Page 3 of 5
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 9:47 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:26 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 7:36 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 1:25 pm
Oh my god, an obnoxious American evangelical preacher has just hijacked Harry's wedding and Prince Charles and William can barely keep a straight face
You seem to be skipping the fact that Meghan is also an American (explains the American preacher). So in this instance, you can tell the difference.
Btw not the first time an American had married into British royalty and is the second time an actress has done so from the US.

PhilX
I wonder who paid for the wedding? (Rhetorical question). That raving egomaniac was so out of place it was like an SNL skit (a very funny one)
Trust the yanks to ruin a royal wedding, events that are known for their beauty and refined good taste (and the Americans were doing ok up to that point. They seemed to be keeping their crass obnoxiousness in check for once). The poor Queen and Philip are 92 and 96 respectively and had to sit through that ranting lunatic patronising the congregation for what seemed like an eternity. I kept expecting a long walking stick to appear, hook him around the throat, and remove him from his podium.
What difference does it make if they're "yanks" or not? It would be like saying what your background is.

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 9:50 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:47 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:26 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 7:36 pm
You seem to be skipping the fact that Meghan is also an American (explains the American preacher). So in this instance, you can tell the difference.
Btw not the first time an American had married into British royalty and is the second time an actress has done so from the US.

PhilX
I wonder who paid for the wedding? (Rhetorical question). That raving egomaniac was so out of place it was like an SNL skit (a very funny one)
Trust the yanks to ruin a royal wedding, events that are known for their beauty and refined good taste (and the Americans were doing ok up to that point. They seemed to be keeping their crass obnoxiousness in check for once). The poor Queen and Philip are 92 and 96 respectively and had to sit through that ranting lunatic patronising the congregation for what seemed like an eternity. I kept expecting a long walking stick to appear, hook him around the throat, and remove him from his podium.
What difference does it make if they're "yanks" or not? It would be like saying what your background is.

PhilX
Because only yanks would have done it.
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 9:59 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:50 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:47 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:26 pm
I wonder who paid for the wedding? (Rhetorical question). That raving egomaniac was so out of place it was like an SNL skit (a very funny one)
Trust the yanks to ruin a royal wedding, events that are known for their beauty and refined good taste (and the Americans were doing ok up to that point. They seemed to be keeping their crass obnoxiousness in check for once). The poor Queen and Philip are 92 and 96 respectively and had to sit through that ranting lunatic patronising the congregation for what seemed like an eternity. I kept expecting a long walking stick to appear, hook him around the throat, and remove him from his podium.
What difference does it make if they're "yanks" or not? It would be like saying what your background is.

PhilX
Because only yanks would have done it.
Prove it.

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:02 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Walker wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 2:50 pm
VT wrote:βIs this referring to actual liberalism, or some illiterate American wanker's moronic 'definition' of 'liberalism'?β
What is your notion of "actual liberalism" that you obstinately refuse to define?
I've defined it over and over again and it falls on deaf ears. You only have to look at the word to know what it means. It's you illiterates who refuse to define what you imagine it means.
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:04 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:59 pm
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:50 pm
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 9:47 pm
What difference does it make if they're "yanks" or not? It would be like saying what your background is.

PhilX
Because only yanks would have done it.
Prove it.

PhilX
Prove what?
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:22 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
Are you playing dumb?

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:39 pm
by vegetariantaxidermy
A question you have never been asked

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sat May 19, 2018 10:42 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
A tip for you. Always be wary of statements using the words "all" and "only."

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 4:55 am
by Philosophy Explorer
The question is why do you like to act stupid? And why did you say your father showed you pictures of the My Lai massacre when you were a child? You know you made up that story to try to justify your prejudice against Americans.

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 5:28 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 4:55 am
The question is why do you like to act stupid? And why did you say your father showed you pictures of the My Lai massacre when you were a child? You know you made up that story to try to justify your prejudice against Americans.

PhilX
Not specifically me. We all saw the photos. He was a journalist and we were all brought up politically aware and anti war. And I don't have to justify anything. As I've said, I don't like anything about you or your country, except perhaps the trees and excellent quality of American-made products (few and far between now). It 'is what it is'.
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 5:58 am
by Philosophy Explorer
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 5:28 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 4:55 am
The question is why do you like to act stupid? And why did you say your father showed you pictures of the My Lai massacre when you were a child? You know you made up that story to try to justify your prejudice against Americans.

PhilX
Not specifically me. We all saw the photos. He was a journalist and we were all brought up politically aware and anti war. And I don't have to justify anything. As I've said, I don't like anything about you or your country, except perhaps the trees and excellent quality of American-made products (few and far between now). It 'is what it is'.
Why the trees? What makes American trees so special?

PhilX

Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 7:11 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 5:58 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 5:28 am
Philosophy Explorer wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 4:55 am
The question is why do you like to act stupid? And why did you say your father showed you pictures of the My Lai massacre when you were a child? You know you made up that story to try to justify your prejudice against Americans.

PhilX
Not specifically me. We all saw the photos. He was a journalist and we were all brought up politically aware and anti war. And I don't have to justify anything. As I've said, I don't like anything about you or your country, except perhaps the trees and excellent quality of American-made products (few and far between now). It 'is what it is'.
Why the trees? What makes American trees so special?

PhilX
I get the impression that Americans really love their trees. Even New York City is full of them.
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 9:05 am
by Walker
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 10:02 pm
Walker wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 2:50 pm
VT wrote:βIs this referring to actual liberalism, or some illiterate American wanker's moronic 'definition' of 'liberalism'?β
What is your notion of "actual liberalism" that you obstinately refuse to define?
I've defined it over and over again and it falls on deaf ears. You only have to look at the word to know what it means. It's you illiterates who refuse to define what you imagine it means.
Perhaps your unstated definition is sui generis.
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 9:13 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Walker wrote: βSun May 20, 2018 9:05 am
vegetariantaxidermy wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 10:02 pm
Walker wrote: βSat May 19, 2018 2:50 pm
What is your notion of "actual liberalism" that you obstinately refuse to define?
I've defined it over and over again and it falls on deaf ears. You only have to look at the word to know what it means. It's you illiterates who refuse to define what you imagine it means.
Perhaps your unstated definition is sui generis.
It's not unstated. WTF do you think liberty means? Isn't that a clue? Or do you think liberty is a political movement too?
Re: Liberalism
Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 9:33 am
by Walker
You obviously think that questions are definitions.
Is this a corruption of philosophy?