Letter by letter

For all things philosophical.

Moderators: AMod, iMod

Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

I think we should be focusing on this:

Whether it’s true that letters are good to be written or not.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

You mean longhand versus print?
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

Yes
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

So where do you stand on the issue, Ollie?
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

Familiarization with logical proof is more prevalent when you use it yourself, I feel that a lot of what we know could easily be an imitation of actual knowledge, and that that problem is the cause of mishaps in the realm of philosophy.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

❓
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

Take god for example; an ever present reason to exist with no other besides it. At first it seems like an easy task to understand that that is god. But if you look more closely, you see something that follows all those rules, but fails to be the god of intended meaning
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

Okay.

What does that have to do with...
Whether it’s true that letters are good to be written or not.
Help me out here. I'd like to converse but I kinda need to know what it is you wanna converse about.
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

My point was that if you can coherently find something independent of thinking it that you would be able to understand what it is you’re trying to prove more easily than if an AI told you…
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

What I would like to discuss is the matter of what coherence is, and what things comprise independence of thought
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

Ollie.ha wrote: Mon Jul 15, 2024 11:58 pm What I would like to discuss is the matter of what coherence is, and what things comprise independence of thought
Okay, I'm up for that. Tell me your position.
User avatar
accelafine
Posts: 5042
Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2023 10:16 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by accelafine »

I'm pretty sure this is either a bot or he wants us to think he's a bot for some reason. He might get frustrated in that sense. His comments are no more incoherent than those of most of the regulars.
User avatar
henry quirk
Posts: 16379
Joined: Fri May 09, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: 🔥AMERICA🔥
Contact:

Re: Letter by letter

Post by henry quirk »

accelafine wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:10 am I'm pretty sure this is either a bot or he wants us to think he's a bot for some reason. He might get frustrated in that sense. His comments are no more incoherent than those of most of the regulars.
I'm thinking it's an age-type entity...which could make it a bot or autist or the next 3 Letter Agency patsy.
Ollie.ha
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2023 11:42 pm

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Ollie.ha »

Concept is a thought of -that- which is can either be known to be true or false. The difference between a concept being true or false is that -that- exists (or doesn’t)

I’d like to propose that “that” which is true maintains its consistency without the thought of it, and that which is false has no element “that” whether thought of or not
Last edited by Ollie.ha on Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
Age
Posts: 27841
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 8:17 am

Re: Letter by letter

Post by Age »

henry quirk wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:21 am
accelafine wrote: Tue Jul 16, 2024 12:10 am I'm pretty sure this is either a bot or he wants us to think he's a bot for some reason. He might get frustrated in that sense. His comments are no more incoherent than those of most of the regulars.
I'm thinking it's an age-type entity...which could make it a bot or autist or the next 3 Letter Agency patsy.
So, what, exactly, is "age", to you "henry quirk"?

Are you even able to clarify any thing, exactly?
Post Reply