Philosophy Now Forum

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:58 am**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:55 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:49 am
attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:43 am

NO. I didn't you bottom feeding scum.

Oh, this could be fun ---> like what?
These were your words:

The disgusting Queer wants facial recognition implemented and insists everyone that is vocally opposed to illegal immigration are "FAR-RIGHT" --- "THUGS"
This is not true, you know it's not true. You are a troll who has nothing but lies to spread.
Actually it IS VERY TRUE.

1 min 15 secs in - "FAR-RIGHT THUGERY" --- > NOT - I NEED TO LISTEN TO THE AVERAGE BRIT THAT IS DISGUSTED AT MASS IMMIGRATION

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7KCQRl ... ex=4&t=11s

You lying little shit, he says far right thuggery and just before, he lists all the things he's calling far right thuggery, and if you weren't such a lying little shit you'd acknowledge that in that list of things isn't "everyone that is vocally opposed to illegal immigration".

So stop lying you little shit, grow a spine and tell the truth for once.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:00 pm**

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:56 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:52 amIf Fishpi says that he had no opinion about the guys religion, that's just more lies.
The crazy thing is, if he just stopped lying, and honestly represented what he really believes and why he really believes it, we would have more in common than he expects.

THE PROBLEM U HAVE IS EVIDENCE THAT I LIE. u disgusting scum.

Flannel Jesus wrote:But he's too much of a coward ...

THAT IS SOMETHING U NEED TO EARN - to CALL ME A COWARD ---> u pathetic SCUM.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:02 pm**

Flannel Jesus ---> U R a LIAR and SCUM <--- that is my TRUTH AS A CHRISTIAN.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:03 pm**

And watch him devolve into Age before our very eyes. Is this the origin story for Age? Attofish loses his mind, finds a time machine in 20 years and comes back in time to annoy everyone as Age?

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:06 pm**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:58 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:52 am
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:41 am I've answered that already. You definitely said the child killer was Muslim before you deleted your historical posts
The point of naming the kid as Ali Al-Shakati was obviously to mark him as a Muslim.
Really? --> his name is this ---> Rudakubana

So what does that do for simple folk such as me

Seemingly nothing that is going to help you shrug off accusations of racism.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:09 pm**

Are you calling me a racist?

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:11 pm**

I was answering your vague question. Be less vague if you don't want to vaguely suspect you are being accused.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:58 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:52 am
The point of naming the kid as Ali Al-Shakati was obviously to mark him as a Muslim.
Really? --> his name is this ---> Rudakubana

So what does that do for simple folk such as me

Seemingly nothing that is going to help you shrug off accusations of racism.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:12 pm**

All the little liar has to do is say

I was incorrect when I said that Starmer said everyone that is vocally opposed to illegal immigration are "FAR-RIGHT" --- "THUGS". He didn't say that, I know he didn't say that, and I apologise for not backing down from this claim even after I knew he didn't say that. I understand why everyone thinks I'm dishonest, I will try to be more honest and truthful in the future.

Does the little liar have the balls to say something like that?

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:12 pm**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:11 pm I was answering your vague question. Be less vague if you don't want to vaguely suspect you are being accused.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:58 am
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:52 am
The point of naming the kid as Ali Al-Shakati was obviously to mark him as a Muslim.
Really? --> his name is this ---> Rudakubana

So what does that do for simple folk such as me
Seemingly nothing that is going to help you shrug off accusations of racism.

Are you calling me a racist?

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:15 pm**

And for the record, comparing these riots being dubbed as thuggery to Leeds is really silly. Kier Starmer clearly condemned the Leeds Harehill riot similarly.

https://news.sky.com/story/leeds-riotin ... r-13180957

It came after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer condemned the "shocking and disgraceful" rioting in Leeds and gave his full support to police in "taking the strongest possible action" against the perpetrators.

So this implication that he's having some kind of double standard there seems absurd to me

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:16 pm**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:12 pm
FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:11 pm I was answering your vague question. Be less vague if you don't want to vaguely suspect you are being accused.

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:58 am

Really? --> his name is this ---> Rudakubana

So what does that do for simple folk such as me
Seemingly nothing that is going to help you shrug off accusations of racism.
Are you calling me a racist?

Well what non racist thing did you mean by
"Really? --> his name is this ---> Rudakubana

So what does that do for simple folk such as me "?

In the context of a reply to me writing that "The point of naming the kid as Ali Al-Shakati was obviously to mark him as a Muslim."

It sure looks like you are hinting at someting you don't dare write in real words. But go on, show us that bravery of yours and tell us.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:19 pm**

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:16 pmBut go on, show us that bravery of yours and tell us.

Ugh all the talking in riddles is so annoying. He's too ashamed of his own beliefs to just say clearly, "this is what I believe, this is why I believe it". He has to tip toe around everything and leave little clues about what he really thinks.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:20 pm**

Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:15 pm And for the record, comparing these riots being dubbed as thuggery to Leeds is really silly. Kier Starmer clearly condemned the Leeds Harehill riot similarly.

https://news.sky.com/story/leeds-riotin ... r-13180957

It came after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer condemned the "shocking and disgraceful" rioting in Leeds and gave his full support to police in "taking the strongest possible action" against the perpetrators.
So this implication that he's having some kind of double standard there seems absurd to me

Nooo oooo ye simple sprat..

Starmer is stating "FAR RIGHT THUGS" "RACISTS" "NAZI SALUTERS" <<--- I have yet to see in ANY footage what supports Queer Starmers claim - and insistence that BRITISH people that are pissed off with uncontrolled borders are doing NAZI salutes ----> however IT MAKES SENSE for his STATEMENT that the BRITISH RIOTERS are just RACISTS.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:22 pm**

attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:20 pm
Flannel Jesus wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:15 pm And for the record, comparing these riots being dubbed as thuggery to Leeds is really silly. Kier Starmer clearly condemned the Leeds Harehill riot similarly.

https://news.sky.com/story/leeds-riotin ... r-13180957

It came after Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer condemned the "shocking and disgraceful" rioting in Leeds and gave his full support to police in "taking the strongest possible action" against the perpetrators.
So this implication that he's having some kind of double standard there seems absurd to me
Nooo oooo ye simple sprat..

Starmer is stating "FAR RIGHT THUGS" "RACISTS" "NAZI SALUTERS" <<--- I have yet to see in ANY footage what supports Queer Starmers claim - and insistence that BRITISH people that are pissed off with uncontrolled borders are doing NAZI salutes ----> however IT MAKES SENSE for his STATEMENT that the BRITISH RIOTERS are just RACISTS.

Posted: **Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:23 pm**

yes...U keep banging on about that ONE image --- -WOW.

EVERYONE WAVING A BRITISH FLAG NOW LOVE THE NAZIS

Get ya GIMP suit off.. the NAZIS loved that shit

Philosophy Now Forum

Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?

Re: Why is it the "LEFT" think that they ONLY have the right to FREE SPEECH?