What LEM is not

[Magnus Anderson]

None whatsoever. You can't even define "define".

I can do it just fine.

But tell you something . . . you can't accurately assess what other people can and what they cannot do.

it simply means you are incompetent at thinking without outside of language/definitions.

Thinking outside of language is called non-thinking.

A specialty of yours.

I don't give a f*** about being understood or understanding you. I am not trying to bond with you.

I know. But that's not something to be proud of.

Exactly. If you want to be understood and understand others - try dating.

So you don't want to be understood. Doesn't that mean that you're writing because . . . you enjoy masturbating?

I know, I know . . .you're trying to defend your weak swollen overblown ego.

Perhaps you are here because you are incompetent at that too?

That was funny. But still, irrelevant.

I am not misusing it. I am using it in a manner that upsets you.

I'm going to spill my coffee if you continue cracking jokes.

[Magnus Anderson]

No I don't, you dumb nitpicking zombie.

Equivocation entailing a contradiction is not the same thing as conflating equivocation with contradiction.

I am not nitpicking. I am just showing how clueless you are regarding basic stuff. You take pride in it and hide behind, "I'm a free thinker, I think outside of the box, I am so unconventional, I don't care about language and communication, only dating I care about."

Look . . . What you accused me of is not even semantic shift. Claiming that John is a tall person and then claiming that John is a short person is not a semantic shift. Seriously, guy. You really are clueless.

[Skepdick]

\
I can do it just fine.

But tell you something . . . you can't accurately assess what other people can and what they cannot do.

Yet you can accurately assess what I can; or can't accurately assess?

\
Thinking outside of language is called non-thinking.

You can call it whatever you want. The relabeling has no effect on the process.

\
I know. But that's not something to be proud of.

Thanks. I'll be mindful if I ever feel prideful about it.

\
So you don't want to be understood. Doesn't that mean that you're writing because . . . you enjoy masturbating?

You think I want to be understood by an determined misunderstander like you? What a f****** idiot.

I am just using you to exercise my bullshit-o-meter.

[Skepdick]

I am not nitpicking. I am just showing how clueless you are regarding basic stuff. You take pride in it and hide behind, "I'm a free thinker, I think outside of the box, I am so unconventional, I don't care about language and communication, only dating I care about."

Look . . . What you accused me of is not even semantic shift. Claiming that John is a tall person and then claiming that John is a short person is not a semantic shift. Seriously, guy. You really are clueless.

You are even more incompetent as a troll than you are as a thinker.

[Magnus Anderson]

You think I want to be understood by an determined misunderstander like you? What a f****** idiot.

No, I think you want to defend your weak sensitive swollen overblown ego.

[Skepdick]

No, I think you want to defend your weak sensitive swollen overblown ego.

Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

[Magnus Anderson]

Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

Blah blah blah.

[Skepdick]

Is that why you keep framing everything in terms of "defending" and "attacking"?

It all makes sense now, you warmongering egomaniac! Is your impotence a factor here?

Blah blah blah.

See! I understand exactly the type of idiot you are.

[Hudjefa]

The OP is correct but we're all familiar with LEM. What do we call the "imposter"? I wish it, doe it ... have a name?