Was Hitler as bad as some make him out to be?

[Iwannaplato]

Your first reaction to my question shows it was not elusive to you in the least.

Is this an example of what you call 'good' 'mind reading'?

Nah, it was the text that showed this.

[Age]

Your first reaction to my question shows it was not elusive to you in the least.

Is this an example of what you call 'good' 'mind reading'?

Nah, it was the text that showed this.

But the text showed, and proved, absolutely the opposite.

[Iwannaplato]

But the text showed, and proved, absolutely the opposite.

LOL, what an idiot you are.

[Age]

But the text showed, and proved, absolutely the opposite.

LOL, what an idiot you are.

Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?

Or, do you not believe, absolutely, this claim and assertion of yours here?

[Iwannaplato]

But the text showed, and proved, absolutely the opposite.

LOL, what an idiot you are.

Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?

Or, do you not believe, absolutely, this claim and assertion of yours here?

What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....

And, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.

[Age]

LOL, what an idiot you are.

Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?

Or, do you not believe, absolutely, this claim and assertion of yours here?

What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....

And, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.

And, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.

So very True.

[Iwannaplato]

Why do you believe, absolutely, that 'I' am a so-called "idiot", exactly?

Or, do you not believe, absolutely, this claim and assertion of yours here?

What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....

And, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.

And, this is because I know, exactly, who, and what, you all are, and how, and why, you all think, and do, what you all think, and do.

So very True.

Consequently, you were asking questions you knew the answer to. I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

[Age]

What an idiot you are! It seems you are asking questions you already know the answers to, according to you.....

And, it is, extremely obvious, that you are not clarifying, and just trying to deflect, once more.

So very True.

Consequently, you were asking questions you knew the answer to.

LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand what I am actually meaning and pointing out in what I actually say and write here.

For example, just look at 'your claim' here. What you are assuming and believing here, once more, could not be further from the actual Truth of things.

And, the funniest part of all of this is that you, still, have absolutely no clue nor idea what has been actually happening and occurring here, exactly.

I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.

And, this is without you even informing you that what you are presuming is not even actually true anyway.

But, you have not yet been able to comprehend and understand this.

[Iwannaplato]

LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand what I am actually meaning and pointing out in what I actually say and write here.

LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand how to communicate well.

I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

And, this is without you even informing you that what you are presuming is not even actually true anyway.

But, you have not yet been able to comprehend and understand this.

If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.

[Age]

LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand what I am actually meaning and pointing out in what I actually say and write here.

LOL you, still, after all of this time, have not yet been able to comprehend and understand how to communicate well.

If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.

And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.

I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

But, you, still, do not get it.

What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.

What you are not understanding, and missing completely, is what I have been pointing out and showing you here. Even with clear examples, you, still, manage to miss them, and thus manage to also completely misunderstand what it is, exactly, that I am pointing out and revealing here.

And, what you are showing, revealing, and proving to be absolutely True, as well, to the readers here, for me, you are absolutely completely missing, also.

But, please keep on doing what you are here. Using what you are doing here, for direct proof of what I will be saying and claiming, will work, absolutely perfectly, for me.

And, this is without you even informing you that what you are presuming is not even actually true anyway.

But, you have not yet been able to comprehend and understand this.

If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.

[Iwannaplato]

If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.

If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.

And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.

And, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.

I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

But, you, still, do not get it.

What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.

I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.

What you are not understanding, and missing completely, is what I have been pointing out and showing you here. Even with clear examples, you, still, manage to miss them, and thus manage to also completely misunderstand what it is, exactly, that I am pointing out and revealing here.

And, what you are showing, revealing, and proving to be absolutely True, as well, to the readers here, for me, you are absolutely completely missing, also

. '
'The readers.´LOL. Yeah, not trying to shame or reassure yourself. 'This is what he'll read' 'Let me remind you what this hallucinated group now sees about your and your posts.' LOL. Here's an experiment for you. Above you tell me 'what I am revealing and proving to be absolutely true'. Do you even know your motivation for telling me about 'readers', what I am proving, making statements beginning with 'if you only knew'? Who are you actually trying to convince of something? Notice how you need to make up something here, to answer that in an ego-syntonic way. Note: I'm not interested in the answer you'll make up for me and your usual posturing. That's just BS. But if you're curious, notice that you 'inform' me of a lot of things, like those I mentioned, but how it's actually posturing.

If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.

[Age]

If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.

If this is what you believe, then this 'must' be true, to you.

Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.

And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.

And, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.

Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.

I know it's hard to understand. Ask a friend to help you with this.

LOL Again, what you presume is hard to understand here could not be any more simple and easy to understand.

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

But, you, still, do not get it.

What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.

I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.

Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.

you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.

What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.

But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.

By the way, I would say and claim the exact things anywhere else that I say and claim here, in this philosophy forum. So, any presumption of so-called 'free feeling' here, in this philosophy, when not being 'looked at' is beyond ridiculous and is absolutely False. I would feel just as free as I do here, in a philosophy forum, claiming things as I would if 'we' were in the exact same room with 'you' staring 'at me'.

So, why are you 'sure' of what you just said and claimed here?

I know I can back up and support my claims with proof, which obviously has to be irrefutable. So, I would 'feel' 'as free' claiming things to you, 'in, so-called, 'person' as I do here, on the internet.

What you are not understanding, and missing completely, is what I have been pointing out and showing you here. Even with clear examples, you, still, manage to miss them, and thus manage to also completely misunderstand what it is, exactly, that I am pointing out and revealing here.

And, what you are showing, revealing, and proving to be absolutely True, as well, to the readers here, for me, you are absolutely completely missing, also

. '
'The readers.´LOL. Yeah, not trying to shame or reassure yourself.

Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

But, and again, you have a huge tendency to follow only what you already believe is true and right, no matter how false and wrong it actually is.

'This is what he'll read' 'Let me remind you what this hallucinated group now sees about your and your posts.' LOL. Here's an experiment for you. Above you tell me 'what I am revealing and proving to be absolutely true'. Do you even know your motivation for telling me about 'readers', what I am proving, making statements beginning with 'if you only knew'? Who are you actually trying to convince of something? Notice how you need to make up something here, to answer that in an ego-syntonic way. Note: I'm not interested in the answer you'll make up for me and your usual posturing. That's just BS. But if you're curious, notice that you 'inform' me of a lot of things, like those I mentioned, but how it's actually posturing.

If only you knew what I comprehend and understand... I've admired that informationless, cinematic non-response for a while. I can see the appeal of using it. It implies so much and says nothing. But it must feel good for would-be gurus. Even a mere human can find it amusing to not respond with.

I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here. But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.

[Iwannaplato]

Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.

Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.

And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.

And, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.

Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.

Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

But, you, still, do not get it.

What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.

I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.

Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.

you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.

What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.

LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.

But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.

And you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.

By the way, I would say and claim the exact things anywhere else that I say and claim here, in this philosophy forum. So, any presumption of so-called 'free feeling' here, in this philosophy, when not being 'looked at' is beyond ridiculous and is absolutely False. I would feel just as free as I do here, in a philosophy forum, claiming things as I would if 'we' were in the exact same room with 'you' staring 'at me'.

So, you say.

So, why are you 'sure' of what you just said and claimed here?

I know I can back up and support my claims with proof, which obviously has to be irrefutable. So, I would 'feel' 'as free' claiming things to you, 'in, so-called, 'person' as I do here, on the internet.

Yes, all very easy to say and claim.

Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

Informative. But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.

But, and again, you have a huge tendency to follow only what you already believe is true and right, no matter how false and wrong it actually is.

Sometimes using, as you do here, two different ones.

This pattern falls under what I meant by 'posturing'. It's almost as if you think the longer answers are somehow stronger and the repetition, more so.

I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.

How convenient.

But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.

I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'

[Age]

Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.

Considering what you have previously been informed of and about, what you have just said here is a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say.

What have I, supposedly, previously been informed of and about, exactly, that, supposedly, makes what I have said here a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say?

Not that you will clarify here. As you will prove me True, once more.

And, once again, it is all 'my fault' for all of this one's misunderstanding here.

And, once again, it is all 'other people's fault' for all the misunderstandings here.

Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.

Well this is another Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say and claim, especially considering what you have already been informed of and about, as well.

Are you trying to look very immature here?

Exactly, that was irony on my part; in fact, I would go so far as to call it sarcasm.

But, you, still, do not get it.

What you presume I am not understanding I had already fully understood.

I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.

Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.

you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.

What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.

LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.

Again, absolutely no clarification provided this one. Only attempts at deflection, and deception.

But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.

And you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.

So, even when I talk about this one, only, it, still, wants to try to talk about me so-called 'universalizing'.

Which is, obviously, just more distraction, deflection, and deception on this one's part.

By the way, I would say and claim the exact things anywhere else that I say and claim here, in this philosophy forum. So, any presumption of so-called 'free feeling' here, in this philosophy, when not being 'looked at' is beyond ridiculous and is absolutely False. I would feel just as free as I do here, in a philosophy forum, claiming things as I would if 'we' were in the exact same room with 'you' staring 'at me'.

So, you say.

So, why are you 'sure' of what you just said and claimed here?

I know I can back up and support my claims with proof, which obviously has to be irrefutable. So, I would 'feel' 'as free' claiming things to you, 'in, so-called, 'person' as I do here, on the internet.

Yes, all very easy to say and claim.

And, just as easy to prove. And, to prove absolutely True, also.

Once again, you have presumed some thing, which is absolutely False, Wrong, Inaccurate, and Incorrect.

Informative.

And, there is far, far more information, to reveal, to those who show interest and curiosity.

But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.

LOL What do you think or believe you are even 'disagreeing' with here, exactly?

Also, why are you so narrowed and closed here? Why do you think or believe that I am only saying 'I disagree'?

Now, since you have completely missed what has been actually happening and occurring here, you have presumed that 'I am disagreeing'. Which, from 'the way' you are moving here, you will never know.

But, and again, you have a huge tendency to follow only what you already believe is true and right, no matter how false and wrong it actually is.

Sometimes using, as you do here, two different ones.

This pattern falls under what I meant by 'posturing'. It's almost as if you think the longer answers are somehow stronger and the repetition, more so.

Once again, this one has completely and utterly 'missed the mark'.

I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.

How convenient.

But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.

I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'

Okay, but why do you believe that you can not wait?

[Iwannaplato]

What have I, supposedly, previously been informed of and about, exactly, that, supposedly, makes what I have said here a Truly idiotic and stupid thing to say?

I thought I'd show you your idiotic response by using it.

Not that you will clarify here. As you will prove me True, once more.

What are you, an assertion?

Are you trying to look very immature here?

I'm glad you recognize the immaturity of your posts.

I'm sure it's must feel freeing to be able to claims things on the internet where no one can look at you while you do.

Once again, 'we' have another example of trying to deflect, and thus deceive as well.

you have completely and utterly missed what has happened and occurred here, once more.

What you are presuming I was talking about is not what I was.

LOL. You put so little effort into talking about what you are talking about. And this was yet another example.

Again, absolutely no clarification provided this one. Only attempts at deflection, and deception.

Age, you don't notice, but your posts are contentless. I am mirroring them. And you're hardly concise about it.

But, as you have proven over and over continuously, you much prefer to just believe things on your already obtained assumptions of things, before making any attempt at all to just obtain clarity.

And you have proven that you universalize the way people end up interacting with you with how they are in general.

So, even when I talk about this one, only, it, still, wants to try to talk about me so-called 'universalizing'.

Ah, here I can help. You assume that I respond to others the way I do you. You simply refer to what you see as my patterns as if they are that way in any context, with any person.

Which is, obviously, just more distraction, deflection, and deception on this one's part.

So, you assumed.

And, there is far, far more information, to reveal, to those who show interest and curiosity.

And what do you think led to my losing interest and curiosity about what you might reveal. I have said some of the reasons. Perhaps you remember:

But it is great that you've found five or six different ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words.

LOL What do you think or believe you are even 'disagreeing' with here, exactly?

I wasn't. I said, that you've found five or six ways of saying 'I disagree' using more words. You tend to write ten words or more when what you mean is that you disagree. I wasn't disagreeing, I was pointing out your habit.

Also, why are you so narrowed and closed here? Why do you think or believe that I am only saying 'I disagree'?

Odd, here you seem to understand what I meant and above you did not.

Once again, this one has completely and utterly 'missed the mark'.

And yet another way of saying it.

I am not, exactly, sure what you are trying to say and claim here.

How convenient.

But, you are appearing to become more 'frazzled' as some might say, as we progress and move along here.

I can't wait to meet the rest of the 'some.'

Okay, but why do you believe that you can not wait?

I do hope you're joking here. It seems you can't understand the colloquialism 'I can't wait' nor, again, irony.