Philosophy Now Forum

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:39 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:30 am

Yes I, oh sorry 'i', prefer evidence to listening to the voices and watching the visual hallucinations. Don't try to understand it.

AGAIN, this BASING things ON 'evidence', of ALL things, INSTEAD OF ON ACTUAL 'proof', IS WHY 'they' TOOK SO, SO LONG TO 'CATCH UP'.

LOL Just LOOK AT HOW LONG it TOOK 'these human beings' TO 'CATCH UP' TO the Fact that it IS the earth that revolves around the sun, and NOT the other way around, which was 'evident', well TO 'them' anyway, that 'they' WERE BASING 'their ASSUMPTION and BELIEF that it is the sun that revolves around the earth. Which, coincidentally, and by the way, TO 'them' was EVIDENCE of the 'geocentric universe', which some them DIED BELIEVING was the TRUTH. Some people REALLY DO TAKE LONGER than others to 'CATCH UP' TO what the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth IS, EXACTLY.

LOL Some REALLY DID MUCH PREFER, LOL, 'evidence' OVER ACTUAL 'proof'.

'i' meant the opposite obviously.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Or do you think that the voices you hear etc. ARE the proof.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:19 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:39 am

AGAIN, this BASING things ON 'evidence', of ALL things, INSTEAD OF ON ACTUAL 'proof', IS WHY 'they' TOOK SO, SO LONG TO 'CATCH UP'.

LOL Just LOOK AT HOW LONG it TOOK 'these human beings' TO 'CATCH UP' TO the Fact that it IS the earth that revolves around the sun, and NOT the other way around, which was 'evident', well TO 'them' anyway, that 'they' WERE BASING 'their ASSUMPTION and BELIEF that it is the sun that revolves around the earth. Which, coincidentally, and by the way, TO 'them' was EVIDENCE of the 'geocentric universe', which some them DIED BELIEVING was the TRUTH. Some people REALLY DO TAKE LONGER than others to 'CATCH UP' TO what the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth IS, EXACTLY.

LOL Some REALLY DID MUCH PREFER, LOL, 'evidence' OVER ACTUAL 'proof'.

'i' meant the opposite obviously.

So, 'this one' SAID and WROTE some thing, VERY CLEARLY. However, what it, supposedly, ACTUALLY MEANT is the OPPOSITE.

I WONDER if it DOES THIS,
ALL OF THE TIME?
SOME TIMES? Or,
JUST THIS TIME?

WHY would 'this one' WRITE and CLAIM some thing, BUT, supposedly ACTUALLY MEAN the OPPOSITE?

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

WHY is what I WRITE, TO you, me LYING?

WHY can it NOT be ANY thing ELSE?

Did I SAY and/or WRITE that 'you' PREFER EVIDENCE OVER PROOF?

If yes, then WHERE and WHEN, EXACTLY?

OBVIOUSLY 'evidence' is NOT WORTH ANY thing, ESPECIALLY WHEN 'proof' IS BEFORE EVERY one, HERE, FOR ALL TO LOOK AT, and SEE.

'Evidence' can OBVIOUSLY BE FALLIBLE and FAULTY. While 'proof' NEVER could be.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Or do you think that the voices you hear etc. ARE the proof.

What voices are 'you' talking ABOUT, here, EXACTLY?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:34 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:26 am

Again, for the sad little man called 'Ken', I have never initiated discourse with you. Your intrusive red blobs appear incessantly on my notifications, so responding to them gives you no reason to assume I am interested in your repulsive HUMAN self in any way, shape or form.

So, 'now', 'the bot', and 'transbot', is, AGAIN, A 'human', but NOT just 'a human', but A capitalized 'HUMAN self'.

The thought that you could be an actual human being was too horrible to contemplate I suppose.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am I do hope you are well secured in your institution.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:24 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:34 am

So, 'now', 'the bot', and 'transbot', is, AGAIN, A 'human', but NOT just 'a human', but A capitalized 'HUMAN self'.

The thought that you could be an actual human being was too horrible to contemplate I suppose.

So, here is a GOOD example of;

Did PRE-EXISTING thinking, only, MAKE 'the BELIEF', APPEAR.

Or, is it the case that PRE-EXISTING BELIEF/S, MAKE 'the thoughts', APPEAR?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am I do hope you are well secured in your institution.

Okay. So, 'now', like "atla" ONCE BELIEVED, 'this one' BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that 'I' am in A 'institution', and one that IS MINE, of ALL places.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:24 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:19 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am
'i' meant the opposite obviously.

So, 'this one' SAID and WROTE some thing, VERY CLEARLY. However, what it, supposedly, ACTUALLY MEANT is the OPPOSITE.

I WONDER if it DOES THIS,
ALL OF THE TIME?
SOME TIMES? Or,
JUST THIS TIME?

WHY would 'this one' WRITE and CLAIM some thing, BUT, supposedly ACTUALLY MEAN the OPPOSITE?

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

WHY is what I WRITE, TO you, me LYING?

WHY can it NOT be ANY thing ELSE?

Did I SAY and/or WRITE that 'you' PREFER EVIDENCE OVER PROOF?

If yes, then WHERE and WHEN, EXACTLY?

OBVIOUSLY 'evidence' is NOT WORTH ANY thing, ESPECIALLY WHEN 'proof' IS BEFORE EVERY one, HERE, FOR ALL TO LOOK AT, and SEE.

'Evidence' can OBVIOUSLY BE FALLIBLE and FAULTY. While 'proof' NEVER could be.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 5:50 am Or do you think that the voices you hear etc. ARE the proof.

What voices are 'you' talking ABOUT, here, EXACTLY?

Again: quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:26 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:24 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am

The thought that you could be an actual human being was too horrible to contemplate I suppose.

So, here is a GOOD example of;

Did PRE-EXISTING thinking, only, MAKE 'the BELIEF', APPEAR.

Or, is it the case that PRE-EXISTING BELIEF/S, MAKE 'the thoughts', APPEAR?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:05 am I do hope you are well secured in your institution.

Okay. So, 'now', like "atla" ONCE BELIEVED, 'this one' BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that 'I' am in A 'institution', and one that IS MINE, of ALL places.

You need to be you fucking kunt. Being a complete virgin nobody must be awful.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:26 am No wonder you came up with this fantasy that you are THE ONE. Was that after you saw The Matrix?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:34 am True. Everyone else is 'lacking in comprehension' because they don't 'comprehend' a schizophrenic freak. Who would actually want to?

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:29 am _______

Knowing that I'm to blame for this sidetrack into "kensville," I now humbly suggest that we get back to the topic of the thread.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:29 am Seeing how the proverbial "Sword of Damocles" has been hanging over the fate of this forum for a while now,...

...and seeing how it was literally just a few hours ago that Rick got the place working again for us,...

...i sure hope we don't make him regret not pulling the plug on it for good.
_______

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:28 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:24 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:19 am

So, 'this one' SAID and WROTE some thing, VERY CLEARLY. However, what it, supposedly, ACTUALLY MEANT is the OPPOSITE.

I WONDER if it DOES THIS,
ALL OF THE TIME?
SOME TIMES? Or,
JUST THIS TIME?

WHY would 'this one' WRITE and CLAIM some thing, BUT, supposedly ACTUALLY MEAN the OPPOSITE?


WHY is what I WRITE, TO you, me LYING?

WHY can it NOT be ANY thing ELSE?

Did I SAY and/or WRITE that 'you' PREFER EVIDENCE OVER PROOF?

If yes, then WHERE and WHEN, EXACTLY?

OBVIOUSLY 'evidence' is NOT WORTH ANY thing, ESPECIALLY WHEN 'proof' IS BEFORE EVERY one, HERE, FOR ALL TO LOOK AT, and SEE.

'Evidence' can OBVIOUSLY BE FALLIBLE and FAULTY. While 'proof' NEVER could be.



What voices are 'you' talking ABOUT, here, EXACTLY?

Again: quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

LOL Did I EVER SAY you DID?

Come on now "atla", you can NOT REALLY BE this ABSOLUTELY USELESS AT CLARIFYING "your" OWN 'self'.

Also, NOTICE HOW OFTEN 'this one' just RESORTS TO some thing like, 'you are a liar'.

Well ALL ELSE FAILS, 'this' is about ALL 'this one' can RESORT TO.

Also, it is like 'this one', and 'few others', here, can NOT DO MUCH ELSE, than just talk ABOUT 'me'.

'they' OBVIOUSLY can NOT ACTUALLY COUNTER nor REFUTE what I have been POINTING OUT, SHOWING, SAYING, or CLAIMING, here.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:29 am _______

Knowing that I'm to blame for this sidetrack into "kensville," I now humbly suggest that we get back to the topic of the thread.

Seeing how the proverbial "Sword of Damocles" has been hanging over the fate of this forum for a while now,...

...and seeing how it was literally just a few hours ago that Rick got the place working again for us,...

...i sure hope we don't make him regret not pulling the plug on it for good.
_______

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 4:33 pm

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 7:29 am _______

Knowing that I'm to blame for this sidetrack into "kensville," I now humbly suggest that we get back to the topic of the thread.

Seeing how the proverbial "Sword of Damocles" has been hanging over the fate of this forum for a while now,...

...and seeing how it was literally just a few hours ago that Rick got the place working again for us,...

...i sure hope we don't make him regret not pulling the plug on it for good.
_______

He really should pull the plug already. Maybe in a more sane country be held accountable for helping to spread degeneracy.

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 4:24 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:28 am

Atla wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 6:24 am
Again: quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

LOL Did I EVER SAY you DID?

Come on now "atla", you can NOT REALLY BE this ABSOLUTELY USELESS AT CLARIFYING "your" OWN 'self'.

Also, NOTICE HOW OFTEN 'this one' just RESORTS TO some thing like, 'you are a liar'.

Well ALL ELSE FAILS, 'this' is about ALL 'this one' can RESORT TO.

Also, it is like 'this one', and 'few others', here, can NOT DO MUCH ELSE, than just talk ABOUT 'me'.

'they' OBVIOUSLY can NOT ACTUALLY COUNTER nor REFUTE what I have been POINTING OUT, SHOWING, SAYING, or CLAIMING, here.

Yes you did:

"AGAIN, this BASING things ON 'evidence', of ALL things, INSTEAD OF ON ACTUAL 'proof', IS WHY 'they' TOOK SO, SO LONG TO 'CATCH UP'.

...
LOL Some REALLY DID MUCH PREFER, LOL, 'evidence' OVER ACTUAL 'proof'."

So now you are lying about this too.

Resorting to it when all else fails: third lie. I'm not resorting to it and things didn't fail. It's a simple fact that you're a liar.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:46 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.