godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:24 pm
Age wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:39 pm
Obviously this applies to 'you' only, here, as 'I' have NO beliefs at all, here. It is ONLY 'you', here, who accepts BELIEFS, which you can NOT even explain.
A belief is a proposition that you accept as true.
OBVIOUSLY one would HAVE TO first have a proposition that they accept as true. I do NOT have propositions that I accept as true. Therefore, unlike 'you' I do NOT have beliefs, here.
godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:24 pm
You assert "'I' have NO beliefs at all", which is a proposition that you apparently accept as true, i.e. a belief.
Talk about another prime example of one believing some thing to be true BEFORE even beginning to just seek out CLARIFICATION, FIRST.
I will just say and write, ' you are Wrong, once again, here'.
But, you do not accept this because you 'currently' BELIEVE that you are NOT Wrong, here, right?
godelian wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2024 2:24 pm
However, the belief "'I' have NO beliefs at all" is clearly contradictory.
OBVIOUSLY, this one has PROVED, AGAIN, that it is, still, NOT YET OPEN enough to just 'discuss' things, here.
But, at least you have appeared to make much better arguments here than you previously have, although your arguments here are, still, NOT YET sound and valid arguments. Which, AGAIN, are the ONLY arguments worthy of being repeated.