Philosophy Now Forum

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am None whatsoever. You can't even define "define".

I can do it just fine.

But tell you something . . . you can't accurately assess what other people can and what they cannot do.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am it simply means you are incompetent at thinking without outside of language/definitions.

Thinking outside of language is called non-thinking.

A specialty of yours.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am I don't give a fuck about being understood or understanding you. I am not trying to bond with you.

I know. But that's not something to be proud of.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am Exactly. If you want to be understood and understand others - try dating.

So you don't want to be understood. Doesn't that mean that you're writing because . . . you enjoy masturbating?

I know, I know . . .you're trying to defend your weak swollen overblown ego.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am Perhaps you are here because you are incompetent at that too?

That was funny. But still, irrelevant.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am I am not misusing it. I am using it in a manner that upsets you.

I'm going to spill my coffee if you continue cracking jokes.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:20 am No I don't, you dumb nitpicking zombie.

Equivocation entailing a contradiction is not the same thing as conflating equivocation with contradiction.

I am not nitpicking. I am just showing how clueless you are regarding basic stuff. You take pride in it and hide behind, "I'm a free thinker, I think outside of the box, I am so unconventional, I don't care about language and communication, only dating I care about."

Look . . . What you accused me of is not even semantic shift. Claiming that John is a tall person and then claiming that John is a short person is not a semantic shift. Seriously, guy. You really are clueless.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:23 am\
I can do it just fine.

But tell you something . . . you can't accurately assess what other people can and what they cannot do.

Yet you can accurately assess what I can; or can't accurately assess?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:23 am\
Thinking outside of language is called non-thinking.

You can call it whatever you want. The relabeling has no effect on the process.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:23 am\
I know. But that's not something to be proud of.

Thanks. I'll be mindful if I ever feel prideful about it.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:23 am\
So you don't want to be understood. Doesn't that mean that you're writing because . . . you enjoy masturbating?

You think I want to be understood by an determined misunderstander like you? What a fucking idiot.

I am just using you to exercise my bullshit-o-meter.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:26 am I am not nitpicking. I am just showing how clueless you are regarding basic stuff. You take pride in it and hide behind, "I'm a free thinker, I think outside of the box, I am so unconventional, I don't care about language and communication, only dating I care about."

Look . . . What you accused me of is not even semantic shift. Claiming that John is a tall person and then claiming that John is a short person is not a semantic shift. Seriously, guy. You really are clueless.

You are even more incompetent as a troll than you are as a thinker.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:07 am You think I want to be understood by an determined misunderstander like you? What a fucking idiot.

No, I think you want to defend your weak sensitive swollen overblown ego.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:39 am No, I think you want to defend your weak sensitive swollen overblown ego.

Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:55 am Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

Blah blah blah.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 10:14 am

Skepdick wrote: ↑Mon Mar 10, 2025 9:55 am Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

Blah blah blah.

See! I understand exactly the type of idiot you are.

The OP is correct but we're all familiar with LEM. What do we call the "imposter"? I wish it, doe it ... have a name?