You need to stop being an asshole.
And I need to stop being immature.
I thought it's obvious?
Fair enough. But without clarity, through clarifying questions, all you are doing is ASSUMING you know what it is that I have to express, which could be completely and utterly WRONG.Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Mar 12, 2019 11:31 pmYou may be intoxicated with your own spin, but other people may not find as much value in it. There are surely countless worthwhile perspectives and approaches to choose from, and they don't all have to be convoluted and spun-up in themselves -- although it's a common human/ego tendency to do so. The more noise, the more spin... is a common pattern I've noticed.
To work on stopping to be 'immature' is obvious. One, literally, just needs to grow up, to be more mature. However,
Every time somebody asks you an clarifying question - you attack them.
LOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.
There you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 amLOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.
ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?
There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.
YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.
Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.
IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.
Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.
The entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amThere you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 amLOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.
ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?
There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.
YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.
Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.
IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.
Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.
But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.
If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.
Exactly. Your above response is evidence for my claim. You do not take to criticism gracefully.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 amThe entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.Logik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:52 amThere you go... ^^^^^ this entire post is an attack.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 9:29 am
LOL You appear to be absolutely BLINDED by your own DISTORTED views.
ONCE AGAIN you are ACCUSING me of doing, or that I going to do, some thing. Do you now have any proof that I have made an excuse/justification for what you ALLEGE I have done? Of yes, the WHERE is it?
There is CERTAINLY NO excuse/justification in the post that you are replying to now.
YOU say I attack people EVERY TIME they ask me a clarifying question, YET when I ask you to provide just one example you say that I can do my own homework.
Besides the FACT that I am NOT going to do any homework and look for some thing, which I wonder is even there, your inactions are SHOWING us that just maybe you are incapable of providing any evidence at all for your ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS.
IF EVERY time I am asked a clarifying question I attack ,as you propose is the case, then PROVE IT. Just ONE example WILL suffice.
Now that you have ONCE AGAIN made another ACCUSATION against me here now you can also provide some EVIDENCE for this also. That is, OF COURSE, if you can.
But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.
If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.
LOLLogik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:10 amExactly. Your above response is evidence for my claim. You do not take to criticism gracefully.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 amThe entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.
But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.
If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.
I do not need to provide evidence, because your actions speak for themselves.
To assert knowledge of something as a truth statement is a belief.
Laughter instead of acknowledgement.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:30 amLOLLogik wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:10 amExactly. Your above response is evidence for my claim. You do not take to criticism gracefully.Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 10:05 am
The entire thread was SHOWING that you make ASSUMPTIONS and ACCUSATIONS without providing any support for them.
But I am taking ALL of this very well. Thank you. What you are doing SUPPORTS what I am SAYING and SHOWING. YOU, through YOUR very words, IS my back up and evidence.
If you SEE that asking for evidence is being "defensive", then so be it. Some would say that the very opposite is the truth, of what is actually occurring.
I do not need to provide evidence, because your actions speak for themselves.
From my perspective, to have or hold a BELIEF is to NOT be OPEN to anything contrary to the BELIEF.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2019 11:35 amTo assert knowledge of something as a truth statement is a belief.
Dontaskme:
Age.. all you've done is described it..you haven't shown it...if the individual Self exists which you say it does, then show it...does the individual self exist as a physical seen thing?
To SEE something is to understand that no thing has ever been seen... and that things are only known not SEEN by no thing. Which means there is nothing to really understand here and that is the only understanding there is to understand.Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmOF COURSE NOT.
Do you understand the term, "I SEE what you mean", when some one is TELLING you some thing? Things can be and ARE 'illustrated' in words, therefore things can be 'SEEN', which also means UNDERSTAND, from WORDS.
DESCRIBING things, with WORDS, is EXACTLY how things are SHOWN, and SEEN/UNDERSTOOD.
You, especially, "dontaskme" KNOW that there is NO PHYSICAL self, therefore WHY would you even ASSUME and/or EXPECT that I was going to POINT to some physical thing?
So is this the two selves you are talking about?...the physical and the non-physical?Age wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 10:05 pmThe 'individual self' is NOT just "a thought". The 'individual self' IS, literally, the invisible thoughts (and emotions) within an individual physical human body. Both thoughts and emotions are obviously INVISIBLE, to the physical eyes.
Now does that make sense. If it is NOT understood, then just say so, and I will see if I can SHOW it in another way.