Philosophy Now Forum

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:02 pm

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 1:31 pm

So can you clarify what your position is regarding the following:

1) Do you think all adult human beings are to blame for all the world's problems?

Yes.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 1:31 pm Feel free to elaborate on the answer.

1. I used the word, Wrong, so why did you 'now' use the word, 'problem', instead?

2. To me the word, 'problem', means, a question posed for a solution. Only human beings pose questions. Therefore, if all adult human beings can and do ask questions, posed for solutions, then all adult human beings cause and create all of the not best wording, 'world's problems'.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 1:31 pm 2) Are you also responsible for all the world's problems or are you not also responsible for all the world's problems?

Yes.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 1:31 pm Feel free to elaborate on the answer.

i also do ask some of all of the questions, in the world, which are posed for solutions.

By the way I do not just feel free to elaborate on 'my answer', here, but I am always actually free to elaborate on each and every answer I provide.

Thank you for your answers.

1) So when you say that all adult human beings are responsible for all the world's wrongs, and that you include yourself as responsible for all the world's wrongs, why do you use the term "you adult human beings" so much when discussing the topic?

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm Wouldn't it be more accurate for you to use the phrase "we adult human beings" when discussing who is responsible for all the wrongs in the world?

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm Otherwise, I never would have known that you also blame yourself, had I not specifically asked that question to you once.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm Since you often say that you are trying to learn to better communicate with us, perhaps it would be closer to the truth if you used the word, "we".

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm 2) You're a bad person, Age.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm You are responsible for all the wrongs that occur in the world.

Gary Childress wrote: ↑Sun Oct 05, 2025 2:22 pm You should be ashamed of yourself, killing innocent children who have done nothing. That's horrible, Age.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:55 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 3:16 pm Age—

I suggest that you utilize AI to edit your posts for clarity before submitting them. ChatGPT is relatively inexpensive. There are also some free applications out there.

Thank you but there is already clarity in my posts. As can be very clearly seen.

I will now, again, suggest that if there is absolutely any thing in absolutely any of my posts that is not yet clear nor well understood, to absolutely any one, then just ask me a clarifying question or questions. I suggest just doing this until absolute clarity has been obtained, and gained. And, once again, the more specific the question asked is for clarity sake, then the more specific, and thus the more clarity, my answer can, and will, be.

Obviously there eis not a single one who can write with absolute clarity for absolutely every one, which obviously includes any of those so-called 'artificially intelligent' machines. So, if any one is not yet fully clear on what some one write, then I will again suggest that while that one is still alive and able to respond, then that is 'the one' who questions for clarity sake are directed at. After all they are the absolutely only one who Truly knows what 'the words' were actually intended to mean, fully, and exactly. Obviously, if human beings, who are the only ones with 'real' intelligence are not yet fully clear on some thing, then any so-called only 'artificially' intelligent one might also not be able to express 'it' clearly, as well.

But, if one expects that an 'artificially intelligent' contraption can, and will, make some thing clear/er, then, to 'that one' anyway, 'they' will start putting their faith and/or belief in, and maybe even completely trusting, 'artificial intelligence' instead, and/or even only.

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, here, in this post or in any other post, then I will say 'this' once more, if absolutely any thing is unclear or not yet understood, then just ask the writer or speaker, while they are still alive, for clarification, because there is absolutely no other one/thing that could provide you with the most Truest, Right, Accurate and Correct clarity.

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 9:01 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:55 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 3:16 pm Age—

I suggest that you utilize AI to edit your posts for clarity before submitting them. ChatGPT is relatively inexpensive. There are also some free applications out there.

Thank you but there is already clarity in my posts. As can be very clearly seen.

I will now, again, suggest that if there is absolutely any thing in absolutely any of my posts that is not yet clear nor well understood, to absolutely any one, then just ask me a clarifying question or questions. I suggest just doing this until absolute clarity has been obtained, and gained. And, once again, the more specific the question asked is for clarity sake, then the more specific, and thus the more clarity, my answer can, and will, be.

Obviously there eis not a single one who can write with absolute clarity for absolutely every one, which obviously includes any of those so-called 'artificially intelligent' machines. So, if any one is not yet fully clear on what some one write, then I will again suggest that while that one is still alive and able to respond, then that is 'the one' who questions for clarity sake are directed at. After all they are the absolutely only one who Truly knows what 'the words' were actually intended to mean, fully, and exactly. Obviously, if human beings, who are the only ones with 'real' intelligence are not yet fully clear on some thing, then any so-called only 'artificially' intelligent one might also not be able to express 'it' clearly, as well.

But, if one expects that an 'artificially intelligent' contraption can, and will, make some thing clear/er, then, to 'that one' anyway, 'they' will start putting their faith and/or belief in, and maybe even completely trusting, 'artificial intelligence' instead, and/or even only.

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, here, in this post or in any other post, then I will say 'this' once more, if absolutely any thing is unclear or not yet understood, then just ask the writer or speaker, while they are still alive, for clarification, because there is absolutely no other one/thing that could provide you with the most Truest, Right, Accurate and Correct clarity.

It is unclear why you think that clarifying questions can resolve miscommunications faster or more simply than starting with a system taught to use syntax that is understandable to the broadest general audience.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:01 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 9:01 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 11:55 pm

Thank you but there is already clarity in my posts. As can be very clearly seen.

I will now, again, suggest that if there is absolutely any thing in absolutely any of my posts that is not yet clear nor well understood, to absolutely any one, then just ask me a clarifying question or questions. I suggest just doing this until absolute clarity has been obtained, and gained. And, once again, the more specific the question asked is for clarity sake, then the more specific, and thus the more clarity, my answer can, and will, be.

Obviously there eis not a single one who can write with absolute clarity for absolutely every one, which obviously includes any of those so-called 'artificially intelligent' machines. So, if any one is not yet fully clear on what some one write, then I will again suggest that while that one is still alive and able to respond, then that is 'the one' who questions for clarity sake are directed at. After all they are the absolutely only one who Truly knows what 'the words' were actually intended to mean, fully, and exactly. Obviously, if human beings, who are the only ones with 'real' intelligence are not yet fully clear on some thing, then any so-called only 'artificially' intelligent one might also not be able to express 'it' clearly, as well.

But, if one expects that an 'artificially intelligent' contraption can, and will, make some thing clear/er, then, to 'that one' anyway, 'they' will start putting their faith and/or belief in, and maybe even completely trusting, 'artificial intelligence' instead, and/or even only.

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, here, in this post or in any other post, then I will say 'this' once more, if absolutely any thing is unclear or not yet understood, then just ask the writer or speaker, while they are still alive, for clarification, because there is absolutely no other one/thing that could provide you with the most Truest, Right, Accurate and Correct clarity.

It is unclear why you think that clarifying questions can resolve miscommunications faster or more simply than starting with a system taught to use syntax that is understandable to the broadest general audience.

And, once again, what 'we' have, here, is another prime example of just how much of 'curiosity' and the 'art of just seeking out actual clarity' had been completely lost and gone.

'This one', here, just proved, once more, that adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, would not just 'seek out' 'actual clarification', and instead much preferred to just presume that 'they knew better, and/or knew more'.

The 'art of gaining clarity, and thus also of obtaining understanding itself, had been lost, completely, because of wanting to 'listen to' "one's" 'self' only, and through the 'insistence that one's own already assumptions and beliefs were what is actually true and right, in Life.

Now, if 'this one' does not change, then it will forever remain unclear, here.

What 'this one' just did shows a prime example of why 'they', back then, remained 'unclear' of, and about, things, and also why 'they' remained so long without understanding each other, and thus remained living so long without 'the understanding' of "themselves".

And, 'I' have not even begun to discuss how it is, only, the speaker/writer "them" 'self', and only 'that one', only, who knows the actual intended ''meaning'.

So, only by asking 'that one', only, for clarification, can the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct understanding and clarity be obtained, and gained.

Absolutely every 'artificially intelligent machine, just like every 'actual intelligent human being', are all fallible when they make assumptions about what 'another' actually meant, and/or actually intended.

And, obviously, without 'seeking out', and obtaining, and gaining, 'actual clarification', from only the 'very one', only, who spoke or wrote, then every 'inference' made is just 'an assumption'. Which, also obviously, will always remain possibly fully or partly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, or Incorrect 'unclear', leaving the listener or reader always 'unclear', confused, or not yet with having gained 'understanding', itself.

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:49 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:01 pm

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 9:01 pm

It is unclear why you think that clarifying questions can resolve miscommunications faster or more simply than starting with a system taught to use syntax that is understandable to the broadest general audience.

And, once again, what 'we' have, here, is another prime example of just how much of 'curiosity' and the 'art of just seeking out actual clarity' had been completely lost and gone.

'This one', here, just proved, once more, that adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, would not just 'seek out' 'actual clarification', and instead much preferred to just presume that 'they knew better, and/or knew more'.

The 'art of gaining clarity, and thus also of obtaining understanding itself, had been lost, completely, because of wanting to 'listen to' "one's" 'self' only, and through the 'insistence that one's own already assumptions and beliefs were what is actually true and right, in Life.

Now, if 'this one' does not change, then it will forever remain unclear, here.

What 'this one' just did shows a prime example of why 'they', back then, remained 'unclear' of, and about, things, and also why 'they' remained so long without understanding each other, and thus remained living so long without 'the understanding' of "themselves".

And, 'I' have not even begun to discuss how it is, only, the speaker/writer "them" 'self', and only 'that one', only, who knows the actual intended ''meaning'.

So, only by asking 'that one', only, for clarification, can the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct understanding and clarity be obtained, and gained.

Absolutely every 'artificially intelligent machine, just like every 'actual intelligent human being', are all fallible when they make assumptions about what 'another' actually meant, and/or actually intended.

And, obviously, without 'seeking out', and obtaining, and gaining, 'actual clarification', from only the 'very one', only, who spoke or wrote, then every 'inference' made is just 'an assumption'. Which, also obviously, will always remain possibly fully or partly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, or Incorrect 'unclear', leaving the listener or reader always 'unclear', confused, or not yet with having gained 'understanding', itself.

Your content is impossible to follow.

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:50 pm How much of a desperate pathetic suckup handmaiden would someone need to be to dedicate an entire thread to Kenny the clown?

Age wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 12:18 am

commonsense wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:49 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 10:01 pm

And, once again, what 'we' have, here, is another prime example of just how much of 'curiosity' and the 'art of just seeking out actual clarity' had been completely lost and gone.

'This one', here, just proved, once more, that adult human beings, in the days when this was being written, would not just 'seek out' 'actual clarification', and instead much preferred to just presume that 'they knew better, and/or knew more'.

The 'art of gaining clarity, and thus also of obtaining understanding itself, had been lost, completely, because of wanting to 'listen to' "one's" 'self' only, and through the 'insistence that one's own already assumptions and beliefs were what is actually true and right, in Life.

Now, if 'this one' does not change, then it will forever remain unclear, here.

What 'this one' just did shows a prime example of why 'they', back then, remained 'unclear' of, and about, things, and also why 'they' remained so long without understanding each other, and thus remained living so long without 'the understanding' of "themselves".

And, 'I' have not even begun to discuss how it is, only, the speaker/writer "them" 'self', and only 'that one', only, who knows the actual intended ''meaning'.

So, only by asking 'that one', only, for clarification, can the True, Right, Accurate, and Correct understanding and clarity be obtained, and gained.

Absolutely every 'artificially intelligent machine, just like every 'actual intelligent human being', are all fallible when they make assumptions about what 'another' actually meant, and/or actually intended.

And, obviously, without 'seeking out', and obtaining, and gaining, 'actual clarification', from only the 'very one', only, who spoke or wrote, then every 'inference' made is just 'an assumption'. Which, also obviously, will always remain possibly fully or partly False, Wrong, Inaccurate, or Incorrect 'unclear', leaving the listener or reader always 'unclear', confused, or not yet with having gained 'understanding', itself.

Your content is impossible to follow.

For 'you' maybe.

Have you considered asking some 'artificial intelligent machine' to 'translate' it for you, so that you could then follow and understand it?

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:29 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:50 pm How much of a desperate pathetic suckup handmaiden would someone need to be to dedicate an entire thread to Kenny the clown?

How much of a desperate pathetic put-downer billy-no mates would a nobody like you need to dedicate your entire sad trauma filled low life, so hopelessly scarred beyond repair that all it can do now is humiliate,mock and ridicule others just to attract some sort of purpose or meaning to their pitiful broken life.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:46 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:29 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Thu Oct 09, 2025 11:50 pm How much of a desperate pathetic suckup handmaiden would someone need to be to dedicate an entire thread to Kenny the clown?

How much of a desperate pathetic put-downer billy-no mates would a nobody like you need to dedicate your entire sad trauma filled low life, so hopelessly scarred beyond repair that all it can do now is humiliate,mock and ridicule others just to attract some sort of purpose or meaning to their pitiful broken life.

Oh right, and you and kenny are paragons of virtue and kindness I haven't noticed that anyone is exactly 'nice' to me on here either. I don't cry about it. The egos on this site are beyond belief. I've never seen so many god-complexes squeezed into one space.

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:49 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:46 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:29 am

How much of a desperate pathetic put-downer billy-no mates would a nobody like you need to dedicate your entire sad trauma filled low life, so hopelessly scarred beyond repair that all it can do now is humiliate,mock and ridicule others just to attract some sort of purpose or meaning to their pitiful broken life.

Oh right, and you and kenny are paragons of virtue and kindness I haven't noticed that anyone is exactly 'nice' to me on here either. I don't cry about it. The egos on this site are beyond belief. I've never seen so many god-complexes squeezed into one space.

Oh, just Cry me an ocean.

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:56 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:49 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:46 am

Oh right, and you and kenny are paragons of virtue and kindness I haven't noticed that anyone is exactly 'nice' to me on here either. I don't cry about it. The egos on this site are beyond belief. I've never seen so many god-complexes squeezed into one space.

Oh, just Cry me an ocean.

What a stupid comment. It's hilarious that you of all people would mention 'humiliation'. You seem to revel in it especially when you can inflict it on someone else (rhymes with bar ball). You do realise that there is such a thing as a humiliation fetish don't you? I thought it was just a male thing but evidently not.

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 6:09 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:56 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 10, 2025 5:49 am

Oh, just Cry me an ocean.

What a stupid comment. It's hilarious that you of all people would mention 'humiliation'. You seem to revel in it especially when you can inflict it on someone else (rhymes with bar ball). You do realise that there is such a thing as a humiliation fetish don't you? I thought it was just a male thing but evidently not.

Predicable response as usual.

I knew you were going to bring H into this again, you are disturbingly obsessed with the H and F saga.

Respect is earned , not given.

Harbal hurt me, so I hurt him back. We met on this forum, we loved on this forum, and we hated on this forum. This forum was our lives. It’s still my life even now.

Ever heard of the scorned woman? Until men learn not to mess with women’s hearts and emotions, they will only reap what they sow. This forum was my perfect sweet revenge. I have no regrets for what I caused here.