Philosophy Now Forum

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2024 9:24 pm We have to make sure what we write is refined enough to not to digress..

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 12:46 am I think we should be focusing on this:

Whether it’s true that letters are good to be written or not.

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Sun Jul 14, 2024 11:16 pm Familiarization with logical proof is more prevalent when you use it yourself, I feel that a lot of what we know could easily be an imitation of actual knowledge, and that that problem is the cause of mishaps in the realm of philosophy.

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 12:11 am Take god for example; an ever present reason to exist with no other besides it. At first it seems like an easy task to understand that that is god. But if you look more closely, you see something that follows all those rules, but fails to be the god of intended meaning

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Mon Jul 15, 2024 11:58 pm What I would like to discuss is the matter of what coherence is, and what things comprise independence of thought

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:33 am Concept is a thought of -that- which is can either be known to be true or false. The difference between a concept being true or false is that -that- exists (or doesn’t)

I’d like to propose that “that” which is true maintains its consistency without the thought of it, and that which is false has no element “that” whether thought of or not

Ollie.ha wrote: ↑Tue Jul 16, 2024 5:44 pm No worries

To be honest I lost track of this conversation on my first reply…

Back to the original topic: how can we know, letter by letter, what is good to write?

Impenitent wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2024 11:12 pmfizzool

-Imp

Impenitent wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2024 11:12 pm what we write is never interpreted exactly as we intend...

fizzool

-Imp

Impenitent wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2024 11:12 pm what we write is never interpreted exactly as we intend...

fizzool

-Imp