Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:29 pm
Lacewing wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 4:07 pm
So you claim "there is only one actual reality", yet you don't know what it is? Is that correct?
Yes and no.
See it all depends on what you actually mean by that question, what I have actually said, and/or if you truly want to understand.
Age...all of your word games, where you apply certain words (such as beliefs and assumptions) to people OTHER THAN yourself, while making your claims and assumptions that reveal beliefs behind them, is too dishonest and delusional to interact with.
I suggest that if you want to make claims, especially allegations about "another", then you at least have some supporting evidence to back up your claims and allegations. So, what is your supporting evidence for your claim and allegation that I have assumptions and beliefs.
If you do not list the alleged assumptions and beliefs, and then explain why to they are my assumptions and beliefs, then I am not able to defend the Self, and reveal thee actual Truth of things. Are you aware that what you see and think or believe is and could well be just your very own reality?
By the way, Knowing some thing is true is distinctly very different from assuming and/or believing some thing to be true.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pm Trying to present yourself as so distinctly different may be convincing to you, but your claims reveal a great deal regardless of how you insist that people don't understand what you're really saying. Everybody other than yourself is not inept. Whatever awareness you think you have appears to be convoluted by the beliefs and assumptions you keep denying that you have. So it's just a big lie that you challenge people to crack.
If this is what you see and believe is true, then this is only what you will see, and conclude.
Are you aware of the direct correlation between what a lot of human beings see in "others" is just a direct reflection of them, thy self?
By the way, I have NEVER even thought any one was inept, let alone said it. In fact I have mentioned a few times now already about the actual ABILITY and POTENTIAL within ALL human beings.
As for "cracking" 'thee code', your words are well on the way in helping this being achieved here.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pm
In the quotes above, I repeated exactly what you've been saying -- and you cannot even respond to it.
I responded to them. Obviously, just not in the way you liked nor hoped. See, your words were asked from a presumptive perspective, so my responses/answers were not of your wanting.
I responded to gauge how much interest you really have and how open you really are.
Also, from the Truly OPEN perspective there are a few ways to look at where your questions were coming from. So, the direct answers I provide could be all to easily misconstrued and/or misunderstood.
If you do not want to clarify yourself truly, then that is fine with me.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pmYou dance around saying "it depends what YOU mean by that question".
If you call what I did "dancing", then that is okay with me. I call that gauging how much one wants to clarify thy self.
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pm It's a simple clarifying question using your own words and you want to continually play games.
I answered your simple clarifying question with the very simple clarifying answer "Yes and no".
See, if your were truly interested in understanding my responses and answers, then you would ask further caring questions.
From one perspective, my answer is "yes", and, from another perspective my answer is "no". See, it all depends on what perspective you were asking that simple clarifying question from exactly.
So, what was your underlying intention in and meaning behind that question?
Lacewing wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 4:48 pmYou know nothing. You continually act like a delusional game-player. Until you can start being honest and generous rather than stroking your ego, you remain a self-absorbed phony.
If that is what you see and believe is true, then that is what you will continue to see, and conclude. Some might also say that that may well be also just some sort of 'self-reflection'.
By the way, a "phoney" in relation to 'what' exactly?