In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.uwot wrote:I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Which posts dummy? Let's hear your convoluted logic.HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.uwot wrote:I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
PhilX
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
-
Obvious Leo
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
You're a funny man, uwot.uwot wrote:Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
uwot wrote:Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
HexHammer wrote:Because very incompetent people only ruins a buisness, therefore should be fired because they serve no purpose.Lacewing wrote:Here's another one for you: Why do you choose to be an arrogant ass? Please do reveal the answer. If we're going to be subjected to it, I think we deserve to hear why it's the best you can come up with.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Yes, I could, but I won't.uwot wrote:Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Maybe you can get some fool to run a fool's errand and do it.
You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?HexHammer wrote: You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
-
Obvious Leo
- Posts: 4007
- Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Let me see if I've got this straight?HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.Obvious Leo wrote:Let me see if I've got this straight?HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
PhilX
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Nope, english isn't my first language.Harbal wrote:This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?HexHammer wrote: You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
Come let's talk danish and see how well you do.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.Obvious Leo wrote:Let me see if I've got this straight?HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
Let's add liar to your other stupid qualities, cockhead (for the benefit of my readers, it says BANNED under Hex's name at OPC. You don't see that under my name, shithead).HexHammer wrote:You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
PhilX
-
Philosophy Explorer
- Posts: 5621
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am
Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries
What a dope you must be Hex. I figured out that ofc = of course which isn't the standard abbreviation, loser.HexHammer wrote:If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.Obvious Leo wrote:Let me see if I've got this straight?HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).
As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).
There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)
Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
PhilX