Questions to Age

[Age]

So, is what you are saying and claiming, here, is that those brothers did what they did, that is, just create, fly, and land a plane because they were greedy, selfish, wanted to be the first or for fame, and/or to just do some thing different?

If yes ...

No.

So, what then are the actual reasons why they did what they did, exactly?

And, if you do not answer, then one is left with the reasons that you have already provided, which, essentially, are just greedy, selfish, want to be the first, for fame, and/or to just do some thing different.

It would be rather presumptuous to place such limitations upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight (which excludes the flight of falling off a cliff).

LOL 'Those capable of first human flight'. Every one of you human beings had the capability of first human flight. How presumptuous of you to place such limitation upon you other human beings.

In the future history of the world I'll maybe get around to reading what you wrote after your assumption of "yes" placed limitations upon your own understanding of those who first transcended gravity.

LOL you, obviously, did not even read and understand the question I posed, and asked you above, here.

I suggest reading it, and then notice that every one of the things I asked were what you actually said and wrote, here.

Did you answer what are the 'other reasons' why they did what they did?

If no, then, obviously, some or all of the reasons I put in 'my question' to 'you' must be true.

[commonsense]

Age—

I suggest that you utilize AI to edit your posts for clarity before submitting them. ChatGPT is relatively inexpensive. There are also some free applications out there.

[Walker]

Oh don't be silly, Age. To clarify, the limitations that you placed upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight were caused by erroneously assuming that only the articulated aspects of the flyers’ dreams were the totality of their dreams and the sole cause of their pioneering, when in fact such a projection of limitation applies to no human bean, and especially not those mortals whose self-concepts very well may have had an extra ration of the Icarus gene adjusting the frequency of their phenomena reception, which is the gene that tickles everyone’s fancy just a bit when they gaze upwards in emptiness meditation, into the realms where the eagles soar.

(It’s not a run-on … it’s a walk-on.)

[Age]

Oh don't be silly, Age. To clarify, the limitations that you placed upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight were caused by erroneously assuming that only the articulated aspects of the flyers’ dreams were the totality of their dreams and the sole cause of their pioneering, when in fact such a projection of limitation applies to no human bean, and especially not those mortals whose self-concepts very well may have had an extra ration of the Icarus gene adjusting the frequency of their phenomena reception, which is the gene that tickles everyone’s fancy just a bit when they gaze upwards in emptiness meditation, into the realms where the eagles soar.

(It’s not a run-on … it’s a walk-on.)

Here, is another prime example of attempting to deflect. The very reasons I asked you about were the very ones you were wrote down and were claiming. I just presented your own words and reasons in a more honest way.

That you do not want to 'look at' the Truth I presented, and so you do not want to answer my question honestly, shows another example of how and why 'these types of people' continued on down their downhill spiral of demise.

Honesty always was and is the 'the way' up, and out, but even just getting 'these people', back when this was being written to just answer the most simplest and easiest questions, with the most simplest and easiest Honest answers was like an impossible task. As can be clearly seen throughout this forum.

[Walker]

Well, the original answer to your query was, "No." Answers don't get much simpler and honest than that, especially at this time in the history of the world.

So, you requested an explanation, and that's where comprehension failed you, which is not my fault, however failed comprehension is the reason why Truth is self-protected.

[Walker]

So, is what you are saying and claiming, here, is that those brothers did what they did, that is, just create, fly, and land a plane because they were greedy, selfish, wanted to be the first or for fame, and/or to just do some thing different?

If yes ...

No.

The receipt.

[Age]

Age—

I suggest that you utilize AI to edit your posts for clarity before submitting them. ChatGPT is relatively inexpensive. There are also some free applications out there.

Thank you but there is already clarity in my posts. As can be very clearly seen.

I will now, again, suggest that if there is absolutely any thing in absolutely any of my posts that is not yet clear nor well understood, to absolutely any one, then just ask me a clarifying question or questions. I suggest just doing this until absolute clarity has been obtained, and gained. And, once again, the more specific the question asked is for clarity sake, then the more specific, and thus the more clarity, my answer can, and will, be.

Obviously there eis not a single one who can write with absolute clarity for absolutely every one, which obviously includes any of those so-called 'artificially intelligent' machines. So, if any one is not yet fully clear on what some one write, then I will again suggest that while that one is still alive and able to respond, then that is 'the one' who questions for clarity sake are directed at. After all they are the absolutely only one who Truly knows what 'the words' were actually intended to mean, fully, and exactly. Obviously, if human beings, who are the only ones with 'real' intelligence are not yet fully clear on some thing, then any so-called only 'artificially' intelligent one might also not be able to express 'it' clearly, as well.

But, if one expects that an 'artificially intelligent' contraption can, and will, make some thing clear/er, then, to 'that one' anyway, 'they' will start putting their faith and/or belief in, and maybe even completely trusting, 'artificial intelligence' instead, and/or even only.

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, here, in this post or in any other post, then I will say 'this' once more, if absolutely any thing is unclear or not yet understood, then just ask the writer or speaker, while they are still alive, for clarification, because there is absolutely no other one/thing that could provide you with the most Truest, Right, Accurate and Correct clarity.

[Age]

Well, the original answer to your query was, "No." Answers don't get much simpler and honest than that, especially at this time in the history of the world.

So, you requested an explanation, and that's where comprehension failed you, which is not my fault, however failed comprehension is the reason why Truth is self-protected.

I requested an explanation about, when I provided you with a list of the exact reasons that you provided, with the use of the 'or' word, how and why you could then answer with a 'No'.

If they are not the reasons, then, again, what are, exactly?

[Walker]

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, ...

I think anyone who reads your words is pretty clear about what your words actually mean, Age. I-for-one get a good chuckle out of your questions but this isn't exactly one-for-all and all-for-one Muskateer territory now, is it.

[Walker]

Already responded.

[Age]

Now, if some thing is unclear in what I said and wrote, ...

I think anyone who reads your words is pretty clear about what your words actually mean, Age. I-for-one get a good chuckle out of your questions but this isn't exactly one-for-all and all-for-one Muskateer territory now, is it.

LOL 'This', here, is in complete opposition with what another poster said and wrote only seven posts before this post of yours.

So, which one of you is on the 'right track and path', here, exactly?

Do my words need to be edited for clarity, or, is the meaning of my words, actually, pretty clear to any one who reads them?

And, if what my words mean are, actually, pretty clear, to you, why can you not comprehend what 'it' is, exactly, that I want you to clear up, and clarify?

[Age]

Already responded.

Just 'responding' is not necessarily 'answering', 'nor clarifying', at all.

Saying and claiming that 'you responded' never necessarily means absolutely any thing at all, other than, of course, that you have 'just responded', only.

Look, if you do not just want to just answer, and clarify, because you would then just contradict "yourself", then I totally understand why do you not answer, and clarify.

[Walker]

Already responded.

Just 'responding' is not necessarily 'answering', 'nor clarifying', at all.

Saying and claiming that 'you responded' never necessarily means absolutely any thing at all, other than, of course, that you have 'just responded', only.

Look, if you do not just want to just answer, and clarify, because you would then just contradict "yourself", then I totally understand why do you not answer, and clarify.

Already responded with clarifications, even now.

*

First clarification:
No. It would be rather presumptuous to place such limitations upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight (which excludes the flight of falling off a cliff).


Second clarification:
To clarify, the limitations that you placed upon the dreams of those capable of first human flight were caused by erroneously assuming that only the articulated aspects of the flyers’ dreams were the totality of their dreams and the sole cause of their pioneering, when in fact such a projection of limitation applies to no human bean, and especially not those mortals whose self-concepts very well may have had an extra ration of the Icarus gene adjusting the frequency of their phenomena reception, which is the gene that tickles everyone’s fancy just a bit when they gaze upwards in emptiness meditation, into the realms where the eagles soar.

[Walker]

This thread is titled:
Questions to Age

This thread is not titled:
Questions from Age

(neither is it titled, advice from Age)

Entitled?

Obviously, since this thread is not about you asking questions, it's about you figuring things out without the usual crutch, which is good practice what with the children being trained to consult AI with questions, rather than think.

*

Question for Age:

Age, did you ever see this particular Wizard of Id cartoon?
It's from long ago when there were newspapers, but so far it remains hidden somewhere in the web.

*

Wizard: Sire, this is Sir Edmund Hillary. He was the first to climb the highest mountain in the world.

King: Why did you climb it?

Sir Edmund Hillary: Because it was there.

King: Don’t go to the beach.

[Fairy]

Age…The truth is not the truth.

Is that statement true or false, Age?