and generously shared.
However, a dialoguer’s unsubstantiated assertions, fueled perhaps by personal belief or childhood experiences now forgotten, don’t afford much of a common departure point for discussion. I mean, it ends up just being one side yammering on about what they believe.
Thus, without links or some personal, rational progression of thought, the dialogue doesn’t get much past the shore, although the deep water is out there, as I recall.
Which is all to say Thread Hostess, you sounded like you could use a link or two, or more.
