Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Disable your ad blocker to continue using our website.
Do people who are passionate about preventing further global warming also say that people who are indifferent to global warning are nowhere near as irritating as they themselves are? Or, do they find these indifferent people far more irritating than passionate people are?
I don't know what people who are passionate about global warming say, but I can't imagine their saying that those who are indifferent to it are less irritating than themselves. I guess they find indifferent people maddening and frustrating more than irritating.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:25 am
Do you know any one who is not fake in some way?
I know people who don't seem to be fake, but you can never be absolutely sure. I don't think there are many people who don't try to present a false impression of themself in some respect, and to some extent. What they are being misleading about could range from trivial to very significant.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:32 am
But necessity is not the mother of invention. Something else is.
I feel sure that necessity has often been a significant motivator behind innovation, even when it hasn't been the prime driver of it. What is the "Something else" that you consider to be the mother of invention?
Do people who are passionate about preventing further global warming also say that people who are indifferent to global warning are nowhere near as irritating as they themselves are? Or, do they find these indifferent people far more irritating than passionate people are?
I don't know what people who are passionate about global warming say, but I can't imagine their saying that those who are indifferent to it are less irritating than themselves. I guess they find indifferent people maddening and frustrating more than irritating.
Why guess what they may find when you do not even know what they say?
Also, if you do not know what they say, then why jump past irritating and guess they would find them maddening and frustrating?
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:25 am
Do you know any one who is not fake in some way?
I know people who don't seem to be fake, but you can never be absolutely sure.
But if someone was not fake in any way whatsoever at all, then this would imply that you could be absolutely sure about them.
And, vice-versa, if you can never be absolutely sure about sure about someone, then this implies that they are in fact being fake, in some way.
Harbal wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:45 am
I don't think there are many people who don't try to present a false impression of themself in some respect, and to some extent. What they are being misleading about could range from trivial to very significant.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:32 am
But necessity is not the mother of invention. Something else is.
I feel sure that necessity has often been a significant motivator behind innovation, even when it hasn't been the prime driver of it. What is the "Something else" that you consider to be the mother of invention?
Laziness.
And, because the environment that one was born and/or evolving into provides absolutely every thing necessary, which one needs. So, there is nothing new that is needed, and therefore there is no necessity.
Wanting, instead of necessity, I would say is more of a motivator behind innovation, than necessity is. See, every innovation was not needed, nor necessary, but they were obviously wanted. Like, for example, just about every innovation created, and if not just about every one of them, then all of those innovations.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:30 am
But the Universe did need human beings, or some other Truly intelligent species, to be born, for a particular reason.
Err, no, the universe needs human beings like an ocean needs water. So no, there is no need for human beings.
Just as the universe had no need for dinosaurs to exist only to later on extinct.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:56 am
Why guess what they may find when you do not even know what they say?
Because you asked me a question to which I didn't know the answer, but I didn't like to offer you nothing at all, so I offered you a guess. I'm sorry. In future when I don't know the answer to a question I will just say I don't know.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:56 am
Also, if you do not know what they say, then why jump past irritating and guess they would find them maddening and frustrating?
Again, for the same reason as above.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:56 am
But if someone was not fake in any way whatsoever at all, then this would imply that you could be absolutely sure about them.
Not necessarily, it might imply that they are a very convincing fake.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 11:56 am
And, vice-versa, if you can never be absolutely sure about sure about someone, then this implies that they are in fact being fake, in some way.
But implications are not proof of the presence of the things they imply.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:08 pm
Well since no one has said it in relation to your quoted statement, then there is no reason to assume that there will be, an error of judgment.
Splendid. That's one less thing we need concern ourselves with then.
Age wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:08 pm
Is that 'those others' who find people who feel very strongly indeed about things like passion are irritating, for example?
Yes, I have taken it upon myself to speak on behalf of those who find passionate people irritating.
Harbal wrote: ↑Wed Jul 27, 2022 12:30 pm
Some very impressive quotes there, and a few even look like something I might have said.
Yes, and while I will try to appear indifferent about the author, given my audience, my search gave me a better sense of someone's sense of humor. Kudos to that person, whomever he or she may be.
I like that last quote the best, of course. But I'm American...well, also English, dual and all. Though I find myself somewhere more woke (woker, filled with wokeness...?) than either of my native countries. Oh, sorry. Of course, nationalities are not relevant.
Carry on.