Philosophy Now Forum

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:49 pm On WHAT exactly?

Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:31 pm

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:55 pm

Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 6:25 pm So much noise. Not worth wading through or taking seriously. Good luck to you.

If what I write is to hard, to complex, and to illogical for you to comprehend and understand...

You may be intoxicated with your own spin, but other people may not find as much value in it. There are surely countless worthwhile perspectives and approaches to choose from, and they don't all have to be convoluted and spun-up in themselves -- although it's a common human/ego tendency to do so. The more noise, the more spin... is a common pattern I've noticed.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 12:51 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 10:49 pm On WHAT exactly?

You need to stop being an asshole.
And I need to stop being immature.

I thought it's obvious?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:13 am Fair enough. But without clarity, through clarifying questions, all you are doing is ASSUMING you know what it is that I have to express, which could be completely and utterly WRONG.

But if you NEVER question, you will NEVER know.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 7:57 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 2:13 am Fair enough. But without clarity, through clarifying questions, all you are doing is ASSUMING you know what it is that I have to express, which could be completely and utterly WRONG.

But if you NEVER question, you will NEVER know.

Every time somebody asks you an clarifying question - you attack them.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:14 am Another accusation. SHOW where this, supposedly, happened. Do NOT just say it happened. If you provide an example, then I WILL answer the question.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:20 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:14 am Another accusation. SHOW where this, supposedly, happened. Do NOT just say it happened. If you provide an example, then I WILL answer the question.

No. You can do your own homework.

I am not interested in hearing your excuses/justifications for your behavior.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 am

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:20 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:14 am Another accusation. SHOW where this, supposedly, happened. Do NOT just say it happened. If you provide an example, then I WILL answer the question.

No. You can do your own homework.

I am not interested in hearing your excuses/justifications for your behavior.

LOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.

ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?

There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.

YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.

Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.

IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.

Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 am

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 8:20 am
No. You can do your own homework.

I am not interested in hearing your excuses/justifications for your behavior.

LOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.

ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?

There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.

YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.

Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.

IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.

Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.

There you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amYou do not take well...

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amno scratch that. You are incapable of processing criticism or negative feedback without becoming defensive.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 am

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 am

LOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.

ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?

There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.

YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.

Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.

IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.

Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.

There you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.

The entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amYou do not take well...

But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amno scratch that. You are incapable of processing criticism or negative feedback without becoming defensive.

If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:10 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 am

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 am
There you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.

The entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amYou do not take well...

But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amno scratch that. You are incapable of processing criticism or negative feedback without becoming defensive.

If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.

Exactly. Your above response is evidence for my claim. You do not take to criticism gracefully.

I do not need to provide evidence, because your actions speak for themselves.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:15 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:29 pm

Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmThat is extremely EASY and SIMPLE to answer and SHOW.

Show it then... Don’t just say it, show it ....Where is the individual self?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmWrapped up in individual thought/s.

Within every human body there are two selves, the individual self and the true Self.

You believe that Self is easy and simple to answer and show...and the above reply is your answer to my request to SHOW it?

I do NOT believe any thing. HOW CAN some thing as simple as that,NOT be understood YET?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:30 am

Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:10 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 am

The entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.



But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.



If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.

Exactly. Your above response is evidence for my claim. You do not take to criticism gracefully.

I do not need to provide evidence, because your actions speak for themselves.

LOL

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 3:15 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Mar 10, 2019 2:29 pm

Show it then... Don’t just say it, show it ....Where is the individual self?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmWrapped up in individual thought/s.

Within every human body there are two selves, the individual self and the true Self.

You believe that Self is easy and simple to answer and show...and the above reply is your answer to my request to SHOW it?

I do NOT believe any thing. HOW CAN some thing as simple as that,NOT be understood YET?

To assert knowledge of something as a truth statement is a belief.

Dontaskme:

Age.. all you've done is described it..you haven't shown it...if the individual Self exists which you say it does, then show it...does the individual self exist as a physical seen thing?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmOF COURSE NOT.

Do you understand the term, "I SEE what you mean", when some one is TELLING you some thing? Things can be and ARE 'illustrated' in words, therefore things can be 'SEEN', which also means UNDERSTAND, from WORDS.

DESCRIBING things, with WORDS, is EXACTLY how things are SHOWN, and SEEN/UNDERSTOOD.

You, especially, "dontaskme" KNOW that there is NO PHYSICAL self, therefore WHY would you even ASSUME and/or EXPECT that I was going to POINT to some physical thing?

Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmThe 'individual self' is NOT just "a thought". The 'individual self' IS, literally, the invisible thoughts (and emotions) within an individual physical human body. Both thoughts and emotions are obviously INVISIBLE, to the physical eyes.

Now does that make sense. If it is NOT understood, then just say so, and I will see if I can SHOW it in another way.