For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Nah, it was the text that showed this.Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:56 amIs this an example of what you call 'good' 'mind reading'?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:38 am Your first reaction to my question shows it was not elusive to you in the least.
But the text showed, and proved, absolutely the opposite.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 10:06 amNah, it was the text that showed this.Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 9:56 amIs this an example of what you call 'good' 'mind reading'?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 8:38 am Your first reaction to my question shows it was not elusive to you in the least.
Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?
What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:14 amWhy do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?
Or, do you not believe, absolutely, this claim and assertion of yours here?
And, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.
And, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:30 amWhat an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....
So very True.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:30 amAnd, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.
Consequently, you were asking questions you knew the answer to. I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:58 pmAnd, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:30 amWhat an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....So very True.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:30 amAnd, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.
LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand what I am actually meaning and pointing out in what I actually say and write here.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pmConsequently, you were asking questions you knew the answer to.Age wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 12:58 pmAnd, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 11:30 am
What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....So very True.
LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pm I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.
LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand how to communicate well.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pm I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.
Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.
If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.And, this is without you even informing you that what you are presuming is not even actually true anyway.
But, you have not yet been able to comprehend and understand this.
If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pmLOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand how to communicate well.
But, you, still, do not get it.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pmIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pm I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pmIf only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.And, this is without you even informing you that what you are presuming is not even actually true anyway.
But, you have not yet been able to comprehend and understand this.
And, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pmIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pm I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.
I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.But, you, still, do not get it.
What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.
. 'What you are not understanding, and missing completely, is what I have been pointing out and showing you here. Even with clear examples, you, still, manage to miss them, and thus manage to also completely misunderstand what it is, exactly, that I am pointing out and revealing here.
And, what you are showing, revealing, and proving to be absolutely True, as well, to the readers here, for me, you are absolutely completely missing, also
Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 am
If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.
Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amAnd, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.
Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pmIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 1:04 pm I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.But, you, still, do not get it.
What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.
Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 am. 'What you are not understanding, and missing completely, is what I have been pointing out and showing you here. Even with clear examples, you, still, manage to miss them, and thus manage to also completely misunderstand what it is, exactly, that I am pointing out and revealing here.
And, what you are showing, revealing, and proving to be absolutely True, as well, to the readers here, for me, you are absolutely completely missing, also
'The readers.´LOL. Yeah, not trying to shame or reassure yourself.
I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here. But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 am 'This is what he'll read' 'Let me remind you what this hallucinated group now sees about your and your posts.' LOL. Here's an experiment for you. Above you tell me 'what I am revealing and proving to be absolutely true'. Do you even know your motivation for telling me about 'readers', what I am proving, making statements beginning with 'if you only knew'? Who are you actually trying to convince of something? Notice how you need to make up something here, to answer that in an ego-syntonic way. Note: I'm not interested in the answer you'll make up for me and your usual posturing. That's just BS. But if you're curious, notice that you 'inform' me of a lot of things, like those I mentioned, but how it's actually posturing.
If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.
Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amAnd, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.
Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pm
Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.But, you, still, do not get it.
What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.
LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.
you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.
What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.
And you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.
So, you say.By the way, I would say and claim the exact things anywhere else that I say and claim here, in this philosophy forum. So, any presumption of so-called 'free feeling' here, in this philosophy, when not being 'looked at' is beyond ridiculous and is absolutely False. I would feel just as free as I do here, in a philosophy forum, claiming things as I would if 'we' were in the exact same room with 'you' staring 'at me'.
Yes, all very easy to say and claim.So, why are you 'sure' of what you just said and claimed here?
I know I can back up and support my claims with proof, which obviously has to be irrefutable. So, I would 'feel' 'as free' claiming things to you, 'in, so-called, 'person' as I do here, on the internet.
Informative. But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.
Sometimes using, as you do here, two different ones.But, and again, you have a huge tendency to follow only what you already believe is true and right, no matter how false and wrong it actually is.
How convenient.I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.
I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.
What have I, supposedly, previously been informed of and about, exactly, that, supposedly, makes what I have said here a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amConsidering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.
Are you trying to look very immature here?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amAnd, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.
Again, absolutely no clarification provided this one. Only attempts at deflection, and deception.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Mon Aug 05, 2024 2:33 pm
Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.But, you, still, do not get it.
What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.
you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.
What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.
So, even when I talk about this one, only, it, still, wants to try to talk about me so-called 'universalizing'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amAnd you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.
And, just as easy to prove. And, to prove absolutely True, also.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amSo, you say.By the way, I would say and claim the exact things anywhere else that I say and claim here, in this philosophy forum. So, any presumption of so-called 'free feeling' here, in this philosophy, when not being 'looked at' is beyond ridiculous and is absolutely False. I would feel just as free as I do here, in a philosophy forum, claiming things as I would if 'we' were in the exact same room with 'you' staring 'at me'.
Yes, all very easy to say and claim.So, why are you 'sure' of what you just said and claimed here?
I know I can back up and support my claims with proof, which obviously has to be irrefutable. So, I would 'feel' 'as free' claiming things to you, 'in, so-called, 'person' as I do here, on the internet.
And, there is far, far more information, to reveal, to those who show interest and curiosity.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amInformative.Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.
LOL What do you think or believe you are even 'disagreeing' with here, exactly?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 am But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.
Once again, this one has completely and utterly 'missed the mark'.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amSometimes using, as you do here, two different ones.But, and again, you have a huge tendency to follow only what you already believe is true and right, no matter how false and wrong it actually is.
This pattern falls under what I meant by 'posturing'. It's almost as if you think the longer answers are somehow stronger and the repetition, more so.
Okay, but why do you believe that you can not wait?Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amHow convenient.I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.
I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.
I thought I'd show you your idiotic response by using it.
What are you, an assertion?Not that you will clarify here. As you will prove me True, once more.
I'm glad you recognize the immaturity of your posts.Are you trying to look very immature here?
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amIwannaplato wrote: ↑Tue Aug 06, 2024 5:55 am
I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.
you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.
What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.
Age, you don't notice, but your posts are contentless. I am mirroring them. And you're hardly concise about it.Again, absolutely no clarification provided this one. Only attempts at deflection, and deception.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amAnd you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.
Ah, here I can help. You assume that I respond to others the way I do you. You simply refer to what you see as my patterns as if they are that way in any context, with any person.So, even when I talk about this one, only, it, still, wants to try to talk about me so-called 'universalizing'.
So, you assumed.Which is, obviously, just more distraction, deflection, and deception on this one's part.
And what do you think led to my losing interest and curiosity about what you might reveal. I have said some of the reasons. Perhaps you remember:And, there is far, far more information, to reveal, to those who show interest and curiosity.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 am But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.
I wasn't. I said, that you've found five or six ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words. You tend to write ten words or more when what you mean is that you disagree. I wasn't disagreeing, I was pointing out your habit.LOL What do you think or believe you are even 'disagreeing' with here, exactly?
Odd, here you seem to understand what I meant and above you did not.Also, why are you so narrowed and closed here? Why do you think or believe that I am only saying 'I disagree'?
And yet another way of saying it.Once again, this one has completely and utterly 'missed the mark'.
Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Thu Aug 08, 2024 10:17 amHow convenient.I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.
I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.
I do hope you're joking here. It seems you can't understand the colloquialism 'I can't wait' nor, again, irony.Okay, but why do you believe that you can not wait?