Could Trump and Company Destroy Us?

[Age]

And considering that in 5-10 years you have given absolutely no proof for what you think the 'I' is,

1. And ONCE AGAIN, for those who are NOT ABLE TO READ and COMPREHEND, I do NOT 'think', here.

2. NO one HAS ASKED FOR 'proof'. So, OBVIOUSLY, there is NO INCENTIVE TO PROVIDE ANY.

Obviously, until CURIOSITY and/or INTEREST IS SHOWN, then WHY would 'I' WANT TO PROVIDE ANY PROOF.

If 'you' KNEW who 'I' AM, EXACTLY, then 'you' would ALREADY KNOW there is CERTAINLY NO RUSH, here, FOR 'Me'.

we have absolutely no reason to think that that's just the way things are.

Do 'you', whoever the 'we' word, here, is in relation to, exactly, have ANY reason to think that that is just the way things are, in regards to what 'you' think is just 'the way' things are?

If yes, then what is 'that reason'/'those reasons', EXACTLY?

The most pathetic excuse ever. If you've already had the proof 5-10 years and 10-20k posts earlier, then you would have shown it.

LOL
LOL
LOL

So, ONCE AGAIN, here, 'we' have ANOTHER one WHO BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that it ALREADY KNOWS the ACTUAL Truth of things.

So, FOR ALL others, one HAS TO PROVIDE PROOF, OR, if they DO NOT, then they ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE IT.

LOL Some of 'these ones', literally, could NOT GET MORE CLOSED, and thus BE MORE BLIND, here.

[Atla]

1. And ONCE AGAIN, for those who are NOT ABLE TO READ and COMPREHEND, I do NOT 'think', here.

2. NO one HAS ASKED FOR 'proof'. So, OBVIOUSLY, there is NO INCENTIVE TO PROVIDE ANY.

Obviously, until CURIOSITY and/or INTEREST IS SHOWN, then WHY would 'I' WANT TO PROVIDE ANY PROOF.

If 'you' KNEW who 'I' AM, EXACTLY, then 'you' would ALREADY KNOW there is CERTAINLY NO RUSH, here, FOR 'Me'.



Do 'you', whoever the 'we' word, here, is in relation to, exactly, have ANY reason to think that that is just the way things are, in regards to what 'you' think is just 'the way' things are?

If yes, then what is 'that reason'/'those reasons', EXACTLY?

The most pathetic excuse ever. If you've already had the proof 5-10 years and 10-20k posts earlier, then you would have shown it.

LOL
LOL
LOL

So, ONCE AGAIN, here, 'we' have ANOTHER one WHO BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that it ALREADY KNOWS the ACTUAL Truth of things.

So, FOR ALL others, one HAS TO PROVIDE PROOF, OR, if they DO NOT, then they ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE IT.

LOL Some of 'these ones', literally, could NOT GET MORE CLOSED, and thus BE MORE BLIND, here.

You got nothing, as evidenced once again.

Hell, even 'i' could make a better case for a one-mind many-brains creation/evolution theory than you.

[Age]

Never made any such claim, all-knowing 'the one' who apparently knows why 'you humans' do what you do and has the 'answers to all of humanity's so-called 'problems' '.......

LOL Are 'you' REALLY 'now' 'TRYING TO' CLAIM that 'you' have NEVER CLAIMED that 'you' have written under the label "vegetariantaxidermy"?

Yep.

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

[accelafine]

LOL Are 'you' REALLY 'now' 'TRYING TO' CLAIM that 'you' have NEVER CLAIMED that 'you' have written under the label "vegetariantaxidermy"?

Yep.

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen. How is that relevant to your predicament? You haven't even denied being KEN (lol at your name. So boringly appropriate).

[Age]

The most pathetic excuse ever. If you've already had the proof 5-10 years and 10-20k posts earlier, then you would have shown it.

LOL
LOL
LOL

So, ONCE AGAIN, here, 'we' have ANOTHER one WHO BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that it ALREADY KNOWS the ACTUAL Truth of things.

So, FOR ALL others, one HAS TO PROVIDE PROOF, OR, if they DO NOT, then they ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE IT.

LOL Some of 'these ones', literally, could NOT GET MORE CLOSED, and thus BE MORE BLIND, here.

You got nothing, as evidenced once again.

So, what this one is PROVING True is that it ACCEPTS and BELIEVES 'things' on, LAUGHINGLY, 'evidence' ALONE.

Hell, even 'i' could make a better case for a one-mind many-brains creation/evolution theory than you.

But, 'what theory' are you even talking ABOUT and referring TO, here, EXACTLY?

[Age]

Yep.

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen.

WOW, is 'this' REALLY the ONLY RESPONSE 'you' have, here?

Are you sure you would NOT like to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED, TO you, here?

Obviously if you WERE Honest and Open, here, then you WOULD END UP COMING COMPLETELY 'UNSTUCK', as some would say. So, it is NOT SURPRISING, AT ALL, that you RESPONDED in the ONLY WAY that you HAVE, here.

[accelafine]

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen.

WOW, is 'this' REALLY the ONLY RESPONSE 'you' have, here?

Are you sure you would NOT like to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED, TO you, here?

Obviously if you WERE Honest and Open, here, then you WOULD END UP COMING COMPLETELY 'UNSTUCK', as some would say. So, it is NOT SURPRISING, AT ALL, that you RESPONDED in the ONLY WAY that you HAVE, here.

Actually your question only required a simple yes or no answer. You got more than you asked for darling KEN

[Age]

Yep.

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen. How is that relevant to your predicament?

LOL 'What', SUPPOSED, 'predicament', EXACTLY?

You haven't even denied being KEN

Was 'I' SUPPOSED TO?

(lol at your name. So boringly appropriate).

LOL Is 'this one' REALLY SAYING and WRITING some thing 'like this'?

Also, was it NOT 'this one' WHO KEEPS WHINING and COMPLAINING ABOUT 'me' quoting 'it'?

'This one' is 'now' ACTUALLY WRITING DIRECTLY TO 'me', and ASKING 'me' QUESTIONS, as though 'I' AM A 'human being' and NOT A 'robot'.

[accelafine]

So, TO you, if ANY one went LOOKING through your writings, when you were writing under the label "accelafine", then they will NEVER SEE you DENYING writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", is this what you are saying and claiming, here?

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen. How is that relevant to your predicament?

LOL 'What', SUPPOSED, 'predicament', EXACTLY?

You haven't even denied being KEN

Was 'I' SUPPOSED TO?

(lol at your name. So boringly appropriate).

LOL Is 'this one' REALLY SAYING and WRITING some thing 'like this'?

Also, was it NOT 'this one' WHO KEEPS WHINING and COMPLAINING ABOUT 'me' quoting 'it'?

'This one' is 'now' ACTUALLY WRITING DIRECTLY TO 'me', and ASKING 'me' QUESTIONS, as though 'I' AM A 'human being' and NOT A 'robot'.

Again, for the sad little man called 'Ken', I have never initiated discourse with you. Your intrusive red blobs appear incessantly on my notifications, so responding to them gives you no reason to assume I am interested in your repulsive HUMAN self in any way, shape or form.

[Atla]

LOL
LOL
LOL

So, ONCE AGAIN, here, 'we' have ANOTHER one WHO BELIEVES, ABSOLUTELY, that it ALREADY KNOWS the ACTUAL Truth of things.

So, FOR ALL others, one HAS TO PROVIDE PROOF, OR, if they DO NOT, then they ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE IT.

LOL Some of 'these ones', literally, could NOT GET MORE CLOSED, and thus BE MORE BLIND, here.

You got nothing, as evidenced once again.

So, what this one is PROVING True is that it ACCEPTS and BELIEVES 'things' on, LAUGHINGLY, 'evidence' ALONE.

Hell, even 'i' could make a better case for a one-mind many-brains creation/evolution theory than you.

But, 'what theory' are you even talking ABOUT and referring TO, here, EXACTLY?

Yes I, oh sorry 'i', prefer evidence to listening to the voices and watching the visual hallucinations. Don't try to understand it.

[Age]

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen.

WOW, is 'this' REALLY the ONLY RESPONSE 'you' have, here?

Are you sure you would NOT like to ANSWER the ACTUAL CLARIFYING QUESTION posed, and ASKED, TO you, here?

Obviously if you WERE Honest and Open, here, then you WOULD END UP COMING COMPLETELY 'UNSTUCK', as some would say. So, it is NOT SURPRISING, AT ALL, that you RESPONDED in the ONLY WAY that you HAVE, here.

Actually your question only required a simple yes or no answer. You got more than you asked for darling KEN

you ARE EXACTLY Right.

Which, ONCE AGAIN, WHY READING EVERY thing that is ACTUALLY WRITTEN, FROM A Truly OPEN VIEWPOINT, or PERSPECTIVE, is SO, SO VERY IMPORTANT.

So, I APOLOGIZE, PROFUSELY, TO you "accelafine" FOR BEING DISTRACTED, and MISREADING, and thus MISUNDERSTANDING, you, here.

Now, FOR ANY one INTERESTED "accelafine" has CLARIFIED that it has NEVER EVER DENIED writing under the label "vegatariantaxidermy", here, in this forum.

[Age]

Yep, kenno. Kenny. Ken the retard. Keeeen. How is that relevant to your predicament?

LOL 'What', SUPPOSED, 'predicament', EXACTLY?

You haven't even denied being KEN

Was 'I' SUPPOSED TO?

(lol at your name. So boringly appropriate).

LOL Is 'this one' REALLY SAYING and WRITING some thing 'like this'?

Also, was it NOT 'this one' WHO KEEPS WHINING and COMPLAINING ABOUT 'me' quoting 'it'?

'This one' is 'now' ACTUALLY WRITING DIRECTLY TO 'me', and ASKING 'me' QUESTIONS, as though 'I' AM A 'human being' and NOT A 'robot'.

Again, for the sad little man called 'Ken', I have never initiated discourse with you. Your intrusive red blobs appear incessantly on my notifications, so responding to them gives you no reason to assume I am interested in your repulsive HUMAN self in any way, shape or form.

So, 'now', 'the bot', and 'transbot', is, AGAIN, A 'human', but NOT just 'a human', but A capitalized 'HUMAN self'.

[Age]

You got nothing, as evidenced once again.

So, what this one is PROVING True is that it ACCEPTS and BELIEVES 'things' on, LAUGHINGLY, 'evidence' ALONE.

Hell, even 'i' could make a better case for a one-mind many-brains creation/evolution theory than you.

But, 'what theory' are you even talking ABOUT and referring TO, here, EXACTLY?

Yes I, oh sorry 'i', prefer evidence to listening to the voices and watching the visual hallucinations. Don't try to understand it.

AGAIN, this BASING things ON 'evidence', of ALL things, INSTEAD OF ON ACTUAL 'proof', IS WHY 'they' TOOK SO, SO LONG TO 'CATCH UP'.

LOL Just LOOK AT HOW LONG it TOOK 'these human beings' TO 'CATCH UP' TO the Fact that it IS the earth that revolves around the sun, and NOT the other way around, which was 'evident', well TO 'them' anyway, that 'they' WERE BASING 'their ASSUMPTION and BELIEF that it is the sun that revolves around the earth. Which, coincidentally, and by the way, TO 'them' was EVIDENCE of the 'geocentric universe', which some them DIED BELIEVING was the TRUTH. Some people REALLY DO TAKE LONGER than others to 'CATCH UP' TO what the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth IS, EXACTLY.

LOL Some REALLY DID MUCH PREFER, LOL, 'evidence' OVER ACTUAL 'proof'.

[Atla]

So, what this one is PROVING True is that it ACCEPTS and BELIEVES 'things' on, LAUGHINGLY, 'evidence' ALONE.


But, 'what theory' are you even talking ABOUT and referring TO, here, EXACTLY?

Yes I, oh sorry 'i', prefer evidence to listening to the voices and watching the visual hallucinations. Don't try to understand it.

AGAIN, this BASING things ON 'evidence', of ALL things, INSTEAD OF ON ACTUAL 'proof', IS WHY 'they' TOOK SO, SO LONG TO 'CATCH UP'.

LOL Just LOOK AT HOW LONG it TOOK 'these human beings' TO 'CATCH UP' TO the Fact that it IS the earth that revolves around the sun, and NOT the other way around, which was 'evident', well TO 'them' anyway, that 'they' WERE BASING 'their ASSUMPTION and BELIEF that it is the sun that revolves around the earth. Which, coincidentally, and by the way, TO 'them' was EVIDENCE of the 'geocentric universe', which some them DIED BELIEVING was the TRUTH. Some people REALLY DO TAKE LONGER than others to 'CATCH UP' TO what the ACTUAL and IRREFUTABLE Truth IS, EXACTLY.

LOL Some REALLY DID MUCH PREFER, LOL, 'evidence' OVER ACTUAL 'proof'.

'i' meant the opposite obviously. Quote me saying that 'i' prefer evidence over proof, until then you are just lying again.

Or do you think that the voices you hear etc. ARE the proof.

[accelafine]

LOL 'What', SUPPOSED, 'predicament', EXACTLY?



Was 'I' SUPPOSED TO?


LOL Is 'this one' REALLY SAYING and WRITING some thing 'like this'?

Also, was it NOT 'this one' WHO KEEPS WHINING and COMPLAINING ABOUT 'me' quoting 'it'?

'This one' is 'now' ACTUALLY WRITING DIRECTLY TO 'me', and ASKING 'me' QUESTIONS, as though 'I' AM A 'human being' and NOT A 'robot'.

Again, for the sad little man called 'Ken', I have never initiated discourse with you. Your intrusive red blobs appear incessantly on my notifications, so responding to them gives you no reason to assume I am interested in your repulsive HUMAN self in any way, shape or form.

So, 'now', 'the bot', and 'transbot', is, AGAIN, A 'human', but NOT just 'a human', but A capitalized 'HUMAN self'.

The thought that you could be an actual human being was too horrible to contemplate I suppose. I do hope you are well secured in your institution.