The Democrat Party Hates America

[FlashDangerpants]

You may be correct in your evaluation of Chat and other AIs, You need to be more explicit. I think the main dangers are one, overuse especially among children, and two , AIs are controlled by commercial interests and can sell to the highest bidder.

I think overuse of AI is turning some people into terrible bores who can only discuss AI and will take over any random conversation to make it about GPT.

I am not afraid of you

Weird thing to bother to write if it's true. Pathetic thing to try and change the topic to if it's not.

[Walker]

Wrong again. You're on a roll, Flashdangerpants. Some folks call it a kaiser roll.

[Belinda]

I think overuse of AI is turning some people into terrible bores who can only discuss AI and will take over any random conversation to make it about GPT.

I am not afraid of you

Weird thing to bother to write if it's true. Pathetic thing to try and change the topic to if it's not.

It's hardly "weird" to make fun of someone who goes all ad hominem as you did.

[FlashDangerpants]

I am not afraid of you

Weird thing to bother to write if it's true. Pathetic thing to try and change the topic to if it's not.

It's hardly "weird" to make fun of someone who goes all ad hominem as you did.

It's impossible to commit the informal ad-hominem fallacy if one is not responding to an argument. Please at least learn the basics.

[Belinda]

Weird thing to bother to write if it's true. Pathetic thing to try and change the topic to if it's not.

It's hardly "weird" to make fun of someone who goes all ad hominem as you did.

It's impossible to commit the informal ad-hominem fallacy if one is not responding to an argument. Please at least learn the basics.

The argument is expressed in the foregoing posts.

[FlashDangerpants]

You're wrong.

I'm not, I cited correct law for the matter you described.

Wrong.

*

Actually, Obama Can Be Indicted. Here’s Why.

The Court explicitly left the door open for criminal charges—even against sitting or former presidents—if the conduct in question was personal, political, or unrelated to the legitimate functions of the presidency. And, let’s be honest: What Barack Obama did during the Russian collusion hoax wasn’t just political—it was a calculated abuse of power far outside the bounds of his official role.

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/ ... y-n4942091

Bad luck, President Trump just said otherwise, and a simp like you would never contradict the great

Trump claims Supreme Court immunity ruling spares Obama from treason case
Donald Trump admitted his own Supreme Court victory granting 'presidential immunity' means it's unlikely Barack Obama will be charged with treason over his handling of the 'Russia hoax.'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... Court.html

[FlashDangerpants]

It's hardly "weird" to make fun of someone who goes all ad hominem as you did.

It's impossible to commit the informal ad-hominem fallacy if one is not responding to an argument. Please at least learn the basics.

The argument is expressed in the foregoing posts.

Really? Please do tell, what were the premises and the conclusion of your argument as expressed in the foregoing posts?

[Belinda]

It's impossible to commit the informal ad-hominem fallacy if one is not responding to an argument. Please at least learn the basics.

The argument is expressed in the foregoing posts.

Really? Please do tell, what were the premises and the conclusion of your argument as expressed in the foregoing posts?

No. Please do this for yourself. The posts are short and clear. You can do it if you try.

[FlashDangerpants]

My sense of humour is perhaps childish, however I do enjoy the social connotations of words and to this day the good old Anglo Saxon lexicon is where we find really rude words.

Fewer of them than you think. Even quim is Scottish not Anglo. Shit and fuck are Anglo I believe, but IRC piss is French and **** is latin, and most of the others such as p**** are modern euphemism converted to swears.

There was nothing at all in that post that needed dumbing down. Trying to divert my umbrage with a chance to swear is the least clever tactic you have ever used.

Don't be so suspicious! I just like to have laugh. You don't have to be sobersides all the time. BTW I can talk about etymology for hours it's one one my favourite topics. I myself am lowland Scots and I doubt if you can inform me about Anglo Saxon roots of lowland Scottish .

Language evolution is social. Latinate words tend to be posher; high class as to diet ,established religions ,apparel, and academia. Political power likes to be socially exclusive. Take Trump for instance , he pretends to be like a common man and he does the common touch very well. But it's a big ploy to disguise his real political bias towards money and power.

You may be correct in your evaluation of Chat and other AIs, You need to be more explicit. I think the main dangers are one, overuse especially among children, and two , AIs are controlled by commercial interests and can sell to the highest bidder.

None of that constitutes an argument. Nor anything close. This is boring.

[Walker]

Trump says lots of different things, and just look at the results.

He even recently said to a reporter that the tariffs are bringing in so much money that a little rebate to the people might be in order.

He knows the Left, with all their expert predictions of doom, will choke on that one.

[Walker]

Watergate is to Obamagate like small is to large.

The media can blather, but the facts are there for history.

No better time to pay attention and suffer the loss of all those old delusions, for realizing that what you thought was true was actually the machine telling you lies. Taking the first step is admitting what a sucker you've been about USA news.

[FlashDangerpants]

Bad luck, President Trump just said otherwise, and a simp like you would never contradict the great


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... Court.html

Trump says lots of different things

In this case what he said is that you are wrong.

Live with it.

[Walker]

Bad luck, President Trump just said otherwise, and a simp like you would never contradict the great


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... Court.html

Trump says lots of different things

In this case what he said is that you are wrong.

Live with it.

Trump doesn't know me from the man in the moon.

Suddenly you're appealing to the Authority of The Trump.
Apparently any authority will do for you when you don't know what you're talking about.

But you must face the fact that makes Trump your boy.

FlashMagaPants? Now that would be an honorable name.

*

Trump reduces Russia deadline to end Ukraine invasion to ‘10 to 12 days’ from original 50: ‘No reason to wait that long’
https://nypost.com/2025/07/28/world-new ... raine-war/

Trump said fifty days.
Now he says ten days.
What a liar.

He doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.



*

(Obviously, Trump's speaking to establish plausible deniability of personal retribution.)

In the voice of Trump: "Oh ... those criminal acts of Obama and Co. are not immune to prosecution? Well, I didn't even know that. But since that's the law, I suppose they better be off to the hoosegow. No one is above the law, don't you know."

If you're going to wear the MagaPants, you need to start thinking more realistically.

[FlashDangerpants]

Trump says lots of different things

In this case what he said is that you are wrong.

Live with it.

Trump doesn't know me from the man in the moon.

Suddenly you're appealing to the Authority of The Trump.
Apparently any authority will do for you when you don't know what you're talking about.

But you must face the fact that makes Trump your boy.

FlashMagaPants? Now that would be an honorable name.

*

Trump reduces Russia deadline to end Ukraine invasion to ‘10 to 12 days’ from original 50: ‘No reason to wait that long’
https://nypost.com/2025/07/28/world-new ... raine-war/

Trump said fifty days.
Now he says ten days.
What a liar.

He doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.



*

(Obviously, Trump's speaking to establish plausible deniability of personal retribution.)

In the voice of Trump: "Oh ... those criminal acts of Obama and Co. are not immune to prosecution? Well, I didn't even know that. But since that's the law, I suppose they better be off to the hoosegow. No one is above the law, don't you know."

If you're going to wear the MagaPants, you need to start thinking more realistically.

Fine with me. Trump can face prosecution for all those secrets he stole then.

[Walker]

Come on, hop on that Trump Train. FlashMagaPants. No one will rub your face into the mess of how wrong you were before you realized the truth of the Democrat Party (it hates America).

Just look at the deals he is making across the globe. He did a dandy with Japan. And the EU? Hooo boy. That's what happens when the art of the deal meets politics with an operations-type guy who know to keep attention upon on time and under budget, and who knows the wisdom of dynamic analysis rather than tired old Leftist thinking ...

... who also happens to be a pretty good salesman who knows how to wield Lame Duck Power ... while winking at the style-conscious poseurs in European cuts of cloth who have been ripping off USA for so long that they don't mind paying up, even though some probably seethe with resentment, but you would know more about that.