Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 8:40 am

Contrary to 'popular belief', here, things do actually exist whether some one is believing it, or not.

So, obviously the actual Truth is things do exist whether entities that exist inter-subjectively believe they do or not.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:01 am

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:15 am God is Love

But, 'this one' also claims that God is everything, and thus hate as well.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:15 am God is selfless, unconditional, real and true.

But, to 'this one' anyway, God is also selfish, conditional, not real, and not true.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:15 am A Love that holds space for you to be the selfish fuck you are.

And, to even hold the so-called 'selfish fuck' that you are, and God is also.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:15 am God is the platform for everything. The platform for everything is TRUTH

Again, if you would like some help in finding the Right words to use, here, so that you do not end up continually contradicting "your" own 'self', here, then 'I' am more than happy to provide 'you' some assistance.

Unconditional Love allows everything to be.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am There’s nothing excluded from Gods love.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am I don’t know how many times I’ve mentioned this to you, but you choose not to listen, and the reason you don’t listen is because you have closed yourself off to others points of view. You are not open you are closed.

Start a thread if using the right words is important to you. You could call the thread HOW TO USE THE RIGHT WORDS TO AVOID CONTRADICTING YOURSELF.

Until you start that thread you’ll just continue to make an absolute ass out of yourself which you have successfully succeeded to do in every interaction you’ve ever had with others and is why most people just ignore you.

Your communication style is atrocious.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 9:01 am

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 8:40 am

Contrary to 'popular belief', here, things do actually exist whether some one is believing it, or not.

So, obviously the actual Truth is things do exist whether entities that exist inter-subjectively believe they do or not.

I don’t believe you.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:54 am

LuckyR wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 3:33 am

Age wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 8:40 am

Contrary to 'popular belief', here, things do actually exist whether some one is believing it, or not.

So, obviously the actual Truth is things do exist whether entities that exist inter-subjectively believe they do or not.

But, 'this' can only be explained to, and be understood by, those entities that exist 'inter-subjectively' that already understand and know what the term and phrase' 'inter-subjectively' means and is referring to, exactly.

Inter subjective entities are those that exist as a shared belief between many individuals. Like gods.

Was your claim, and example, here, meant to 'clear things up', here?

If yes, then okay.

Now, 'I' asked 'you',
'Does some thing only exist if there is some one believing in 'it'?'

To which 'you' replied,

'It does for entities that exist inter-subjectively.'

But, 'now' you say and claim that, 'inter-subjective entities' are 'those', which exist in a 'shared belief between many individuals'.

So,

1. First off, things can exist whether there is some entity believing in 'it', or not.

2. 'Inter-subjectivity' does not matter if things exist, or not.

3. If things exist for 'inter-subjectively entities', then so what?

4. Why can there not be just a small number of so-called 'inter-subjective entities'?

5. And, a shared belief by a group of some or many people does not mean that what they believe actually does exist.

LuckyR wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:36 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:54 am

LuckyR wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 3:33 am

Inter subjective entities are those that exist as a shared belief between many individuals. Like gods.

Was your claim, and example, here, meant to 'clear things up', here?

If yes, then okay.

Now, 'I' asked 'you',
'Does some thing only exist if there is some one believing in 'it'?'

To which 'you' replied,

'It does for entities that exist inter-subjectively.'

But, 'now' you say and claim that, 'inter-subjective entities' are 'those', which exist in a 'shared belief between many individuals'.

So,

1. First off, things can exist whether there is some entity believing in 'it', or not.

2. 'Inter-subjectivity' does not matter if things exist, or not.

3. If things exist for 'inter-subjectively entities', then so what?

4. Why can there not be just a small number of so-called 'inter-subjective entities'?

5. And, a shared belief by a group of some or many people does not mean that what they believe actually does exist.

Just concentrate on number 5 and you'll get it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 7:12 am “ Man is the most insane species. He worships an invisible God and destroys a visible Natue. Unaware that this Nature he’s destroying is this God he’s worshipping “

Signed the Goddess.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 4:21 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:01 am

But, 'this one' also claims that God is everything, and thus hate as well.


But, to 'this one' anyway, God is also selfish, conditional, not real, and not true.


And, to even hold the so-called 'selfish fuck' that you are, and God is also.


Again, if you would like some help in finding the Right words to use, here, so that you do not end up continually contradicting "your" own 'self', here, then 'I' am more than happy to provide 'you' some assistance.

Unconditional Love allows everything to be.

So, to "fairy" anyway, it allows children to be abused because to "fairy" 'this' is so-called 'unconditional love'.

Which probably helps in explaining why "fairy" regrets, absolutely, bring children into 'this world'. And, thus why "fairy" wishes that it was also never born into 'this world'.

'This one' actually believes that 'the abuse', which it had to suffer with in childhood was all of its parent's so-called 'unconditional love' for it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am There’s nothing excluded from Gods love.

'This one' has certainly not yet grasped what the words, 'unconditional love', and, 'God's love', are actually meaning and referring to, exactly.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am I don’t know how many times I’ve mentioned this to you, but you choose not to listen, and the reason you don’t listen is because you have closed yourself off to others points of view. You are not open you are closed.

Start a thread if using the right words is important to you. You could call the thread HOW TO USE THE RIGHT WORDS TO AVOID CONTRADICTING YOURSELF.

Until you start that thread you’ll just continue to make an absolute ass out of yourself which you have successfully succeeded to do in every interaction you’ve ever had with others and is why most people just ignore you.

Your communication style is atrocious.

Okay.

But have you noticed your, human being, communication style over the last few thousand years or so, hitherto when this is being written?

Is what is happening and occurring 'now' in all of what you people call the 'war-torn' places caused from 'kind' communication style, or would it be better described as coming from, literally, an 'atrocious' communication style?

Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:56 am

LuckyR wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:36 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 7:54 am

Was your claim, and example, here, meant to 'clear things up', here?

If yes, then okay.

Now, 'I' asked 'you',
'Does some thing only exist if there is some one believing in 'it'?'

To which 'you' replied,

'It does for entities that exist inter-subjectively.'

But, 'now' you say and claim that, 'inter-subjective entities' are 'those', which exist in a 'shared belief between many individuals'.

So,

1. First off, things can exist whether there is some entity believing in 'it', or not.

2. 'Inter-subjectivity' does not matter if things exist, or not.

3. If things exist for 'inter-subjectively entities', then so what?

4. Why can there not be just a small number of so-called 'inter-subjective entities'?

5. And, a shared belief by a group of some or many people does not mean that what they believe actually does exist.

Just concentrate on number 5 and you'll get it.

But if you had already concentrated, enough, then you would have already got it.

Belinda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:11 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 4:21 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am

Unconditional Love allows everything to be.

So, to "fairy" anyway, it allows children to be abused because to "fairy" 'this' is so-called 'unconditional love'.

Which probably helps in explaining why "fairy" regrets, absolutely, bring children into 'this world'. And, thus why "fairy" wishes that it was also never born into 'this world'.

'This one' actually believes that 'the abuse', which it had to suffer with in childhood was all of its parent's so-called 'unconditional love' for it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am There’s nothing excluded from Gods love.

'This one' has certainly not yet grasped what the words, 'unconditional love', and, 'God's love', are actually meaning and referring to, exactly.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am I don’t know how many times I’ve mentioned this to you, but you choose not to listen, and the reason you don’t listen is because you have closed yourself off to others points of view. You are not open you are closed.

Start a thread if using the right words is important to you. You could call the thread HOW TO USE THE RIGHT WORDS TO AVOID CONTRADICTING YOURSELF.

Until you start that thread you’ll just continue to make an absolute ass out of yourself which you have successfully succeeded to do in every interaction you’ve ever had with others and is why most people just ignore you.

Your communication style is atrocious.

Okay.

But have you noticed your, human being, communication style over the last few thousand years or so, hitherto when this is being written?

Is what is happening and occurring 'now' in all of what you people call the 'war-torn' places caused from 'kind' communication style, or would it be better described as coming from, literally, an 'atrocious' communication style?

You both need tutoring in communication via use of English. There is hope for Age who thinks for himself whereas Fairy possibly is too submerged in cliches to be rescued.

Belinda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:11 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 4:21 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am

Unconditional Love allows everything to be.

So, to "fairy" anyway, it allows children to be abused because to "fairy" 'this' is so-called 'unconditional love'.

Which probably helps in explaining why "fairy" regrets, absolutely, bring children into 'this world'. And, thus why "fairy" wishes that it was also never born into 'this world'.

'This one' actually believes that 'the abuse', which it had to suffer with in childhood was all of its parent's so-called 'unconditional love' for it.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am There’s nothing excluded from Gods love.

'This one' has certainly not yet grasped what the words, 'unconditional love', and, 'God's love', are actually meaning and referring to, exactly.

Fairy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 8:49 am I don’t know how many times I’ve mentioned this to you, but you choose not to listen, and the reason you don’t listen is because you have closed yourself off to others points of view. You are not open you are closed.

Start a thread if using the right words is important to you. You could call the thread HOW TO USE THE RIGHT WORDS TO AVOID CONTRADICTING YOURSELF.

Until you start that thread you’ll just continue to make an absolute ass out of yourself which you have successfully succeeded to do in every interaction you’ve ever had with others and is why most people just ignore you.

Your communication style is atrocious.

Okay.

But have you noticed your, human being, communication style over the last few thousand years or so, hitherto when this is being written?

Is what is happening and occurring 'now' in all of what you people call the 'war-torn' places caused from 'kind' communication style, or would it be better described as coming from, literally, an 'atrocious' communication style?

You both need tutoring in communication via use of English.

Belinda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:16 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:56 am

LuckyR wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 5:36 am

Just concentrate on number 5 and you'll get it.

But if you had already concentrated, enough, then you would have already got it.

Good point, Age, (Number 5)but Lucky did not imply that.

Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 11:17 am Stop changing the subject.

https://youtu.be/b2T_Ny4hXrk?si=hhfxUglnhhQ81OdL

Theory that the universe exists only to observe itself through you.

Age wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:34 am

Belinda wrote: ↑Thu Sep 11, 2025 10:11 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Sep 10, 2025 4:21 pm

So, to "fairy" anyway, it allows children to be abused because to "fairy" 'this' is so-called 'unconditional love'.

Which probably helps in explaining why "fairy" regrets, absolutely, bring children into 'this world'. And, thus why "fairy" wishes that it was also never born into 'this world'.

'This one' actually believes that 'the abuse', which it had to suffer with in childhood was all of its parent's so-called 'unconditional love' for it.


'This one' has certainly not yet grasped what the words, 'unconditional love', and, 'God's love', are actually meaning and referring to, exactly.


Okay.

But have you noticed your, human being, communication style over the last few thousand years or so, hitherto when this is being written?

Is what is happening and occurring 'now' in all of what you people call the 'war-torn' places caused from 'kind' communication style, or would it be better described as coming from, literally, an 'atrocious' communication style?

You both need tutoring in communication via use of English.

Could 'we' all need more tutoring in 'communication', via use of whatever language?

If no, then who is/are 'the one/s' who do/es not need any tutoring in communication?