For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
My point is that Arising doesn't know how to spell the company's name, and can't even come close.Dalek Prime wrote:Actually Bob, Google, itself, is an accidental misspelling by the company founders, who wanted to name the company Googol.
I get that. But my point is, neither did the founder of the company. He wanted 'googol' (1.0e100), as in 'googolplex' (1.0e(googol)), not his misspelling of it. Hence the company name was a goof.bobevenson wrote:My point is that Arising doesn't know how to spell the company's name, and can't even come close.Dalek Prime wrote:Actually Bob, Google, itself, is an accidental misspelling by the company founders, who wanted to name the company Googol.
bobevenson wrote:My point is that Arising doesn't know how to spell the company's name, and can't even come close.
You are that thick!!Oh, now I get it, you're just jealous of another American success story!Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:My point is that Arising doesn't know how to spell the company's name, and can't even come close.
a) Google doesn't have a monopoly on anything, and b) it's a tough decision, but I won't stoop to using one of your laughing smilies in response to your suggestion that truth can be bought!Arising_uk wrote:I do have an issue with monopolies and market constraint and a definite philosophical one with the way truth is becoming defined algorithmically according to who pays.
You are an idiot upon all counts, check out their patent games and then look up SEO.bobevenson wrote:a) Google doesn't have a monopoly on anything, and b) it's a tough decision, but I won't stoop to using one of your laughing smilies in response to your suggestion that truth can be bought!