Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

How does science work? And what's all this about quantum mechanics?

Moderators: AMod, iMod

User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

uwot wrote:
HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?
In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

HexHammer wrote:
uwot wrote:
HexHammer wrote:See folks, Philosphy Explore is a stalker and a troll, he trash talks people without contributing anything useful to the topic.
I'm not sure I agree, Mr Hammer. I think it is entirely reasonable to ask questions. I don't remember seeing you contribute anything to the thread that suggests you have the slightest idea about the chatacteristics of energy. Do you have anything useful to contribute?
In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Which posts dummy? Let's hear your convoluted logic.

PhilX
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by uwot »

HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
Obvious Leo
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
Location: Australia

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Obvious Leo »

uwot wrote:Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
You're a funny man, uwot.
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

uwot wrote:
HexHammer wrote:In 2 post in this thread, I gave 2 reasonable answers, just that you are not too bright to comprehend them.
Frankly, Mr Hammer, having searched, I'm not too bright to find them. Could you direct me to anything you have posted in this thread that you believe is a reasonable answer to the question posed?
HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
HexHammer wrote:
Lacewing wrote:Here's another one for you: Why do you choose to be an arrogant ass? Please do reveal the answer. If we're going to be subjected to it, I think we deserve to hear why it's the best you can come up with.
Because very incompetent people only ruins a buisness, therefore should be fired because they serve no purpose.
uwot
Posts: 6092
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:21 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by uwot »

HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

uwot wrote:
HexHammer wrote:All these silly questions should be answered in basic shool physics ..how is it that you not know of these things?
Perhaps because my schooling isn't as basic as yours, Mr Hammer. Could you tell us what your education told you about energy?
Yes, I could, but I won't.

You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!

Maybe you can get some fool to run a fool's errand and do it.

You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
User avatar
Harbal
Posts: 10729
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 10:03 pm
Location: Yorkshire
Contact:

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Harbal »

HexHammer wrote: You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?
Obvious Leo
Posts: 4007
Joined: Wed May 13, 2015 1:05 am
Location: Australia

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Obvious Leo »

HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?

We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).

As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).

There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)

Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

Obvious Leo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?

We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).

As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).

There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)

Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.

PhilX
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

Harbal wrote:
HexHammer wrote: You are an excellent example why philosophy are not in demand in the big buisness, because cozy chatters are clueless and doesn't understand the concept of relevance.
This is an interesting version of English, did you invent it yourself?
Nope, english isn't my first language.
Come let's talk danish and see how well you do.
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

Obvious Leo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?

We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).

As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).

There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)

Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.

Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
User avatar
HexHammer
Posts: 3353
Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:19 pm
Location: Denmark

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by HexHammer »

Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!

You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

HexHammer wrote:
Philosophy Explorer wrote:To make his usual pointless remarks and release his frustrations from getting kicked out of OPC plus he has an obvious superiority complex.
You have been here for some time now, and in all that time you have NEVER said anything intelligent, you have to have others to do very basic thinking for you, because you are a complete retard!!

You got banned from OPC because you were are complete retard only spamming the forum with useless posts.
Let's add liar to your other stupid qualities, cockhead (for the benefit of my readers, it says BANNED under Hex's name at OPC. You don't see that under my name, shithead).

PhilX
Philosophy Explorer
Posts: 5621
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2014 7:39 am

Re: Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries

Post by Philosophy Explorer »

HexHammer wrote:
Obvious Leo wrote:
HexHammer wrote:You like to talk about sub basic matters, that has no purpose, greatly wasting your time on nothing useful, but I don't like to waste my time, so no explenation, sorry!
Let me see if I've got this straight?

We have a topic entitled "Energy: Its characteristics and boundaries". (Tick).

As a philosopher of physics it occurs to me that this might be a topic of interest to me so I decide to take a look. (Tick).

There I find a loud-mouthed cockhead who has made no contribution to the conversation whatsoever beyond saying that talking about energy is a waste of time and doing so in a manner which is both offensive and illiterate. (Tick)

Hex. If you reckon this topic is a waste of your precious time then why the fuck are you here?
If you actually were bright enough, you would see that I do indeed support intelligent posts and threads, but ofc you are not that bright.

Philosophy = love of wisdom, not cozy chat.
What a dope you must be Hex. I figured out that ofc = of course which isn't the standard abbreviation, loser.

PhilX
Post Reply